Back to @balajis's profile

Balaji engagement report

@balajis - 2.3M followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.042%
of 2.3M followers
Per impression
0.913%
104K views on a typical post
Reach
4.58%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
947
interactions (median)
Saved
0.188%
195 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 947 interactions against 2.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Posts are seen about 104K times each, and 0.913% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, Balaji sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video43% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link43% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 312 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 25, 202621x their median

    Gonna try to explain this to tech CEOs again: Young Americans are pissed. They feel betrayed. Half have embraced the far right & want to cut off your access to cheap foreign labor. The other half have embraced the far left & want to cut off your head. One side will win. Choose.

    23K2.5K5111511.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202624x their median

    The 2000s were Anglophile. The 2010s were weeaboo. The 2020s are Sinophile. The 2030s are going to be all about Central Asia. The steppe. Bukhara. Samarkand. Herds of saiga. Mareโ€™s milk beer. Bookmark this.

    20K1.5K237341678K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 202615x their median

    International Physics Olympiad 2026, Top 30 countries: 1. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡ 1. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡ 1. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Kazakhstan โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡ 1. ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡ 1. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡ 1. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡ 7. ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ Vietnam โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ 8. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท Iran โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ 9. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ 10. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Israel โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ 10. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ 12. ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰ 12. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰ 14. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Indonesia โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰ 15. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ญ Thailand โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰๐ŸŽ–๏ธ 16. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰ 17. ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰๐ŸŽ–๏ธ 17. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰๐ŸŽ–๏ธ 19. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ Malaysia โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‰๐ŸŽ–๏ธ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ 20. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰ 21. ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania โ€” ๐Ÿฅ‡๐Ÿฅ‰๐ŸŽ–๏ธ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ 22. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Tรผrkiye โ€” ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ 23. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria โ€” ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰ 23. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mongolia โ€” ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰ 25. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan โ€” ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰ 25. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Belarus โ€” ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰ 25. ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany โ€” ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰ 25. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy โ€” ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰ 25. ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia โ€” ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰๐Ÿฅ‰ 30. ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary โ€” ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅˆ๐Ÿฅ‰

    13K1.3K367229996K viewsView on X
  • May 7, 20268.6x their median

    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: You can't earn a billion dollars. Ilana Glazer: That's right. AOC: You just can't earn that. Glazer: That's exactly correct. AOC: You can get market power. You can break rules. You can do all sorts of things.ย You can abuse labor laws. Glazer: Yup. AOC: You can pay people less than what they're worth. Glazer: Yup. AOC: But you can't earn that, right? Glazer: That's right. AOC: And so you have to create a myth that -- since you didn't earn that, you have to create a myth of earning it.

    5.2K7924.9K1.5K14M viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202611x their median

    India is building startup cities. https://t.co/aJUUSXjo1j

    8.6K5527644131.7M viewsView on X
  • May 12, 20265.0x their median

    The right kind of ambition is to compete against yourself. To be the best version of yourself.

    8.2K1.1K33194317K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20267.3x their median

