Back to @awkwardgoogle's profile

Interesting things engagement report

@awkwardgoogle - 4.0M followers on X

Measured over 170 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.031%
of 4.0M followers
Per impression
0.964%
128K views on a typical post
Reach
3.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.09%
116 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
8.23/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 4.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 170 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 128K times each, and 0.964% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 170 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 160K interactions, about 130x its own typical post.

Measured over 170 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Interesting things's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.031%, Interesting things sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,424 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,424 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,888 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 99 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 2026130x their median

    Throwback to when Ryan Reynolds found out filming was canceled and pulled this prank on his makeup team after 8 hours of work 💀 https://t.co/lNxWaVItjK

    158K1.3K3108617M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026130x their median

    Florida teacher fired after giving zeroes to students who didn't turn in their assignments https://t.co/UGGs710QmP

    150K7.3K1.8K83011M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026112x their median

    Travis, a writer, being acknowledged in public, seems to have made his day https://t.co/7X68Z3XWCA

    132K4.8K5713097.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202698x their median

    Baby goes viral for his extreme relaxation minutes after being born. https://t.co/5268hi1V3U

    102K12K2.5K4.2K12M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202687x their median

    Earthquake frequencies affect buildings of different heights https://t.co/GIBAnN5var

    96K10K4344909.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202683x their median

    A spider just built a web around a wasp nest, trapping them inside, while ants are actively raiding the larvae to stockpile for winter. https://t.co/Sx1R1DkYiL

    93K7.3K1.5K1.3K11M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202679x their median

    She saw the police and took her chance https://t.co/HwjNd1Ze5L

    93K4.1K261485.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202662x their median

    A Brazilian woman refused to give up her paid window seat to a child, got filmed, and went viral. While she faced initial backlash, public opinion strongly turned in her support. She is now suing the airline and the passenger for invasion of privacy. https://t.co/46LEmesAT6

    70K4.8K1.3K1882.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202662x their median

    In 1972, TV history gave us truly one of the most adorable moments ever broadcast https://t.co/MJvisxcqQ6

    71K5.1K31159210M viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202662x their median

    A grandma broke her nose while hiking, didn't want the helivac, and ended up spinning out of control. She won a $450,000 lawsuit. https://t.co/039I7RsMpI

    70K3.4K2.0K7199.4M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 4.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 170 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 128K times each, and 0.964% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 170 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 160K interactions, about 130x its own typical post.

What is Interesting things's engagement rate on X?
Interesting things (@awkwardgoogle) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 170 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,985,998 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.031%, Interesting things sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,424 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @awkwardgoogle have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @awkwardgoogle post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going