Back to @beomgyuhourly's profile

hourly beomgyu🌼 engagement report

@beomgyuhourly - 186K followers on X

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.37%
of 186K followers
Per impression
10.2%
6.7K views on a typical post
Reach
3.62%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
690
interactions (median)
Saved
0.549%
37 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 690 interactions against 186K followers, an engagement rate of 0.37%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 10.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #beomgyu, #ćƒœćƒ ć‚®ćƒ„, #ė²”ź·œ.

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026. Recurring tags: #beomgyu, #ćƒœćƒ ć‚®ćƒ„, #ė²”ź·œ.

Compared with accounts its own size

hourly beomgyu🌼's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.37%, hourly beomgyu🌼 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 91 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 202619x their median

    FINALLY DRIVER BEOMGYU🤯IN SPORTS CAR TOO https://t.co/Bdk4Ubvhwf

    10K2.2K1427991K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202610.0x their median

    my heart stopped beating https://t.co/Qp74bBVhgG

    5.8K98747553K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20269.4x their median

    ćƒœćƒ ć‚®ćƒ„xåŒ—ę‘åŒ ęµ· https://t.co/TneU5KTVCu

    5.9K52906470K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20265.7x their median

    261008 WEVERSE DM šŸ§øšŸ’¬ https://t.co/pLHyyuGRP4

    3.3K519014431K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20264.6x their median

    how beomgyu wanted to greet kento VS how he actually greeted him šŸ˜­šŸ¤ https://t.co/4uP2SmCOsz

    2.9K27503064K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20264.5x their median

    beomkai new selfie https://t.co/RlbI88fg4R

    2.6K43903421K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20263.9x their median

    sungchan mentioned beomgyu in fancall! šŸ‘¤ if you had to do a girl group dance for a year-end collab stage which 3 male idols would you pick? šŸ—£ļøbeomgyu and… sion! #ė²”ź·œ #BEOMGYU #ćƒœćƒ ć‚®ćƒ„ https://t.co/kIWkVaUaZq

    2.1K369018945K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.9x their median

    beomgyu’s excited face when kento invited him to his place 😭he immediately said yes https://t.co/mcio2pl9FB

    2.4K25212638K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20263.8x their median

    the prettiest barefaced ever… https://t.co/3rvw7GTDe3

    2.3K35201621K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.6x their median

    BEOMGYU INSTAGRAM UPDATE WITH YSL BEAUTY #ė²”ź·œ #BEOMGYU #ćƒœćƒ ć‚®ćƒ„ https://t.co/aPy8qH06J1

    2.1K36026238K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#beomgyu#ćƒœćƒ ć‚®ćƒ„#ė²”ź·œ#2ćÆćŠę„½ć—ćæć„ćŸć ć‘ć¾ć—ćŸć‹#åŒ—ę‘åŒ ęµ·

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 690 interactions against 186K followers, an engagement rate of 0.37%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 10.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #beomgyu, #ćƒœćƒ ć‚®ćƒ„, #ė²”ź·œ.

What is hourly beomgyu🌼's engagement rate on X?
hourly beomgyu🌼 (@beomgyuhourly) has an engagement rate of 0.37%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 186,324 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.37%, hourly beomgyu🌼 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @beomgyuhourly have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @beomgyuhourly post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going