Antonio Tabet engagement report
@antoniotabet - 2.8M followers on X
Measured over 380 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 9.6K interactions against 2.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.339%. Measured over 380 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 94K times each, and 10.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 22.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 380 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 291K interactions, about 30x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #tesouraçodoflávio, #frouxobolsonaro, #alttabet.
Measured over 380 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #tesouraçodoflávio, #frouxobolsonaro, #alttabet.
Compared with accounts its own size
Antonio Tabet's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.339%, Antonio Tabet sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 59% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 188 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 14, 202630x their median
https://t.co/BfBNtQyVvo
- Oct 16, 202623x their median
Só uma curiosidade: Eu fui proibido de ir no camarim do Lula durante a sabatina “pra não levantar dúvidas sobre a imparcialidade”.
- Dec 20, 201949x their median
Flávio Bolsonaro é chefe de organização criminosa que desviava dinheiro, aponta Ministério Público https://t.co/Z8ilgCqo92 #G1 https://t.co/xmdR5yigTR
- Oct 23, 202614x their median
No domingo iremos, pela terceira vez consecutiva, decidir entre o petismo e o bolsonarismo. A minha sensação como cidadão é de frustração e preocupação. Frustração pela nossa apatia em relação à política, em especial da nossa elite. Fomos incapazes de construir, nos últimos anos, uma alternativa decente e competitiva que nos tirasse dessa armadilha das últimas 3 eleições presidenciais. Vamos, mais uma vez, para um pleito a ser definido pela rejeição e não pela escolha. A discussão de propostas, de um plano para o País e o debate de ideias foram substituídos pelos ataques baixos e pessoais ao oponente. Fica evidente a incapacidade de ambos os lados de construírem uma nação próspera. O PT inaugurou o nós contra eles, dividindo os brasileiros, e o bolsonarismo, que nasceu já dentro dessa lógica, levou-a a um outro patamar. A urna, que deveria ser o momento para definirmos o futuro da nação, tornou-se, para muitos, um momento de expressão de raiva. Lula errou do início ao fim do seu mandato. Não promoveu o diálogo com quem pensa diferente, indicou amigos para o STF, insistiu na polarização, cercou-se de um núcleo duro despreparado, foi irresponsável com as contas públicas e adotou medidas eleitoreiras de mais gasto público. E, depois de todas essas ações, com baixa aprovação e com as limitações da idade, cometeu o maior erro: resolveu ser candidato pela 4ª vez. Flávio, por sua vez, não tem absolutamente nada que o credencie a governar o País. Falta postura, credibilidade e competência. Foi um senador sem qualquer iniciativa produtiva na área econômica, na segurança ou na educação. É conhecido apenas pelo sobrenome e pelo envolvimento em inúmeros casos suspeitos: rachadinha, lavagem de dinheiro, proximidade com membros da milícia e com golpistas. Está cercado de conhecidos oportunistas e seu objetivo maior é conceder o indulto ao pai, condenado por tentativa de golpe. O quadro político definido após o primeiro turno torna o meu sentimento de preocupação ainda maior do que o de frustração. Lula, se eleito, fará seu último mandato, sem nenhum sucessor definido, tem um vice-presidente com comprovada experiência na gestão pública e, apesar de ter a oportunidade de indicar membros do STF, encontrará forte oposição no Senado. Flávio, diferentemente, poderá se candidatar à reeleição, tem um vice-presidente desconhecido, terá uma Câmara e um Senado extremamente favoráveis e aliados comandando os principais estados brasileiros. São alternativas totalmente distintas para quem anseia por renovação em 2030 e teme a perpetuação de uma família no poder. Em 2018 e 2022, declarei o meu voto no segundo turno. Não foram decisões fáceis e sem ônus pessoais, pelo contrário. Nesse ano será ainda mais difícil. Entretanto, não expressar o que penso seria aceitar a ideia de que vivemos em um país onde as pessoas não são livres para emitirem a sua opinião pelo receio de serem agredidas. Não é essa nação que desejo. Serei oposição a qualquer um dos dois que vier a ser eleito, mas, entre a irritação com um novo governo Lula e o risco que representa um governo Bolsonaro, fico com a primeira opção.
- Sep 25, 202612x their median
Venho a público pedir desculpas à família miliciana. Em nenhum momento, afirmei que a família miliciana era a família miliciana. Quando citei a família miliciana, referia-me à família miliciana e não à família miliciana. Portanto, mais uma vez, perdão, família miliciana.
- Sep 27, 202611x their median
A família miliciana odeia tanto mulher preta, que resolveu atacar Nossa Senhora Aparecida! https://t.co/aiL4I3tLDH
- Jul 30, 202064x their median
ter uma namorada evangélica foi a melhor coisa que já aconteceu comigo. eu traí ela, ela descobriu, oramos juntos e culpamos o diabo. ôh glória!!
- Oct 6, 20269.5x their median
Não faz nem 48 horas que ganharam o 1º turno com a menor diferença de votos desde a redemocratização (só 1,87%) e já falaram em manter a escala 6 por 1, acabar com shows em Copacabana, esvaziar o Carnaval, mudar a Constituição e Pablo Marçal no STF. Parabéns aos envolvidos. 👍🏻
- Oct 23, 20269.1x their median
O Atila acabou de enterrar o Flávio! https://t.co/lnzCDf0Bk5
- Oct 21, 20269.0x their median
One month ago, I sat down with President Lula to discuss how government serving poor and working people. Weeks later, Brazil took a historic step: a 40-hour workweek, at least two days off and no cuts to pay for more than 30 million workers. Workers fought for decades to win the five-day workweek in America. Brazilian workers have fought for this victory, too. I congratulate them on this achievement. Working people deserve time to live, not just work. Building a better future means giving people more of their lives back. And we’ll keep fighting for it.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 9.6K interactions against 2.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.339%. Measured over 380 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 94K times each, and 10.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 22.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 380 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 291K interactions, about 30x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #tesouraçodoflávio, #frouxobolsonaro, #alttabet.
- What is Antonio Tabet's engagement rate on X?
- Antonio Tabet (@antoniotabet) has an engagement rate of 0.339%, based on the median interactions across 380 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,818,945 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.339%, Antonio Tabet sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @antoniotabet have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @antoniotabet post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 22.57 posts per day across the measured window.