asparagoid engagement report
@asparagoid - 339K followers on X
Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 181 interactions against 339K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 248x its own typical post.
Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
asparagoid's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.054%, asparagoid sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 43% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 462 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 17, 2026248x their median
WATCH: Hayden Panettiere says she was 18 when a woman she trusted as a protector took her below deck on a yacht and physically put her in bed beside an undressed “very famous” man. “By the time I’d realized I was in danger, I was quite literally out to sea.” “She physically put me in the bed next to this undressed man who was very famous.” “My hair stood on end and I became ferocious. I was like, ‘This is not happening.’” “I bolted and hid wherever I could think of to hide on a boat. There was no jumping off and swimming away.” “When you really find somebody that you trust, you hold on to them for dear life. So to be betrayed like that is just an awful feeling.”
- Aug 16, 2026163x their median
I hate the idea of ex girlfriends. I have never stopping loving any woman even after breaking up with them. Girls should be something you collect slowly one by one. I just want to keep them all in a big castle together. I wish they could all just get along. They could be so happy
- Aug 26, 202670x their median
Long Jump from Mini-Pi robot. Doing their best already. https://t.co/Jdx6xlva6g
- Aug 24, 202657x their median
Amazing things are happening in the black community https://t.co/rPEpvVOwsm
- Aug 22, 202643x their median
One of my strongest convictions is that the world is a giant machine constructed to humiliate you for not taking action. 3 quick examples: - You're thinking of starting a business The most stupid, 80 IQ, visionless, incompetent people are currently running businesses making millions of dollars. This applies to every domain of business. As you get more business experience, you see it more and more and more. Reality specifically installed these people to make it clear you have zero excuses - You start running or lifting Start running and you'll encounter much older, much fatter individuals passing you at great speed. Start lifting and you'll encounter absolute genetic disasters lifting twice what you can and looking infinitely better. Reality specifically installed these people to point out that you can go infinitely further if you put in even a fraction of the effort they did - You want a girlfriend but are insecure You walk the street and look closely at couples. The ugliest, balding, short, high-pitched voice, poor and otherwise "low status" infidels are walking around with girls who are in love with them. Reality specifically installed these people to point out that your fears and inaction has no logical basis in reality --- This same thing applies everywhere, in all of life Look carefully anywhere and you will see the same thing Reality has been constructed carefully by a benevolent trickster God specifically to humiliate you for not taking action The worst sin of all is inaction and lack of courage Out of love, he finds every possible way to point out that even a tiny quantity of action can outperform almost everything. And makes that clear by showing that the most incompetent and ugly freaks succeed far beyond you when they keep taking basic steps forward So you have no excuse at all
- Aug 28, 202631x their median
I was at a cafe and I accidentally made eye contact with this stray kitty... he lives with me now https://t.co/sSIDvGBide
- Aug 26, 202611x their median
A New World Record 🤯 8.8 → 8.6 💨 in less than 3 days we’ve gone from +11 seconds to 8.6 seconds on the 100m sprint for humanoid robots. Wild times. https://t.co/2BttgASzlP
- May 25, 20245.6x their median
HOW TO FIND TRUSTWORTHY PEOPLE ONLINE: In crypto and anon culture, 98% of people cannot be trusted. The default mindset is PVP and exploiting others. Many seem trustworthy, but quickly switch the moment they see an opportunity to screw you for a few dollars This is a huge problem because creating meaningful projects and businesses online requires teamwork, yet it’s easy to make the mistake of working with people who will become a nightmare later on Fortunately, there is 1 way to find good people This problem is best solved by observing what people do on the timeline when there is no direct financial incentive, in both their creative process and their appreciation of others The most trustworthy people on twitter are those who shitpost with the least agenda — but instead for the inherent joy of posting itself The 98% of PVP people described before have no ability to understand why others would do this, as well as no capacity to tap into this mode of being themselves PVP people live in the mode of seeking outcomes, particularly financial ones. For them, every action in the present is a means to a specific end. They are at point A, and all that matters is getting to point B Not only do they think this way, but they also continually project this mental frame onto everyone else’s words and actions. If a PVP person reads a great shitpost, their mind will try extremely hard to find an agenda, or believe that the person must be covertly marketing something, performing an