Back to @archaeologyart's profile

Archaeology & Art engagement report

@archaeologyart - 757K followers on X

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.122%
of 757K followers
Per impression
3.70%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
3.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
927
interactions (median)
Saved
0.411%
103 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.7/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 927 interactions against 757K followers, an engagement rate of 0.122%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 3.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.8K interactions, about 8.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Archaeology & Art's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 86% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.122%, Archaeology & Art sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.437%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 20268.4x their median

    The Forerunner (1894) by Eugène Trigoulet https://t.co/s7fmgqPvvM

    6.9K8561248132K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.9x their median

    A Kimono decorated with skeletons, from Japan, 1840-1860 CE, now housed at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London https://t.co/W3G6wyjRTC

    2.9K648168494K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.5x their median

    A woman and girl walk through a honeycomb of stone walls to get water from a pump, Inishmaan, the Aran Islands, 1971 Photo by Winfield Parks for National Geographic https://t.co/fsyG1i3XyX

    2.8K3972115112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.0x their median

    “Sunrise: Water Nymphs” (1920), Arthur Prince Spear https://t.co/WPVOUDh0lg

    2.3K46271443K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.0x their median

    Elixirs of Absence by Hisham Echafaki https://t.co/bQC5OYHLif

    2.3K49571142K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.9x their median

    Utagawa Hiroshige, Cats, 1890 https://t.co/Hkzv8DKCKt

    2.2K39721033K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.7x their median

    Flags of the funeral procession "Memento Mori" (19th-20th centuries) https://t.co/T1ALpvn1f0

    2.1K44451046K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.5x their median

    Rabbits, 1933 by Jean Charlot (French, 1898–1979) https://t.co/F15N4JvGnx

    1.9K37331444K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.5x their median

    Eros and Psyche, Gustav Vigeland, before 1904. https://t.co/wZEv7Fj78I

    1.9K39921140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.2x their median

    Satan Views the Whole of Eden, Gustave Dore https://t.co/vjr7Mk7zok

    1.7K343111832K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 927 interactions against 757K followers, an engagement rate of 0.122%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 3.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.8K interactions, about 8.4x its own typical post.

What is Archaeology & Art's engagement rate on X?
Archaeology & Art (@archaeologyart) has an engagement rate of 0.122%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 756,894 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.122%, Archaeology & Art sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @archaeologyart have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @archaeologyart post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going