Back to @andressilvaa's profile

Andres Silva Arancibia engagement report

@andressilvaa - 106K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.006%
of 106K followers
Per impression
1.16%
516 views on a typical post
Reach
0.49%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 106K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Posts are seen about 516 times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.486% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 207 interactions, about 35x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Andres Silva Arancibia sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 643 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 13, 202135x their median

    10 características claves del #conexumidor en #FlumarketingUy19 https://t.co/UvI4zp5bWh

    14841162View on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.8x their median

    ⏱️ ¿Cuánto tiempo de nuestra vida nos sacan los trámites del Estado? Una fila, un traslado, un documento que nos vuelven a pedir. Para alguien del interior, un trámite puede implicar kilómetros de viaje y hasta una jornada perdida. 🇺🇾 Uruguay tiene grandes avances en gobierno digital, telecomunicaciones y acceso a internet. Esa infraestructura debe permitirnos dar el próximo paso: reducir burocracia, acortar plazos y evitar trámites y traslados innecesarios. En un nuevo editorial de CEPP, Andrés Silva Arancibia (@andressilvaa) propone cambiar la métrica: pasar del “trámite digitalizado” a la “hora ciudadana recuperada”. 📊 No solo cuánto digitalizamos, sino cuánto tiempo, dinero y esfuerzo le devolvemos a la gente. 💬 “Devolver tiempo también es devolver libertad.” 🔗 https://t.co/XXXBSGBd3E

    7301621 viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 2026

    En esta columna para el Diario El Universo del Ecuador, planteo que la inteligencia artificial dejó de ser una advertencia futura para convertirse en una encrucijada presente ... https://t.co/UGmV1lBBgc https://t.co/C01S1hwfyt

    4010265 viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 2026

    CONFERENCIAS TOUR LATAM 2026 IA y Sector Inmobiliario Bogotá 🇨🇴 https://t.co/tuUD7Uk9YR https://t.co/qa1Al0RjWI

    2100257 viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 2026

    ENTREVISTA: La inteligencia artificial no predice el futuro: calcula escenarios posibles ... https://t.co/LLbDfmC56B https://t.co/r9lQ13Wjao

    1110144 viewsView on X
  • May 11, 2026

    En Transforma 2026 Cartagena, Colombia ... https://t.co/qYeWHXHk5X https://t.co/QE0YUpHtGM

    1200167 viewsView on X
  • Jan 8, 2026

    COMPETENCIAS CLAVE 2026 En un mundo con inteligencia artificial, computación cuántica y otras tecnologías digitales disruptivas, las competencias clave de todo profesional comienzan a concentrarse menos en “saber herramientas” y más en saber adaptarse con criterio y agilidad. De aquí surgen seis competencias clave ... https://t.co/jIghWF8PH8

    2100198 viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 2026

    PRENSA Un chileno desarrolló un método con IA para investigar mercados en 5 días (ya desembarcó en Uruguay, busca 10 clientes este año y proyecta expansión regional). Puedes leer la nota completa aquí : https://t.co/x0KAQeeu4y #InteligenciaArtificial #Infonegogocios #EstudiosDeMercado #Empresas #Uruguay

    2000405 viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 2026

    Congresso da Associação Latino-Americana da Indústria de Eventos (COCAL). 1 Julho | Beach Park 2 e 3 Julho | Centro de Eventos do Ceará Fortaleza – Ceará – Brasil🇧🇷 🎤Conferencia: Disrupción con Propósito: Inteligencia artificial al servicio de eventos que generan desarrollo. https://t.co/HnH8JBFrAR

    1100216 viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 2026

    https://t.co/LIIQ26kysN

    1100172 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 106K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Posts are seen about 516 times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.486% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 207 interactions, about 35x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Andres Silva Arancibia's engagement rate on X?
Andres Silva Arancibia (@andressilvaa) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 106,188 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Andres Silva Arancibia sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @andressilvaa have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @andressilvaa post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going