Back to @augustosnunes's profile

Augusto Nunes engagement report

@augustosnunes - 2.9M followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.513%
of 2.9M followers
Per impression
16.4%
90K views on a typical post
Reach
3.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
15K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.037%
33 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 15K interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.513%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 90K times each, and 16.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 3.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Augusto Nunes's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.513%, Augusto Nunes sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 200 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 29, 20263.6x their median

    Pela primeira vez na história deste país, uma primeira-dama viajou mais que o presidente da República. Tudo, claro, bancado pelos pagadores de impostos.

    36K6.0K27675240K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.6x their median

    Os documentos divulgados nesta terça-feira provam que Alexandre de Moraes vendeu, alugou ou arrendou seus serviços de proteção a bandidos enquanto condenava inocentes. É hora de mostrarmos que o ministro André Mendonça não está só

    32K6.8K39298181K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20262.4x their median

    Alexandre de Moraes está desde o dia 9 de dezembro sem explicar o contrato de R$ 129 milhões entre o escritório de advocacia de sua mulher, Viviane Barci, e o banqueiro corrupto Daniel Vorcaro. São 193 dias

    30K6.1K306101216K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.3x their median

    É preciso afastar de seus cargos Paulo Gonet, Andrei Rodrigues e Alexandre de Moraes. Que autoridade moral essa trinca tem para acusar alguém?

    29K4.7K62673135K viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 20262.7x their median

    Foi o ministro Gilmar Mendes quem soltou, por exemplo, Sérgio Cabral, condenado a mais de 400 anos de cadeia, sua mulher Adriana Ancelmo e o casal Garotinho. Mas jura que está inconformado com a piora da fauna política do Rio de Janeiro. Haja cinismo

    26K5.1K15763139K viewsView on X
  • May 8, 2026

    Jair Bolsonaro, generais e dezenas de outros brasileiros estão presos, acusados de “golpismo”. Enquanto isso, seguem em liberdade dezenas de participantes do maior golpe financeiro da história do Brasil. A propósito: quando os ministros do STF vão começar a prender colegas afundados nas bandalheiras do escândalo do Master?

    20K4.9K26588137K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20261.6x their median

    Enquanto não disser o que acha do contrato de R$ 129 milhões assinado por sua mulher e pelo banqueiro bandido Daniel Vorcaro, Alexandre de Moraes deveria ser proibido de julgar qualquer coisa por falta de autoridade moral

    20K3.7K38778159K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20261.5x their median

    O contrato assinado entre Viviane Barci e Daniel Vorcaro prova que o dono do falido Banco Master não contratou a mulher de Alexandre de Moraes - contratou a proteção do próprio ministro

    19K3.3K13836143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.5x their median

    APRENDA COM TANCREDO, MORAES Ganancioso e avarento, Alexandre de Moraes usou o escritório de advocacia da família para vender seus serviços de proteção a bandidos ao banqueiro falido Daniel Vorcaro. Preço: R$131 milhões de reais divididos em gordas prestações por três anos. Achou pouco. Começou a negociar um segundo contrato com o mesmo freguês. Valor da facada consecutiva: R$50 milhões de reais. Achou pouco. Exigiu para os filhos dois cartões de crédito do banco Master, ambos com limite de R$300 mil reais. Logo Moraes terá tempo de sobra para ler ensinamentos oferecidos por quem tem mais que cifrões na cabeça. A primeira deveria ser a frase de Tancredo Neves: “A esperteza, quando é muita, fica grande e come o dono”

    19K3.6K16848171K viewsView on X
  • May 22, 2026

    Não é necessária a delação de Daniel Vorcaro para confirmar, por exemplo, o envolvimento de Alexandre de Moraes no escâncalo do Master. Isso já está mais que comprovado

    19K3.3K46451136K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 15K interactions against 2.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.513%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 90K times each, and 16.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 3.6x its own typical post.

What is Augusto Nunes's engagement rate on X?
Augusto Nunes (@augustosnunes) has an engagement rate of 0.513%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,868,190 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.513%, Augusto Nunes sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @augustosnunes have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @augustosnunes post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going