    Should the global tech community continue investing in Malaysia? Given recent events, I raise this question respectfully for the consideration of Prime Minister Yang Amat Berhormat Datoโ€™ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim (@anwaribrahim), for the people of Malaysia, and for our friends in the Malaysian tech community. The answer will be of interest to anyone in global tech thatโ€™s considering building, investing, or expanding in Malaysia, including executives at Google, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft, founders of tech unicorns like Coinbase and Solana, and investors at the worldโ€™s largest venture capital funds like a16z and Polychain. As context, I am the former CTO of Coinbase and former General Partner at a16z. In October 2024, I opened a startup society called Network School in Malaysia, because I felt Iโ€™d been invited in by the governmentโ€™s pro-tech policies. Specifically, the KL20 initiative set out Malaysiaโ€™s ambition of becoming a top 20 global tech hub. Their MDEC digital nomad visas and MM2H investor visas were created to facilitate an influx of global talent and capital. And the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone was announced to facilitate the flow of capital and talent between Malaysia and Singapore, where I live. When taken in combination with Malaysiaโ€™s datacenter buildout and its policy of welcoming visa-free visits for 98% of the world, it seemed like Malaysia might be a great place to build a global tech hub that was simultaneously inexpensive and easy to visit (especially for non-Westerners). And thatโ€™s what we did, by creating Network School. Itโ€™s an international tech community with its first node in Forest City, Malaysia. We picked Forest City because it had millions of square feet of empty space, because it was one hour from Singaporeโ€™s capital markets, and because it was within the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone. Then, within 18 months, without a single penny of government money, we built Network School into a global attraction that brought thousands of engineers, investors, and builders from 70+ countries to learn technology, burn calories, earn online, and have fun, integrating with the local Malaysian economy along the way. Indeed, in terms of quantifiable contribution to the Malaysian economy, weโ€™ve already invested 100M+ MYR in our campus to make it startup-friendly. For perspective, thatโ€™s about 4% of the budget of Johor, the Malaysian state where Forest City is located. We employ dozens of Malaysians directly and indirectly at every level from executive to staff. Weโ€™ve backed Malaysian tech startups like Collektr, hosted events for local teams like Superteam Malaysia, and are major customers of many local businesses like barbers, laundromats, and restaurants. Weโ€™ve also revitalized the multibillion-dollar Forest City project, causing millions of MYR in real estate appreciation. And, as the video below describes, we were on the cusp of a 500M+ MYR expansion to grow our community, as well as a global merit scholarship with my friend Amjad Masad of Replit. However, that emerging multi-billion dollar success story โ€” which should rightfully have been hailed as a huge victory for the pro-tech policies of the Malaysian government โ€” is at risk of being derailed by a fake story spread by an anonymous account named MP4P. In short: on the day before the July 11 Johor elections, MP4P posted an Instagram post falsely accusing Network School of harboring illegal aliens. The sensational accusations caused a tizzy in Malaysia, until Malaysian authorities came to our campus on July 14 to investigate. (I should note that the officers were very polite and professional.) After checking hundreds of physical passports from 40 countries, including dual passport holders, the authorities confirmed to the press on July 15 that all travel documents were in order. During the process, we cooperated fully; in the thread below you can see a photo of the men, women, and children of Network School smiling and holding up their passports in the bright daylight. Our faces are shown and our names are known; we have nothing to hide. With that said, the process is the punishment. What MP4P did is very similar to the American crime of โ€œswattingโ€, because MP4P created a hoax report of a serious threat, thereby forcing the Malaysian police to take time away from protecting the Malaysian people towards investigating a nonexistent issue. Moreover, this anonymous MP4P account has also called for Malaysia to boycott Apple, Google, Amazon, and Microsoftโ€ฆa move that would cost ordinary Malaysians thousands of jobsโ€ฆeven while MP4Pโ€™s own Instagram collaborators promote their Apple and Google apps! I mean, we arenโ€™t talking about a credible accuser, but just someone screaming inconsistently at the top of their lungs on social media for traffic, an all-too-common phenomenon these days. Anyway, at this point, all further investment we were planning to make in Malaysia is on hold until we get sufficient assurance that such issues wonโ€™t recur. So are the investment plans of many of our friends, including the execs and investors at global tech firms that we brought to Forest City. Because to put it very plainly: we have invested 100M+ MYR in Malaysia, while creating jobs for dozens of Malaysians, and our faces and names are known. Our Malaysian executives and employees deserve the benefit of the doubt over anonymous internet trolls. There are two paths forward. In the first case, if Malaysia still wants continued global tech investment, if it wants to be a top 20 tech hub, if it wants us to revitalize Forest City, then we request an audience with the Prime Ministerโ€™s office to discuss the terms of a memorandum of understanding between Network School and the Malaysian government, similar to the document recently signed between the Solana Foundation and the Kazakhstan government. Specifics can of course be discussed, but we would publicly commit to abiding by all Malaysian laws (we already do) and respecting Malaysiaโ€™s sovereignty (never in question). In return, theyโ€™d get to know our friendly community, and realize that we actually chose Malaysia because we thought it was a great place to build a tech hub where engineers from the global South, investors from the West, and builders from Malaysia itself could meet new people, build cool things, and perhaps create millions of dollars in economic growth in the fullness of time. That vision of peace and trade, internationalism and entrepreneurialism, is still on the table. We arenโ€™t asking for any money โ€”ย just a meeting, to help restore confidence in Malaysia as an investable jurisdiction. Alternatively, if you donโ€™t want our investment, or those of our colleagues at billion dollar funds and trillion dollar companies, we will of course respect your wishes, and reallocate our capital to other countries instead. Either way, we will remain friends and abide by your decision. Please let us know.

    3.7K5461.4K1.2K4.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20266.6x their median

    I am pleased to announce that a memorandum of understanding has been signed between the Republic of Kazakhstan and Network School. Our new campus will become a haven for global techno-optimism, with expedited visas, streamlined redomiciliation, and active recruitment of talent. https://t.co/R20i8UAYoc

    4.4K4118975582.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20266.2x their median

    Welcoming Jensen Huang to Kazakhstan. The beginning of a digital state. https://t.co/eclyZNolIM

    5.3K20121784267K viewsView on X
  • May 23, 20264.2x their median

    Future books will be written monk-mode, by hand, completely offline, in digital monasteries purpose-built for focus.

    4.5K37624588256K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 947 interactions against 2.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Posts are seen about 104K times each, and 0.913% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 21x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Balaji's engagement rate on X?
Balaji (@balajis) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,266,336 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, Balaji sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @balajis have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @balajis post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going