Aoleon Martian Girl engagement report
@aoleontmg - 95K followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Posts are seen about 242 times each, and 0.826% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.254% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 17461x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, Aoleon Martian Girl sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 131 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 1, 202617461x their median
At the deepest level of suffering that a human can experience, @MrsErikaKirk pointed to Jesus Christ and expressed her enduring faith in Him. Untold numbers accepted Christ as Savior because her moment of suffering was redirected into His moment of suffering. I am appalled by the attacks on Erika Kirk. I know that Satan will always attack the most valiant warriors for the Kingdom. As Brothers and Sisters in Christ, let’s continue to lift up the Kirk family in our prayers.
- Apr 29, 202617372x their median
CONSEQUENCE unveils their list of best vocalists of all time: #1. Freddie Mercury #2. Aretha Franklin #3. Whitney Houston #4. Marvin Gaye #5. Robert Plant #6. Beyoncé #7. Ella Fitzgerald #8. Mike Patton #9. Michael Jackson #10. H.R. #11. Roy Orbison #12. Nina Simone #13. Rob Halford #14. Ray Charles #15. Mariah Carey #16. Hank Williams #17. James Brown #18. Adele #19. Chris Cornell #20. Kendrick Lamar
- Apr 26, 20263377x their median
Depuis tout à l'heure je me renseigne sur les idées de Karl Marx sincèrement je n'arrive pas à comprendre comment on peut être pour le capitalisme et même plus généralement être de droite
- Jun 28, 20261193x their median
Physicist Successfully Demonstrates the Origin of Time Giovanni Barontini from the University of Birmingham, UK, has used a cloud of cold atoms to test the origin of time. This is an interesting contribution to the long-standing question of how to define time in a non-circular way (time is what a clock measures and a clock is what measures time). One of the proposed solutions is to define time in quantum physics from the interaction of two different subsystems. This interaction, so the idea, introduces an oscillation that serves as the ‘tick’ of the clock. If that was so, then time would be purely ‘relational’ — an emergent, derived quantity — rather than (as in Einstein’s theory), a fundamental property of the universe. Barontini used about 24,000 ultracold rubidium atoms in a trap split by a thin light barrier into an observed “bright” part and an unobserved “dark” part. Atoms could move between the two, so the bright part expanded and collapsed in repeated cycles, rather like a toy version of a big bang and big crunch. Barontini then defined an internal “entropic time” from how the entropy of the bright part changed as atoms moved in and out. This internal time ordered the observed events almost as well as laboratory time. This experiment lends support to the idea that time is not fundamental, but emerges from interactions between parts of a closed system, though one may ask how interactions can change a system if there is not already a time for them to change in, but then maybe that’s just Sabine being grumpy again. Image: The device, called a ‘trap’, that holds the cloud of cold atoms in place using a combination of lasers and magnetic fields. Credits: Giovanni Barontini/University of Birmingham
- May 4, 20261108x their median
Name a song that is longer than 10 minutes you consider a masterpiece. I'll start: Telegraph Road, by Dire Straits https://t.co/kLcRw2cLsZ
- May 9, 2026597x their median
I want to share a thought about all the alien talk only because I never hear other Christians discuss it and I think it's interesting. Other things being equal, the biggest obstacle to my belief in intelligent extraterrestrial beings with a soul, even apart from the question of whether they could ever travel here or have any practical incentive to, is that a gigantic part of my theological core is my belief in Christ's dual nature, 100% human and 100% divine -- what theologians call the hypostatic union. The Son, the Second Person of the Trinity, voluntarily condescended to human form with all that entails (becoming a lowly human and suffering the indignities of human existence contrasted with enjoying perfect bliss in eternity past, being indescribably abused and mistreated, beaten, tortured, betrayed and murdered despite being sinless, and ultimately being separated from the Father -- all to allow fallen human beings a path to redemption and salvation. Christ became human and, I believe, remains human. While our omnipotent, Triune God can do anything not inconsistent with his nature, character, and purpose -- and these limitations are self-imposed, at that -- I suppose it's theoretically possible He could become incarnate in another form for other non-earthly intelligent beings. But I believe it would be contrary to the thrust of the Bible and to God's nature because He became man to die for our sins once and for all. I don't believe The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit would have chosen that path for man's redemption if there were another way to reconcile God's perfect justice with His perfect mercy and grace. So I think it's incredibly far-fetched that, after His earthly incarnation, Christ would do this all over again on another planet, galaxy, dimension or whatever. He certainly couldn't logically do it if He is still human, which I believe He is. I don't think He's going to do this all over again. Why don't people ever talk about this? I am abbreviating the reasoning here because I don't want to make this post too long but I trust you get the drift. Christ died, once and for all, for mankind's sins. Period.
- Apr 28, 2026483x their median
What's your favourite drummer of all time?
- May 27, 2026145x their median
In your opinion, what is the most important book ever written by mankind? ✍️
- May 3, 2026127x their median
In the 19th century physicist Simeon Poisson tried to argue that light was made of particles. He claimed that if light were a wave, it would bend around an object and create a bright spot right in the center of a shadow, which he considered obviously ridiculous. So he declared wave theory effectively dead. The problem was that his colleague Augustin-Jean Fresnel actually performed the experiment, observed exactly that bright spot, and proved Poisson completely wrong. Today, this phenomenon is known as the “Poisson spot.”
- May 2, 2026123x their median
Who do you think is the best Physics explainer of all time? ✍️
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Posts are seen about 242 times each, and 0.826% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.254% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 17461x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Aoleon Martian Girl's engagement rate on X?
- Aoleon Martian Girl (@aoleontmg) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 95,447 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, Aoleon Martian Girl sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @aoleontmg have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @aoleontmg post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.