elaborate scheme to get money, and so on. This is because the only way they could imagine doing something similar is if it led to money They cannot ever grasp the idea of engaging in a creative act for its own joy — or that the process can be its own fulfilment. It is completely outside of their reality, and it’s likely they will never touch it for even a second Shitposters of the most noble kind are driven by a core love of freedom and humor. These qualities are both the north star they move towards and the place from which they speak Good shitposters mercilessly destroy all concepts, beliefs and rationalizations the reader has about himself, others and world. The shitposter intuits the absurdity of thought in relation to reality, and stretches each aspect of it into a grotesque caricature so that it can be held up for all and hopefully seen clearly for what it truly is Each deconstruction of concepts and beliefs is so funny because it always points to underlying freedom. The joy of both writing and fully appreciating a good shitpost is a deep exhalation, the letting go of a mental contraction that causes suffering in most humans Surrendering to a shitposters way of seeing necessitates a deep loosening of one’s being. To appreciate the humor, you must let go and step beyond your own thoughts. The degree to which you love freedom at heart is equal to the degree you will laugh. And the degree to which you are attached to your thoughts is the degree to which you will rage, block, and fail to understand Trustworthy people find each other easily online because they recognize that they post for similar reasons. They are significantly more trustworthy because they share similar values, and greed is orders of magnitude down their list The crucial thing is that priorities cannot be expressed in words, because anyone can say they love freedom, humor and art. Instead, it’s what the person does in their spare moments over time that matters. Nobody can fake an authentic expression of core values over a long timeline, and if they can, they deserve to scam me When I am hiring or working with someone, I scroll their tweets. I couldn’t care less what they say to me or their achievements. If I sense a deep love of these qualities, then it’s an easy choice Discovering these people is in many ways the purpose of my account, and it’s been one of the best things I’ve ever done. There are beautiful people out there. To find them, you just need to be beautiful too
- Aug 17, 20264.8x their median
This is kind of strange to admit, but I'm in love with every woman in the world. I fell in love with a girl for the first time when I was 15. Then another at 18. Then another at 21. Then it kept on going. The interesting thing is I never stopped loving any of them. The only reason I broke up with them was that unnecessary drama levels got too high. I have a preference for peace. But I definitely never stopped loving them. Then I fell in love with a new girl, my love for the last one never diminished in any way. I can tune into it now. All I need to do is think of them and it comes back just as strong. I used to think love was something between 2 people. Or that you could only really be in love with 1 person at a time. But now, I can't see how that can possibly be true. I love them all. And as I got older, I realized that it's not about specific woman. It's that when I got to know any woman well enough, I started to clearly perceive what is lovable in them. Their essential girlness. You could call it feminine energy. You could call it the divinity in them or be more mystical. But whatever it is, I'm in love with it. It was never different girls I was in love with. It was the same energy shining through all of their eyes and speaking through all of their mouths. So I started to pay closer attention to more women, then I fell in love with them too. And it's gotten to the point now where I've practiced seeing the divinity in women so much that I can see a girl on the street or on the train and I just fall in love with her immediately. I'm just completely in love. Then I go see the girl I started dating and I don't mention it out loud, but the truth is that earlier today I fell in love with hundreds of women. And not only this, but I still love all the women from my past. And if she knew the truth she'd probably be horrified. But I can't stop it, it's like I crossed some kind of threshold where I paid attention so deeply that I can no longer unsee what is lovable. One glance and I'm in love. So I just keep it all secret from her and confess my secrets here on X instead
- Sep 2, 20263.4x their median
I accept full responsibility for the selling that took BASECAT from $38M to $25M over the last 48 hours An open letter to Brian, Jesse and Cobie: https://t.co/aGYCEGFmbK
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 181 interactions against 339K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.40% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 45K interactions, about 248x its own typical post.
- What is asparagoid's engagement rate on X?
- asparagoid (@asparagoid) has an engagement rate of 0.054%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 338,655 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.054%, asparagoid sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @asparagoid have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @asparagoid post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.