Fernando Arreaza Ortega engagement report
@arreazaortega - 214K followers on X
Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 214K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 0.538% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 673x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mlb, #fightinfish, #loandepotpark.
Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #mlb, #fightinfish, #loandepotpark.
Compared with accounts its own size
Fernando Arreaza Ortega's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.009%, Fernando Arreaza Ortega sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 44% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 291 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 27, 2026673x their median
Justin Verlander faced Julio Franco (born in 1958). Justin Verlander faced Konnor Griffin (born in 2006).
- Sep 24, 2026180x their median
Brewers Manager Pat Murphy said this after playing the White Sox in the second game of the season on March 28th👇 “Mark my word…that Chicago White Sox team will be somebody to be reckoned with in that division.” Today they clinched a playoff spot, and the division is in reach. https://t.co/mebgNYJbQt
- Aug 27, 202673x their median
Poner de bateador emergente a alguien que tenía de 76-5 (066) y que responda soltando esta línea, es una manifestación de lo apasionante que es el baseball. Por lo impredecible #MLB. La alegría de los compañeros de Ha-Seong Kim #BravesCountey, tiene que ver con el triunfo del equipo dejando en el terreno a los #Dodgers, pero tal vez más porque un compañero que la estaba pasando muy mal, dió el batazo. https://t.co/mRYfBvhD0C
- Oct 3, 202670x their median
Cuando uno menos lo espera se aclara y se zanja un asunto. Nos reconocimos con la cordialidad de siempre. Como cuando lo entrevisté por primera vez siendo un novato y así a lo largo de los años. Cuando un encuentro casual, deriva en un apretón de manos. Respeto y admiración intactos @SalvadorPerez15.
- Sep 26, 202668x their median
Sencillamente emocionante. https://t.co/nLP2WbNaqR
- Aug 28, 202653x their median
Una de las mejores respuestas de la historia. Lanzaste un envío en 100 millas por primera vez en 8 años, ¿cómo? Con mi brazo. #MLB. https://t.co/k4M9vxF0GK
- Sep 17, 202638x their median
Hace 6 meses... La historia que escribimos todos https://t.co/xNgRCsrGQl
- Sep 1, 202638x their median
Increíble, robar un jonrón que significa una victoria. De haberse ido, los #Rockies dejaban en el terreno a #Birdland. Baltimore se pone en 69 y 69 y se acerca a medio juego del tercer comodín. A estas alturas, con una situación tan estrecha y reñida, está claro que esa jugada de Colton Cowser, cobra una dimensión especial #MLB. https://t.co/dRPJzv5uoW
- Sep 11, 202637x their median
Trabajar duro, siempre rinde dividendos. Anthony Volpe fue a Triple A, luego de 3 años como el SS de los #Yankees, asumió el reto, trabajó duro para volver y en su partido de vuelta conectó de 4-3 con grand slam. Esa misma afición que fue dura con él, ahora lo aclama. https://t.co/LPKJnIYWd9
- Sep 2, 202629x their median
Para ponerlo en contexto. Haber alcanzado 200 (HR) y 200 (BR) en 904 juegos, ya es un récord en la historia de #MLB de menor cantidad de encuentros para lograr esas dos cifras. De no haber sido por las lesiones, Ronald Acuña Jr. #BravesCountry hubiera logrado la marca en al menos 200 juegos menos. El récord anterior era de Alfonso Soriano en 929 juegos.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 214K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 0.538% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.69% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 673x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mlb, #fightinfish, #loandepotpark.
- What is Fernando Arreaza Ortega's engagement rate on X?
- Fernando Arreaza Ortega (@arreazaortega) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 62 original posts from the last 30 days against 214,466 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.009%, Fernando Arreaza Ortega sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @arreazaortega have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @arreazaortega post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.