Back to @basedbinkie's profile

BasedBinkie engagement report

@basedbinkie - 486K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.44%
of 486K followers
Per impression
8.87%
134K views on a typical post
Reach
27.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12K
interactions (median)
Saved
1.12%
1.5K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 12K interactions against 486K followers, an engagement rate of 2.44%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 134K times each, and 8.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 86K interactions, about 7.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chivalrystarved, #chivalrystarvedoc, #magilinart.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #chivalrystarved, #chivalrystarvedoc, #magilinart.

Compared with accounts its own size

BasedBinkie's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.44%, BasedBinkie sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 147 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 20267.2x their median

    Malfoid Confrontation https://t.co/TTutIqE6EF

    81K4.5K351831.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20265.3x their median

    Look at my Slytherin bruh, we ain’t making it out of hogwarts (I thought I’d try my hand on the Malfoy thing) https://t.co/wMStf70jnH

    58K3.9K25427445K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20265.3x their median

    Potion Seller I’m going into battle but I’m broke and need your cheapest potion https://t.co/4BJkxcj4wy

    58K3.8K41734772K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20265.0x their median

    Puppet Queen https://t.co/Aqk9zLYIkz

    55K3.7K343461.2M viewsView on X
  • Jan 28, 20253.7x their median

    Introducing Pierra Panini! Pippi’s mom to some, THE FOOL to others! A nuisance to all! https://t.co/dNG3oT5M3Q

    42K3.1K560541.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20263.8x their median

    Stand strong little hero https://t.co/77e2ojdg3N

    43K2.4K14713422K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.7x their median

    Question for you folks! How did you discover me? And why did you decide to stick around? https://t.co/ckcQ8sC1Wk

    29K1.1K2.4K18281K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.6x their median

    Authority's crown is too heavy to inherit https://t.co/jxHykCjAUK

    29K1.9K2066903K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20262.5x their median

    Envy: Fundamental of ambition and competition (But she's a bit of a meanie though) https://t.co/IS3oHiLaQE

    28K2.1K27114796K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20262.5x their median

    POV: You stare death in the face (But it's not your time) https://t.co/T4i3aqXRCd

    28K2.2K21015289K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#chivalrystarved#chivalrystarvedoc#magilinart

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12K interactions against 486K followers, an engagement rate of 2.44%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 134K times each, and 8.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 86K interactions, about 7.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chivalrystarved, #chivalrystarvedoc, #magilinart.

What is BasedBinkie's engagement rate on X?
BasedBinkie (@basedbinkie) has an engagement rate of 2.44%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 486,322 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.44%, BasedBinkie sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @basedbinkie have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @basedbinkie post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going