Back to @axelar's profile

Axelar Network engagement report

@axelar - 208K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.066%
of 208K followers
Per impression
1.63%
8.5K views on a typical post
Reach
4.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
139
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 139 interactions against 208K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 1.63% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 7.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Axelar Network's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.066%, Axelar Network sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link41% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 41% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 297 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 4, 20267.2x their median

    The XRP Ledger and XRPL EVM Sidechain are now live on Axelar App, unlocking new routes for multiple assets to move across chains without friction. Supported tokens: XRP, SHx, USDf, SOIL, WETH, WBTC, mBTC, mTBILL, mXRP. https://t.co/10m0jImngO

    7601873322109K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20264.4x their median

    We're in Lisbon this weekend with a challenge for builders. 🇵🇹 Cross-chain automation hub: Hedera Schedule Service + Axelar General Message Passing. Build an automation platform using @hedera as the decentralized hub, scheduling and triggering smart contract calls on other chains, powered by Axelar. Build with us!

    5237016317K viewsView on X
  • Dec 15, 20253.7x their median

    Common Prefix is taking the lead stewardship role of Axelar. We are excited to share our plans for 2026, with more details to be announced in Q1. Our team consists of scientists–professors, PhDs, and post-docs–from world-renowned universities like Stanford, Imperial, ETH Zürich, and University of Edinburgh. But also senior engineers with decades of experience in hedge funds, TradFi, and Web3. We bridge the gap between science and engineering. We are razor-sharp focused on institutional adoption. For this, we will double down on the ecosystems that matter like XRPL, Sui, Solana, Ethereum, Stellar, and Hyperliquid. We will make sure that supported connections bring value to the ecosystem, and the right incentives for validators. For institutional, we need increased economic security. We’ll enable co-staking of blue chip tokens beyond just AXL. Privacy, compliance, and robustness will also be a theme for the year. For bridging, we will remove friction of moving assets from chain to chain by introducing gasless bridging. Subsidies will come from investing capital locked in gateway contracts, creating novel asset classes. Users will always have the choice to act according to their risk appetite. Lastly, we’re building up-the-stack in select key verticals: stablecoins, tokenized deposits, yield, and lending. A fusion of new chains creates an opportunity for new emerging asset classes.

    352617127348K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.6x their median

    We are pleased to welcome leading blockchain projects, university organizations, and local communities from across Korea as partners for Axelar & Friends. 📅 Oct 2, 2026 | 📍 Seoul Register now: https://t.co/MUHNe0xf9a https://t.co/MG6JUaa6v3

    46431618.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.2x their median

    $SHx is live on Axelar App. Users can now bridge @strongholdpay's SHx across Ethereum, Solana and the XRP Ledger, directly on https://t.co/eJWamuNGCg. https://t.co/2i7r7wb1Ef

    3537315737K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.5x their median

    We are proud to share that we have completed our XRP Ledger Batch Transactions Security Audit for @RippleXDev and @XRPLF. Full report: https://t.co/7vNWYBxskF 1/4 🧵 https://t.co/kLaUZIvT4Z

    2597281140K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.4x their median

    Swap $SOL on the XRPL DEX through @xpmarket, @First_Ledger, and @MagneticXRPL, or access it directly from your @XamanWallet via the Swap widget. Powered by Axelar. https://t.co/iWnE3m4qCU

    271576420K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20261.9x their median

    Axelar’s role in institutional tokenization has already been demonstrated globally: - Deutsche Bank specified Axelar in DAMA 2 as infrastructure for managed multichain token issuance. - In J.P. Morgan and Apollo’s Project Guardian PoC, Axelar connected assets across different ledgers to construct and rebalance a portfolio.

    2084314514K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.9x their median

    $AXL is now live on Axelar App. The native utility token that powers the Axelar network can now be bridged across 16 EVM chains, directly on https://t.co/BRxKMQNF4L. https://t.co/2cWJ9GB0U6

    2154010315K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.8x their median

    Reach the XRPL ecosystem from any connected chain in a few clicks. Available now on https://t.co/eJWamuNGCg https://t.co/GQGMEfNn5A

    20942419.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 139 interactions against 208K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 1.63% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 7.2x its own typical post.

What is Axelar Network's engagement rate on X?
Axelar Network (@axelar) has an engagement rate of 0.066%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 208,329 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.066%, Axelar Network sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @axelar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @axelar post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going