Back to @arcus_xyz's profile

Arcus engagement report

@arcus_xyz - 371K followers on X

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.061%
of 371K followers
Per impression
1.51%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
4.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
231
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.27/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 231 interactions against 371K followers, an engagement rate of 0.061%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 1.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.7K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Arcus's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.061%, Arcus sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link21% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202633x their median

    this is not a phase

    5.9K655846296838K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20269.6x their median

    The time has come. Arcus Points are live. Season 0: already settled and ranked. Connect your wallet to see where you landed. Season 1: begins now. https://t.co/DR0zk1tavD

    1.3K173369346408K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20267.2x their median

    big week ahead.

    1.1K72303204264K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20266.9x their median

    You're gonna want to turn on notifs btw. Jussayin, ya kno? https://t.co/PEEI8Uqrdm

    1.2K562944675K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20266.1x their median

    We owe the community a clear update on Arcus Points. Over the past few days, some of our own messages about the program were not as clear as they could have been. This post is the definitive version - nothing about the program itself has changed: 1. Weekly distribution: Season 1 points are fixed at 250K per week. This amount does not change with platform growth or adoption. 2. Transparency: For Season 1, you'll see your individual points and the weekly total on the Points Dashboard, updated with every weekly distribution (updates on Wednesday 3PM EST). 3. Season 0: S0 points remain redacted for now and will be revealed at a later date. 4. End date: The Arcus Points program will conclude no later than the end of H1 2027. Most of the program is still ahead, and you are still early. 5. For transparency, we've also updated the Introducing Arcus Points blog post to reflect all of the above (https://t.co/D0exBQVJY7). Thank you as well for the feedback on the referral and invite code program. We'll be shipping an updated system in the new week.

    88498235192104K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20264.9x their median

    The world's deepest capital markets. Open to everyone. 24/7. In partnership with @RobinhoodCrypto. Built for the rest of us. This is Arcus ➢ https://t.co/T9zODpwhmT https://t.co/l0ndagH8md

    79315513849162K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20263.9x their median

    Arcus is now integrated into @RobinhoodCrypto Wallet for Stock Token spot trading. Users can access 190+ Stock Tokens via Arcus' liquidity and execution infrastructure, and may earn boosted Arcus Points on eligible trades. Same infrastructure. Wider access ↓ https://t.co/8awFb0A4NM

    7104711240116K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.4x their median

    $USELESS perpetuals are now live on Arcus. Up to 10x leverage. https://t.co/FxteMosbdG

    5854613222125K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.6x their median

    $1B in volume. still in beta. that's all you 🤝 the real number's still ahead of us. https://t.co/xIC03r2W7m

    44832913677K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.6x their median

    $PONS perpetuals are now live on Arcus. Up to 4x leverage. https://t.co/z6S7e0tKak

    45127971628K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 231 interactions against 371K followers, an engagement rate of 0.061%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 1.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.7K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

What is Arcus's engagement rate on X?
Arcus (@arcus_xyz) has an engagement rate of 0.061%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 371,067 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.061%, Arcus sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @arcus_xyz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @arcus_xyz post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going