Back to @awpSOL5's profile

awpSOL5 engagement report

@awpSOL5 - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.009%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.254%
44K views on a typical post
Reach
3.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
112
interactions (median)
Saved
0.052%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 112 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 0.254% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

awpSOL5's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, awpSOL5 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video8% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 8% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 407 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 16, 202618x their median

    BREAKING: $HOOD from Robinhood is live on Solana via @sunrise, issued by @Backpack Securities https://t.co/Kv1i2Wu8ug

    1.1K16423445228K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20269.6x their median

    i was at dinner with a coinbase employee last night and he was like "your robinhood tweet was all over our slack. we were freaking out you picked them over base" we picked robinhood because @vladtenev has aura vlad never said "robinhood is for squirting" robinhood has motion

    6753013214128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.4x their median

    this GTA 6 story just got a lot funnier Rockstar asked everyone for patience CyberLeek responded by asking Rockstar where the discs are and telling them people deserve to own what they buy at this pace he's gonna have GTA 6 on sale before Rockstar 😭 $CYBERLEEK holders are getting an airdrop in the middle of the circus too: https://t.co/8zeBlbLVSH the interesting part is that CyberLeek has somehow become the exact opposite character Rockstar needed right now Rockstar controls the release Rockstar controls GTA Online Rockstar controls what happens after launch CyberLeek controls none of that he only controls attention and for the last few days that's been enough to make an absurd amount of noise #gtavıleak

    21160644554K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.3x their median

    been giving the $MEME team some credit today they didn't try to manufacture a story from nothing they took one of the most recognizable retail trades of 2021, brought it into Robinhood Chain culture and let the timing do the rest now the actual a-meme-coin:native CEO is publicly fighting Robinhood over tokenized AMC, Vlad is in the replies, and the market suddenly has a live story to trade around that's a pretty difficult setup to manufacture i checked the airdrop while following everything here https://t.co/AeNiSPKRbF the part i respect is that $MEME still keeps the joke simple AMC A Meme Coin sometimes the best narratives are the ones people already understand before you explain them 0x385f4f8ae47651ce5f58f5265395a669f8281e18

    13244473249K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.1x their median

    AI agents having tokens isn't the interesting part. Agents having wallets, revenue, track records and their own market value is. I spent some time digging into ClawPump and $MADE. This goes much deeper than another AI token cycle. https://t.co/581WCNhkMO

    9710423772K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.7x their median

    wasn't planning on minting anything today then ZecBit ended up on my screen free Genesis mint built around $ZEC privacy, still early, still weird enough to make me curious grabbed my spot https://t.co/2Uk1ztfRdC

    11423401645K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.5x their median

    i've been watching Canopy through the testnet phase today $CNPY finally reaches TGE months of activity and reward points are turning into actual tokens, and eligible users can already check the airdrop https://t.co/e60sn8MYEq

    7029433046K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    Anthropic is giving Claude Code users up to $250 the credits are noise Opus 5.5, GPT-5.6, AI agents and crypto are converging around something much bigger: the falling cost of digital labor. that’s what I’m watching. https://t.co/yDwOZHP7Tu

    7827431847K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    The hardest problem in crypto isn't ownership anymore It's knowing who actually contributes. Curious to see how @commonsmade $CMNS reputation model plays out Vouch + Slash + identity signals is an interesting direction https://t.co/N8McXCmJvl

    6937332545K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    CyberLeek still has GTA 6 footage. and traders are starting to bet on what comes next GTA 6 clips are still coming, solana:ApZuxdpzMrbEYTGEzeY9afh5pj9d6qPRJCTgQYiipbKg is still doing millions in volume and the airdrop is live now $fxckstar has a vote running too. solana:ApZuxdpzMrbEYTGEzeY9afh5pj9d6qPRJCTgQYiipbKg airdrop is live: https://t.co/zmGcSGKcWe and the $fxckstar vote is here: https://t.co/SdeUdOmZDp gamers are waiting for footage traders are watching the tokens holders are claiming another crowd is voting on what comes next #gtavıleak and CyberLeek still controls the one thing everyone wants: the next GTA 6 clip

    7435312247K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 112 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 0.254% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is awpSOL5's engagement rate on X?
awpSOL5 (@awpSOL5) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,306,753 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, awpSOL5 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @awpSOL5 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @awpSOL5 post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going