asparagoid engagement report
@asparagoid - 339K followers on X
Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 148 interactions against 339K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 303x its own typical post.
Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
asparagoid's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.044%, asparagoid sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 33% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 4% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 354 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 17, 2026303x their median
WATCH: Hayden Panettiere says she was 18 when a woman she trusted as a protector took her below deck on a yacht and physically put her in bed beside an undressed “very famous” man. “By the time I’d realized I was in danger, I was quite literally out to sea.” “She physically put me in the bed next to this undressed man who was very famous.” “My hair stood on end and I became ferocious. I was like, ‘This is not happening.’” “I bolted and hid wherever I could think of to hide on a boat. There was no jumping off and swimming away.” “When you really find somebody that you trust, you hold on to them for dear life. So to be betrayed like that is just an awful feeling.”
- Aug 16, 2026200x their median
I hate the idea of ex girlfriends. I have never stopping loving any woman even after breaking up with them. Girls should be something you collect slowly one by one. I just want to keep them all in a big castle together. I wish they could all just get along. They could be so happy
- Aug 26, 202685x their median
Long Jump from Mini-Pi robot. Doing their best already. https://t.co/Jdx6xlva6g
- Aug 24, 202669x their median
Amazing things are happening in the black community https://t.co/rPEpvVOwsm
- Aug 22, 202652x their median
One of my strongest convictions is that the world is a giant machine constructed to humiliate you for not taking action. 3 quick examples: - You're thinking of starting a business The most stupid, 80 IQ, visionless, incompetent people are currently running businesses making millions of dollars. This applies to every domain of business. As you get more business experience, you see it more and more and more. Reality specifically installed these people to make it clear you have zero excuses - You start running or lifting Start running and you'll encounter much older, much fatter individuals passing you at great speed. Start lifting and you'll encounter absolute genetic disasters lifting twice what you can and looking infinitely better. Reality specifically installed these people to point out that you can go infinitely further if you put in even a fraction of the effort they did - You want a girlfriend but are insecure You walk the street and look closely at couples. The ugliest, balding, short, high-pitched voice, poor and otherwise "low status" infidels are walking around with girls who are in love with them. Reality specifically installed these people to point out that your fears and inaction has no logical basis in reality --- This same thing applies everywhere, in all of life Look carefully anywhere and you will see the same thing Reality has been constructed carefully by a benevolent trickster God specifically to humiliate you for not taking action The worst sin of all is inaction and lack of courage Out of love, he finds every possible way to point out that even a tiny quantity of action can outperform almost everything. And makes that clear by showing that the most incompetent and ugly freaks succeed far beyond you when they keep taking basic steps forward So you have no excuse at all
- Sep 27, 202651x their median
“Don’t judge a book by its cover” I’ve never been wrong ever in my entire life about someone who I judged immediately based on their appearance
- Sep 9, 202638x their median
Who's excited for the 25th anniversary of 9/11? https://t.co/514qnOvxcT
- Aug 28, 202638x their median
I was at a cafe and I accidentally made eye contact with this stray kitty... he lives with me now https://t.co/sSIDvGBide
- Aug 26, 202613x their median
A New World Record 🤯 8.8 → 8.6 💨 in less than 3 days we’ve gone from +11 seconds to 8.6 seconds on the 100m sprint for humanoid robots. Wild times. https://t.co/2BttgASzlP
- Oct 3, 202611x their median
our entire reality is now under question new study examines as ai detection gets better and better, its finding synthetic data further back in time on a linear scale it now suggests a lot of the early 2000's were generated even extending into the 1990s including Nirvana https://t.co/FRoDrujbkY
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 148 interactions against 339K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 303x its own typical post.
- What is asparagoid's engagement rate on X?
- asparagoid (@asparagoid) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 339,094 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.044%, asparagoid sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @asparagoid have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @asparagoid post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.67 posts per day across the measured window.