Back to @barnes_law's profile

Robert Barnes engagement report

@barnes_law - 366K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.385%
of 366K followers
Per impression
1.33%
106K views on a typical post
Reach
29.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
47 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 366K followers, an engagement rate of 0.385%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 106K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 119K interactions, about 85x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ar02, #midterms.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #ar02, #midterms.

Compared with accounts its own size

Robert Barnes's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.385%, Robert Barnes sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video69% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link38% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 38% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 234 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 12, 202685x their median

    Crowds gathered in Dublin to protest Trump’s visit to Ireland, with demonstrators using imagery featuring Trump, Epstein and Netanyahu to voice their criticism. https://t.co/FGrPgIZnr3

    101K14K1.9K3.0K36M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202617x their median

    Ukraine is a country of peace. And we truly respect the fact that our partners want to help bring this war to an end. We support every such effort. When the Americans asked us to pause strikes on Moscow and St. Petersburg on August 25, 26, and 27, we observed that pause. There were no strikes on Russia, while strikes on Ukraine continued. When another global power asked us to pause strikes in the direction of Vladivostok for a specified period of time, we agreed to ensure that as well. New meetings in Moscow are now being prepared, and we will take that into account. We always support every step toward peace – every step to prevent Russia from making this war endless. The war needs to end, and leaders are right to tell Putin this. So, for the sake of diplomacy and negotiations, whenever our partners approach us about this, we will ensure that Russian skies are cleared of drones for specified periods of time and along specified routes. Safety will return to Russia’s skies when there is real movement toward peace. For now, the skies over Russia are for drones – not for civilian aviation.

    19K3.7K1.5K2881.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20264.1x their median

    🔥This from Rand Paul's latest documents is a huge and shocking data point, worth further investigation. It suggests that the CIA and Pfizer knew they were lying to the public on the very need for a Covid shot at all. By the time of release, according to their own math, shared only privately, we would already have achieved herd immunity. On May 7, 2020, CIA Chief Operating Officer Andy Makridis led a briefing with Pfizer's Scott Gottlieb. The CIA summary of the meeting: "On 'herd immunity' Dr. Gottlieb...believes nationally, the seroprevalence is about 20-25% which is insufficient for herd immunity at the R₀ (BRR) value of 3." Screenshot attached. In the same time frame, he was telling the public it was low around 8%. Even 3.5 months later, August 16, 2020, he was STILL claiming a low seroprevalence rate nationally. Screenshots attached. What this means: both Gottlieb AND the CIA KNEW early on that endemicity would be obtained by the time of the shot release. They lied in public while telling the truth in private. https://t.co/cdt1wq0dld

    4.0K1.5K172154535K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.1x their median

    🚨Additional video @FBI edited from their $500,000 reward appeal for the J6 pipeb*mber. Clips that most obviously give away their scam … and that you were never intended to see.🚨 Anyone who has seen Brian Cole Jr. take as few as ten steps knows he is not the person in this video. (Nor the same gender.) No gait recognition software needed—just an honest FBI Director and US Attorney to put a stop to this farcical prosecution. More to come… *Video credit: Clallam County Sheriff, Port Angeles, WA #FreeBrianColeJr

    4.4K998288691.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20262.9x their median

    Terrorist images were found on Flydubai suspect Hamam al-Hammami's social media https://t.co/HG8vMeNbbw

    2.3K4421.0K3081.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.9x their median

    Just got this in the mail ... Is this REAL?! https://t.co/Fbhejc9ohP

    3.3K45126644679K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.6x their median

    We just signed @RepThomasMassie's discharge petition to force a vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act II.

    3.1K28426425361K viewsView on X
  • Apr 8, 20252.6x their median

    What members of VivaBarnesLaw get access to: 1/ Exclusive Q&A AMAs with @thevivafrei & I most weekdays that can go hours long in AfterParty shows w/ Viva & near nightly Bourbon w/ Barnes; 2/ Barnes Law School publications, videos, and articles detailing the inside of the legal system in MasterClass introductions and explanations of the law; 3/ Hush Hush alternative narrative explorations of some of the biggest historical events, including assassinations, world wars, global pandemics, famous crimes, and more; 4/ Barnes Brief weekly newsletters providing curated article libraries, substack-style informative arguments on high profile public issues, Art of the Day, book and film recommendations, and more; 5/ An extraordinary community of above-average folks concerned with law and politics in the modern world. https://t.co/pgTqsGiEIy

    2.2K819590413.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20261.8x their median

    Aramco in Riyadh is burning. https://t.co/jNINauv8HR

    2.1K3783641129K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026

    Iranian forces attacked another pair of tankers in the Strait of Hormuz today -UKMTO One of the tankers caught fire, though no crew were injured. Iran has now successfully struck 7 tankers in the Strait this week. https://t.co/TzcPxj10Kl

    1.2K1917521106K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ar02#midterms

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 366K followers, an engagement rate of 0.385%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 106K times each, and 1.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 119K interactions, about 85x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ar02, #midterms.

What is Robert Barnes's engagement rate on X?
Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) has an engagement rate of 0.385%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 365,945 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.385%, Robert Barnes sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @barnes_law have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @barnes_law post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going