Trizzy Gillespie engagement report
@atrak - 300K followers on X
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 300K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.171% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 214x its own typical post.
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Trizzy Gillespie's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, Trizzy Gillespie sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 13% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 7% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 86 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 19, 2026214x their median
Andrew and Tristan Tate were just ARRESTED in Miami by US Marshals 😳 via TMZ https://t.co/U1OmJmUASx
- Jul 17, 202682x their median
What would you like to see Christopher Nolan direct next?
- Jul 29, 2026157x their median
RIP Kavinsky RIP Mehdi https://t.co/HRq2xAqQmy
- Jul 14, 202632x their median
Which 4 hip-hop groups are on your Mount Rushmore? https://t.co/NPMgfWOAzV
- Jul 31, 202631x their median
2007 shit RIP KAVINSKY RIP MEHDI RIP DUST LA ROCK https://t.co/1qQWwwuVfj
- Jul 22, 202623x their median
Who is the best opening act you've ever seen before the main headliner?
- Jun 18, 20269.1x their median
Legend has it. https://t.co/3LCx0xcUAs
- Oct 11, 202315x their median
Ok. Fool’s Gold 15th anniversary vinyl-only compilation. @runjewels @xdannyxbrownx @congorock @yehme2 @annalunoe @UNIIQU3 @HighKlassified & more https://t.co/4U9Q9tb91C https://t.co/3pXid0gvCX
- Sep 5, 202612x their median
The brothers https://t.co/fTJXyMTJ0B
- Sep 25, 20265.3x their median
The funny thing about the “real Gs move in silence like lasagna” line is that most Gs are silent in Italian Real Gs move in silence like biglietti We’re not even supposed to pronounce the G in tagliatelle These are the things I think about
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 300K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.171% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 214x its own typical post.
- What is Trizzy Gillespie's engagement rate on X?
- Trizzy Gillespie (@atrak) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 300,343 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, Trizzy Gillespie sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @atrak have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @atrak post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.