Back to @astitvam's profile

Chakravarty Sulibele engagement report

@astitvam - 345K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.097%
of 345K followers
Per impression
3.09%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
3.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
334
interactions (median)
Saved
0.079%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 334 interactions against 345K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 6.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Chakravarty Sulibele's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.097%, Chakravarty Sulibele sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 171 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 25, 20266.5x their median

    Thank you friends 😂🫡 300+ million views in 24 hours!! A new record in Instagram.. Dargaya? #JustAsking #JantarMantar https://t.co/RMJSs2iNf5

    1.8K2051952737K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20263.5x their median

    Mood of the nation.. https://t.co/g2EWXVf7zd

    98613155728K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.4x their median

    🚨 KAPIL SIBAL - Amit Shah ji has made a very dangerous statement. "Congress Working Committee has decided that the remaining four stanzas of Vande Mataram would not be sung" "It was decided in 1950 by the Constituent Assembly that only the first two stanzas would be sung, as the remaining two stanzas contain certain RELIGIOUS REFERENCES that were opposed" "Amit Shah ji has stated that this decision of the Congress Working Committee is ‘anti-national’" https://t.co/sB21OpcNW6

    79512219429242K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.8x their median

    What a finish! A breathtaking performance at the end to secure the win against the Chinese athlete.. https://t.co/xmzGjY1fDv

    7911348514K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.6x their median

    ಇದನ್ನ ಡೆಲ್ಲಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಮಾಡಬೇಕು ಅಂತಿದ್ರು.. ಆಗಲಿಲ್ಲ. ಸ್ಪೇನ್ ಬಲಿಯಾಯ್ತು.. https://t.co/Jv4qzO9Yhk

    72011929329K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20262.6x their median

    "Narendra Modi is the best leader India has ever produced. It is hard to imagine finding such a leader hereafter." – Veteran Actor #AnantNag sharing his thoughts at a book launch event in Bengaluru today. https://t.co/yaXuc8bZtv

    7278641516K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20262.4x their median

    BDO Ritesh Kumar was hit by weighing weight of a vegetable shop. He is critical now! #Cockroach for a reason.. https://t.co/hc1FrrqgvB

    5482603416K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.3x their median

    What a historic milestone! Sri Ganapathy Sachchidananda Swamiji of Avadhoota Datta Peetham, Mysuru, recently marked the 50th anniversary of His spiritual journey with a monumental, awe-inspiring Bhagavad Gita recitation in Texas, USA. 🙏 https://t.co/5NvMIoEij0

    6621001111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.0x their median

    Lovely explanation. Anyone can understand 👏 https://t.co/QJp4G0qJSe

    5131366213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.6x their median

    Save GuruGanga.. Jayasimha Nagar, Beedar https://t.co/YuSNYUCWYi

    435778210K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 334 interactions against 345K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 6.5x its own typical post.

What is Chakravarty Sulibele's engagement rate on X?
Chakravarty Sulibele (@astitvam) has an engagement rate of 0.097%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 344,649 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.097%, Chakravarty Sulibele sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @astitvam have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @astitvam post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going