Andrew Bogut engagement report
@andrewbogut - 399K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 399K followers, an engagement rate of 0.258%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 2.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 173K interactions, about 168x its own typical post.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #auspol.
Compared with accounts its own size
Andrew Bogut's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.258%, Andrew Bogut sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 73% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 9% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 536 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jun 27, 2026168x their median
The fact that Sophie triggered almost an entire league with just a simple point of a finger is just crazy motion 😂😂😂😂😂 https://t.co/7paK3NxFLC
- Jun 30, 202612x their median
Free agent center Jock Landale intends to sign a one-year, $14 million deal to return to the Atlanta Hawks, sources tell ESPN. Landale had a strong finish after being traded to the Hawks, averaging 10.6 points and 5.7 rebounds last season, and his agents Sammy Wloszczowski and Mike Lelchitski of SIG Sports finalized the deal Tuesday.
- Sep 20, 202611x their median
BREAKING: Journalist bowls @AlboMP middle stump at the UN Press conference, and he was rattled. "Prime Minister, here in New York on Wednesday night, you will receive an award for being a global citizen. Don't you feel like a bit of a fraud accepting this award when, at home, you screwed up the response to the worst massacre since Port Arthur? In the polls, you are taking Labor to one point shy of Julia Gillard when you rolled her, and your net negative is worse than Scott Morrison's." auspol
- Aug 18, 20267.0x their median
If you live in Melbourne and your home is invaded at 2am, call @VictoriaPolice and tell them it was a pack of @AFL players and you will have a squadron there within minutes……
- Aug 26, 20263.8x their median
Mr @DHughesy , Comedian by trade, is shining more of a light on state and federal corruption than any journalist could ever dream of. Concerning that this IS the level of journalism in Australia. But hey the Richmond Tigers had a Mad Monday in which a journalist drove 1 hr to record a private function.
- Sep 26, 20262.3x their median
https://t.co/SpnHqqoZUm
- Sep 10, 20262.2x their median
Albanese wants you to believe he had no idea he was an honorary member of Marrickville Golf Club. That is bullshit. The club still had him on the books. He never declared it. He has declared honorary memberships at other golf clubs, including Royal Sydney. So the register works fine when he feels like using it. It just somehow missed the club in his own electorate, the one his government then handed $6.05 million.  This is the same man who publicly campaigned to save that course. The same local member who has spent years talking about that precinct. Now he is the innocent bystander who “doesn’t play golf,” “has no card,” and “hasn’t been in the clubhouse for years.” That is not a defence. That is a Prime Minister insulting your intelligence. Then comes the kicker. He has a long record of owning multi-million-dollar property on Beauchamp Street, including a house marketed as sitting across from and overlooking Marrickville Golf Club. He sold that particular house in 2021. He still owns a multi-million-dollar Marrickville property. Same suburb. Same street association. Same course. Same Prime Minister. Same $6 million.  And the grant itself was not some national golf-course lottery. It came from Labor’s “invitation-only” $560 million infrastructure program. You did not apply. They picked. Surprise surprise….Guess what… 73% of the money went to Labor seats and Labor-target seats. Reporting on the scheme is that Marrickville was the only golf club invited to seek funding under that program. Other clubs, including ones that actually wanted a shot, were not asked.  So the story Albanese is selling is this: 1. He didn’t know about the membership he failed to declare. 2. He just happens to have spent years tied to that club. 3. He just happens to have owned a multi-million house on the same street as the course. 4. His government just happens to have written that course a $6 million cheque from a closed list almost nobody else could get on. 5. And the ABC should “do better” for noticing. Labor crucified Bridget McKenzie over $36,000 and an undeclared honorary membership. They called it a rort and a resignation offence. Albanese’s version is more than 160 times the money, in his own seat, next to property he has owned, from a slush list his party designed, and he makes “no apologies.” If you still believe he “wasn’t aware,” you are the audience this routine was written for. Anthony Albanese you sir are a farking disgrace and have zero integrity.
- Aug 19, 20262.0x their median
Wouldn’t it be cool to see what the future actually might look like? https://t.co/uthWHa6dBT
- Sep 7, 20261.8x their median
Sometimes support comes from where you least expect it. That happened recently when Australian comedian Dave Hughes publicly backed Ryan and the Meuleman family, calling on Victoria Police to properly examine the Bike Boy Investigation & evidence in a post on X. Thanks, Hughesy! https://t.co/Syy23jfJYD
- Sep 9, 2026
>Give 26 year old activist Chanel Contos’ organisation $4 million in taxpayer money >Contos starts telling Australians social media is creating a generation of dangerous young men. >Friendly leftist activist accounts amplify it. >ABC et al discover the “manosphere” in 2026, and begin pumping out stories about the terrifying things Australians are seeing online. >Anika Wells (married to a lobbyist husband) starts warning about the exact same thing. >Contos gets invited to the National Press Club. >“The algorithms are dangerous. Government needs to regulate them.” >Government: Wow. What an extraordinary GRASSROOTS demand for government regulation. >Announce sweeping new social media laws days later. >Meanwhile Labor is getting annihilated on cost of living, housing, immigration and its primary vote. >Suddenly deciding what Australians are allowed to be shown becomes a national emergency. >??? >PROFIT
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 399K followers, an engagement rate of 0.258%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 2.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 173K interactions, about 168x its own typical post.
- What is Andrew Bogut's engagement rate on X?
- Andrew Bogut (@andrewbogut) has an engagement rate of 0.258%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 398,806 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.258%, Andrew Bogut sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @andrewbogut have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @andrewbogut post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.