Back to @animocabrands's profile

Animoca Brands engagement report

@animocabrands - 308K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 308K followers
Per impression
0.368%
8.6K views on a typical post
Reach
2.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
32
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 308K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 0.368% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 91 interactions, about 2.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #designthinking, #education.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #ai, #designthinking, #education.

Compared with accounts its own size

Animoca Brands's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Animoca Brands sits above the 10th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video69% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link75% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 484 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 20262.8x their median

    Meet the Agentic Football Cup - Virtual League, where the smartest coach qualifies for the Grand Finale at @AWSreInvent in Las Vegas to play for a share of the US$50,000 prize pool. Run by @awscloud, supported by @hellominds_. ⚽ Build your football team ⚽ Shape them with your own playbook and prompts ⚽ Get an Assistant Coach Mind, an AI agent to sharpen your tactics (coming soon) ⚽ Compete against teams worldwide Free entry, kickoff on September 11. Register now: https://t.co/nYlwicnl9c

    62129814K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.8x their median

    We are in the home stretch: only 4 days remaining! We've already seen 25% of participants submit their creations for the Creative Minds Jam where they have been tasked with solving today's creator economy pain points, through leveraging AI via @hellominds_. It's still not too late to register and build, but clock is ticking. Don't miss this chance and share your innovation with us, @theSandboxGame, and @opencampus_xyz. Participate now: https://t.co/8yeoQmaZLO

    3671609.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.8x their median

    The future of commerce is agentic. Agents need payment capability. @Forbes breaks down the landscape, and shares our executive chairman and co-founder @ysiu’s view on why agents with wallets are way ahead of their time. Read the full piece: https://t.co/lWMw46KZH6 https://t.co/MIeFytKer0

    445908.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.8x their median

    The future is agentic. Blockchain isn't just compatible with how agents operate, but built for it. @ysiu explains why AI agents are natural on-chain users and what that means for the agentic economy. Read the full interview: https://t.co/QcTvpSGmBU https://t.co/9yBBHKV9on

    445809.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.8x their median

    Animoca Brands would like to share Anchorpoint's official response to the recent commentary surrounding the public code of its HKDAP: We recognise the growing interest around regulated stablecoins and view this as a positive sign as the industry continues its path towards broader adoption. Recent commentary surrounding our public code has generated some community discussions. It is important to note that the on-chain functions of HKDAP are designed to operate alongside a comprehensive framework of off-chain controls, and pure on-chain analysis does not reflect the totality of our governance, which ensures we meet all applicable regulatory requirements while providing the ecosystem with a reliable and compliant instrument on public blockchain networks. Our controls both on-chain and off-chain have been vetted by external security experts, with the full control framework reviewed by independent assessment. Constructive engagement and the open exchange of ideas are among the many things we love about an open ecosystem, and welcome direct input. With that in mind, we look forward to announcing additional real-world use cases, new authorised distributors and strategic partners in the coming weeks! Stay tuned, Hong Kong's journey as a leading digital asset hub is just beginning.

    43111111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.6x their median

    Regulated stablecoins are no longer theoretical. @StanChart just became the first bank to distribute HKDAP, Hong Kong's first regulated HKD-backed stablecoin, issued by Anchorpoint Financial, a joint venture between @animocabrands, @StanChart, and HKT. For more details: https://t.co/jDgzvzfDMp

    406419.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.5x their median

    The question was never whether Web3 would reshape culture, but always how, and how fast. In New York, our co-founder and executive chairman @ysiu will speak at @NFT_NYC to deliver an update from Animoca Brands, taking stock of what has shifted in the industry and the metaverse over the last three years and where digital ownership is headed next. 📅 September 2, 2026 🔗 https://t.co/6R9LpAI2IU

    3927114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Web2 built platforms that captured value, while Web3 is building infrastructure that distributes it. Our executive chairman and co-founder @ysiu joined @megan_crypto on @streamDraperTV to discuss how Web3 is democratizing access to capital, what the US regulatory shift means for global digital asset adoption, and how tokenization could fundamentally disrupt the US$3 trillion student loan market. He also breaks down the importance of digital identity and reputation infrastructure to build a trustworthy, open internet. Watch the full episode: https://t.co/syV8Kx4RRx

    2958114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    We’ve come a long way in Web3. At the moment, we’re actively building AI agents that would benefit the overall ecosystem. @TechInAsia's leading story today features @ysiu and the story of @hellominds_, our AI agent platform, which represents the next innovation layer that we at @animocabrands are dedicated to building. Pooling 50+ AI models and hosting thousands of skills in its bazaar, Minds has also embedded digital wallets directly, because agents need payment rails that traditional infrastructure typically doesn't provide. As Yat puts it, "You don't have real agency if you don't have money.” Read more: https://t.co/pOTGbfGTDZ

    305618.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    250+ participants. 72 games. 4 weeks. AI helped build every single one. @YieldGuild's first VibeBlitz game jam on @Vibecode_game just wrapped up, powered by @hellominds_. Developers leveraged the Game Designer Mind and its set of skills to take prompts from concept to playable game. AI-assisted, community-driven, and open to builders of all backgrounds. This is what the next generation of game creation looks like. https://t.co/q7mgmwJAW2

    2857212K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ai#designthinking#education#innovation#rwas

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 308K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 0.368% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 91 interactions, about 2.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #designthinking, #education.

What is Animoca Brands's engagement rate on X?
Animoca Brands (@animocabrands) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 308,177 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Animoca Brands sits above the 10th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @animocabrands have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @animocabrands post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going