Bernardo P Küster 🇧🇷 engagement report
@bernardopkuster - 308K followers on X
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 4.4K interactions against 308K followers, an engagement rate of 1.44%. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 12.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.44%, Bernardo P Küster 🇧🇷 sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 192 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 3, 20266.1x their median
🚨 CHINA : "We are not providing military support to Iran. We only offer moral backing" https://t.co/0W9D6c3yLS
- May 5, 20263.0x their median
You are not the people. You are stupid slaves on the Epstein's menu of cruel cannibal elites. You are eaten, your brains are. It is why you watch Euphoria. Because all of you are perverts. Disgusting civilization. No reason to exist. Please, die.
- Mar 5, 20263.0x their median
🚨 Atualizações do caso Filipe Martins nos EUA: - Hoje, 05/03, a Justiça federal no Distrito Médio da Flórida 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐨𝐮 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚̃𝐨 𝐝𝐞 “𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐫 𝐨 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐨”, escolhendo o caminho mais próprio da justiça: o do esclarecimento. - Em audiência, o juiz Gregory A. Presnell adiou qualquer julgamento sumário 𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐨𝐮 𝐪𝐮𝐞 𝐨 𝐠𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐨 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐞 𝐚𝐨 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐧𝐚𝐥, 𝐬𝐞𝐦 𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐣𝐚𝐬, 𝐝𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐬, para análise reservada (in camera). 👉 Mais do que isso: diante de questionamentos sobre o registro migratório de “entrada” atribuído a Filipe Martins, 𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐨́𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐨 𝐠𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐮 𝐞𝐦 𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐪𝐮𝐞 𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨 “𝐧𝐚̃𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚 𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫 𝐚𝐥𝐢”. - O juiz ainda ordenou a definição de critérios para uma busca mais ampla por comunicações internas, 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐚 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐨 𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐢𝐮 𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐦 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐨𝐮 𝐝𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐚 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐜̧𝐚̃𝐨. ⚠️No essencial, o tribunal afirmou um princípio simples, mas decisivo: quando um dado estatal produz dano grave, não basta o silêncio administrativo - é preciso transparência, rastreabilidade e responsabilidade.
- Oct 8, 20262.1x their median
Moraes acaba de eleger Flávio.
- Feb 8, 20251.9x their median
O que está acontecendo? Parece que a minha conta, bloqueada por Moraes em maio/2020, foi desbloqueada HOJE pelo STF. Confirmam?
- Jul 2, 20171.7x their median
Os ETs são absolutamente necessários à Nova Ordem Global. Existam ou não, eles vão ter de dar um jeito de aparecer.
- Jan 24, 2016
1) Quando o Lula perceber que a rejeição popular veio para ficar e é totalmente irremediável,
- Mar 29, 2026
EXCLUSIVE 🔴 Open Source Intel has mapped all known Iranian ballistic missile launch sites active over the past month, cross-referenced with satellite imagery, IDF and CENTCOM statements, and OSINT sources. ~1,650 launches recorded Targets: Israel and Gulf states PRIMARY SITES | Satellite + IDF, CENTCOM Confirmed Yazd: Most active hub. Mountain complex near Kuhestan Park, “Yazd Missile City.” Struck 5+ times. Launch on March 27 followed by a strike within hours. Activity continues at scale. Shiraz: Dispersed sites across Fars. Satellite shows a propellant leak and launcher fires. Launcher destroyed March 25. Failure recorded March 17. Isfahan: 6 zones active. Northern base hit with launcher explosion and building destruction. Tunnel cleared within 48 hours. Sofeh struck March 27. Failure March 20. Jam / Bushehr: IRGC Chamran base. 2 missile salvos. Struck 3+ times. Coastal launches enable varied trajectories. CONFIRMED OTHER SITES | IDF, CENTCOM, Satellite Kashan: Missile base near Aran va Bidgol, confirmed strikes Dezful: Missile base, 7+ buildings destroyed Kermanshah: Mobile launcher destroyed by IAF F-35 Panj Pelleh: MRBM base confirmed Kamijeh: MRBM base confirmed Mahidasht: IRGC base, 3 hardened shelters destroyed Khorramabad: Imam Ali base, bunker busters used, IRGC commander killed Bandar Abbas / Khorgu: Missile base struck Tabriz: IRGC Amand base, smoke confirmed Zanjan: Hidden launcher struck at civilian site Bidganeh / Malard: launch site struck Qom: Missile base, tunnels and structures destroyed Lar: Mobile launchers operating from a civilian site near “Lar Missile City” Hamedan: Failed launch observed No launches from central Tehran All activity from a 50 to 70 km perimeter ring REPORTED | NOT FULLY VERIFIED Larestan: Reported, no confirmation Damavand: Reported, no confirmation Meshkin Dasht: Reported, unconfirmed Miyaneh: Reported, unconfirmed Abhar: Reported, unconfirmed OTHER MISSLE/ DRONE SITES HIT Karaj: Missile plant, structural destruction confirmed Ahvaz: Drone base, runway cratered, heavy damage Qeshm Island: IRGC base, 19 buildings destroyed Pakdasht: Industrial zones Semnan / Shahroud: Solid fuel facility, engine sites hit Urmia: IRGC operational base struck Darab: Confirmed in strike wave DEGRADATION UPDATE 29 of ~30 known launch bases struck -Washington Post The following main missile production and propellant infrastructure were hit: Khojir: Major missile production and assembly complex near Tehran. Handles solid fuel production and missile components. Parchin: Military complex tied to explosives testing and warhead development. Also linked to missile and nuclear work. Hakimiyeh: Industrial and research area in eastern Tehran tied to missile components, electronics, and support infrastructure. Shahroud: Large missile and space complex. Key site for solid fuel engine production, testing, and long range missile development. ~350 of 470 launchers destroyed or disabled U.S. assessment: ~33% destroyed ~33% degraded or inaccessible TARGET BREAKDOWN ~400 medium-range ballistic missiles → Israel ~1,250 short-range ballistic missiles → Gulf states
- Sep 21, 2026
Hipótese verossímil: o caso do Master mostrará, cedo ou tarde, que o banco de Vorcaro era o banco a serviço do PCC e ele era apenas o testa de ferro bon vivant que, em troca de grana, fama e influência, fôra posto lá para corromper e comprometer tudo e todos. O futuro dirá.
- Oct 5, 2026
Foi só o Trump desligar a USAID, cercar Cuba e capturar Maduro que as coisas mudaram muito de rumo ou é impressão minha. Já diria o prof. Olavo: se você quer saber os planos ocultos da esquerda, veja o que eles te acusam publicamente de fazer. Interferência estrangeira?
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.4K interactions against 308K followers, an engagement rate of 1.44%. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 12.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Bernardo P Küster 🇧🇷's engagement rate on X?
- Bernardo P Küster 🇧🇷 (@bernardopkuster) has an engagement rate of 1.44%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 307,660 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.44%, Bernardo P Küster 🇧🇷 sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @bernardopkuster have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @bernardopkuster post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.