PlayerSells
Back to @andrizek's profile

André Rizek engagement report

@andrizek - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.053%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
1.02%
92K views on a typical post
Reach
5.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
940
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 940 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.053%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 1,657 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 1.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 291K interactions, about 310x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #selecaosportv.

Compared with accounts its own size

André Rizek's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,657 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.053%, André Rizek sits above the 25th percentile of the 16,421 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.009% to 0.059%.

p100.001%
p250.009%
p50 (median)0.059%
p750.364%
p902.26%
p99246.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 16,421 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 245,986 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.009%
50th percentile0.059%
75th percentile0.364%
90th percentile2.26%
99th percentile246.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 88%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%23K
01:00 UTC+1%23K
02:00 UTC-3%23K
03:00 UTC-4%23K
04:00 UTC-5%19K
05:00 UTC-6%18K
06:00 UTC-6%21K
07:00 UTC-4%23K
08:00 UTC-5%27K
09:00 UTC-3%30K
10:00 UTC-3%32K
11:00 UTC-3%34K
12:00 UTC0%38K
13:00 UTC-1%43K
14:00 UTC-3%45K
15:00 UTC-1%46K
16:00 UTC-2%45K
17:00 UTC-2%42K
18:00 UTC0%39K
19:00 UTC-1%36K
20:00 UTC0%34K
21:00 UTC+1%30K
22:00 UTC0%26K
23:00 UTC-1%23K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 88%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%113K
Monday-4%145K
Tuesday-2%125K
Wednesday-2%103K
Thursday-1%101K
Friday-2%109K
Saturday+5%103K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video18% of posts+87%+83% to +93%9.2K
Outbound link0% of posts-46%-48% to -45%9.3K
Typical length-+13%+11% to +15%9.6K
  • 18% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 87% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 46% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 288 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 13% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 20, 2026310x their median

    Nico Williams es campeón del mundo. Y tras la premiación, va directo a la tribuna a entregarle la medalla a su madre. Ella, que en 1994 salió de Ghana y cruzó parte del Sahara para poder llegar a España en busca de nuevas oportunidades. Una campeona más. https://t.co/sfwt2vMVst

    260K28K1.2K9786.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 2026208x their median

    https://t.co/lddKEFoQq5

    168K24K1.2K1.5K6.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202662x their median

    Trump on Balogun: "I saw the play, and I'm a person that loves sports ... that wasn't a foul. That wasn't even an infraction ... this referee, who is a little bit suspect if you check his past. He made a call that nobody could believe ... he's our best player, or one of our best players. And he gave him a red card. I didn't know what that meant ... yes, I asked for a review by FIFA."

    40K5.1K5.7K7.6K25M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202637x their median

    CazeTV fez uma projeção da escalação do Brasil na Copa de 2030. https://t.co/i2OPzTRYsK

    24K4826.8K3.5K4.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 202637x their median

    Tostão em sua coluna na Folha: “Receio que no futuro, a história conte que havia um país do futebol que tinha um rei, Pelé, e um grande número de craques fenomenais que jogavam o futebol bonito, espetacular e eficiente. O mundo parava para ver o Brasil jogar. Porém, por conta da desorganização, ganância, incompetência, corrupção, dos otimistas prepotentes, da globalização e da evolução dos outros países, o futebol brasileiro tornou-se igual a tantos outros e abaixo das principais potências. É preciso reagir. O futuro não é destino, futuro é o que será construído.”

    30K3.5K236250985K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202635x their median

    Messi se levantando para abraçar Lamine Yamal. Tremenda cena. https://t.co/u0z8swv0uV

    31K1.0K8741687K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202621x their median

    🇫🇷 Análise de Mbappé sobre França 0x2 Espanha: “Chegar à final era um sonho para nós. Mas não fizemos a partida que queríamos. Quando você não faz o que precisa fazer em uma semifinal de Copa do Mundo, não vence.” “A Espanha manteve seu plano de jogo, o estilo ao qual são fiéis: uma equipe que gosta de controlar a bola e o ritmo. A ideia era pressioná-los no campo de ataque para impedir que aquele ritmo lento e enganoso se estabelecesse, mas não conseguimos. Houve muitos erros. Não conseguimos causar danos a eles.” “Deixamos que eles ditassem o ritmo da partida. Fabián Ruiz e Rodri tiveram muito tempo com a bola. Faltou comunicação na hora da pressão. Precisávamos marcar individualmente e forçá-los a correr atrás de nós, porque eles são um time que não gosta de correr sem a bola. E mesmo quando recuperávamos a posse, nossos passes e toques iniciais não estavam à altura de uma semifinal de Copa do Mundo. Quando se junta tudo isso, o resultado é a derrota.” 🗞️ @geglobo 📸 FFF/Seleção Francesa

    19K5322054781.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 202613x their median

    Ed Sheeran fez show fechado para os jogadores da Inglaterra na Copa do Mundo. https://t.co/27LWBnD2au

    9.1K2724972.8K6.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20269.9x their median

    Final da Copa América de 1999. Graças a Deus eu vi. Os mais jovens jamais saberão o que Rivaldo e Ronaldo jogaram com a camisa do Brasil. Aliás, Rivaldo é o maior “pouca mídia, muito futebol” da história da Seleção Brasileira. https://t.co/DmA8OysKpj

    8.6K47116642540K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20269.4x their median

    Uma pena que essa final tão espetacular de Copa tenha sido transformada por muitos em bem x mal, o que talvez impeça tanta gente de apenas curtir um enorme jogo de futebol. Quando acabar essa peleja, o Brasil só falará de eleição e nosso ar ficará irrespirável, com tantos amigos brigando e se odiando por causa de certo x errado. Por isso, se quiserem um conselho... Desfrutem dessas duas equipes magníficas! Torçam por quem vocês quiserem, sequem quem acharem pertinente. E guardem essas palavras. Será o nosso último domingo de paz em 2026. Vivam cada minuto dele. Se é um problema admirar a seleção argentina pela campanha dos caras aqui... imaginem o inferno e a patrulha que tomarão conta de nossas vidas a partir de amanhã! Um ótimo jogo a todos e muito obrigado pela companhia aqui 👊🏾.

    2.9K1615.1K551984K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#selecaosportv

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 940 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.053%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 1,657 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 1.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 291K interactions, about 310x its own typical post.

What is André Rizek's engagement rate on X?
André Rizek (@andrizek) has an engagement rate of 0.053%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,771,975 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.053%, André Rizek sits above the 25th percentile of the 16,421 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @andrizek have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,657 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @andrizek post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going