Back to @austinrampt's profile

Austin Rampt engagement report

@austinrampt - 113K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 113K followers
Per impression
0%
2.7K views on a typical post
Reach
2.40%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 113K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 152 interactions.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Austin Rampt's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Austin Rampt sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link36% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 219 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 27, 2025

    I know a lot of you guys only know me from crypto. That’s by design I suppose. But I had a past journey that was pretty rough. Today my book “One Last Hit” was published going through my life of addiction, fleeing the country to Mexico and subsequently finding a life of sobriety again. It isn’t a pretty tale but its an honest one. My hope is that someone out there struggling in the same way that I was will read it and find some hope. If I can find sobriety after everything then anyone can. I’m grateful and honestly more than a little nervous to share this story. Addiction is pretty ugly and I'm lucky that I made it out alive. Here is the link if you want to check it out: https://t.co/KSPcYYn85S

    1042225168K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    Ellie believes she has been given one more chance. The fear that another relapse could be the one she never comes back from is part of what keeps her sober. https://t.co/ifcNMn53Oj

    21002.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    Brain fog, anxiety, panic. Her doctor handed her an antidepressant. Leann Herron said no, researched her own symptoms, and used meditation, Reiki, somatic work and hypnotherapy to do in a year what she thinks therapy would have taken ten. Full episode with Leann Herron: https://t.co/hMWLElmNF5

    10102.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    One Last Hit #15 w/ Dave S | Dead on Arrival at 15, Clean 17 Years, Then He Blew It All Up https://t.co/wEwcv07rWN

    11003.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Everyone gets a buzz. What it did to me was different. It was the first time in my life things got quiet. Like I'd been walking around with a problem I didn't know I had.

    10103.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026

    An adult AuDHD diagnosis gave Ellie the missing explanation for a lifetime of feeling different. It also helped her understand why cocaine once felt like the answer. https://t.co/KebxUCf9O1

    10001.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    Ellie can rebuild money and trust. What she cannot recover are the memories she missed and the pain her children carried while she was using. https://t.co/VoxP7TSs6p

    10002.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    My dealer pointed a gun at me for three hours because he thought I disrespected his dog. Information without experience is like going to a restaurant and eating the menu. Full episode: https://t.co/1ZaFFXcDVy https://t.co/GPe2R0nQzb

    00103.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    My Kindle ebook, One Last Hit, is FREE on Amazon through Monday, September 28. If you read it, all I ask is that you leave an honest review. Get it here: https://t.co/BzML7i48HQ https://t.co/tZOLqezInL

    10002.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    She knew the brown paper bag her whole childhood. The day she found it under his truck seat again she chased her dad into a corner and threw the bottle at his head. Then she picked up her daughter and walked out for good. Full episode with Leann Herron: https://t.co/8uz9fHVobn https://t.co/LI1De6Ppdk

    10002.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 113K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 152 interactions.

What is Austin Rampt's engagement rate on X?
Austin Rampt (@austinrampt) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 113,492 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Austin Rampt sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @austinrampt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @austinrampt post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going