Back to @andreshalders's profile

André Shalders engagement report

@andreshalders - 61K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.98%
of 61K followers
Per impression
7.19%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
27.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.167%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 61K followers, an engagement rate of 1.98%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 7.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 26.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

André Shalders's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.98%, André Shalders sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 20263.5x their median

    Mensagens indicam proximidade entre Vorcaro e Motta: 'Queria estar mesmo era em Mônaco com você' https://t.co/Zw70ijCPE4

    3.0K694273142188K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20263.2x their median

    👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.co/7ie0EouRcM

    3.1K2654064489K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20261.7x their median

    Uma coisa que a galera do assédio jurídico contra jornalistas tem que aprender: cada vez que vocês nos processam, dezenas de ex-aliados e inimigos seus viram nossas fontes.

    1.9K1183461K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261.7x their median

    Na minha opinião, o que se sabe até agora sobre o caso Lulinha /Luchsinger já permite afirmar que o filho do presidente Lula se beneficiou de verbas oriundas de corrupção Entenda como e por quê: Ps. Vai ficar de ponta-cabeça sim pq meu braço cansou. Ignore https://t.co/Y49tvX6JnP

    1.6K342531519K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Em Roraima, os dois candidatos líderes na disputa pelo Senado foram pegos com dinheiro na Cueca Este é o seu país, sinto informar-te https://t.co/Jbu2W6HDQo

    1.2K267432114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Augusto Cury confirma que usou IA para escrever programa de governo apresentado ao TSE Ferramenta Pangram apontou 81% de conteúdo de IA no programa de governo https://t.co/rCtm2RXR2l

    1.2K183574368K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    Advogado Willer Tomaz alega ter torrado R$ 5 bilhões em BETS só em 2025 Valor é maior que o PIB nominal de 75% dos municípios brasileiros Willer Tomaz é apontado como "hub financeiro e patrimonial" da roubança no INSS Reportagem de @demetriovec https://t.co/qQBGy2jRGa

    714129361414K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Shop Now: https://t.co/V8NaW6qgSV A compact grooming setup is easier to keep in your routine. Use this electric shaver for head grooming and beard touch-ups, then rinse the washable cutter head and keep the main body dry between uses. https://t.co/nd6Fulq4fQ

    64387010783K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    a verdade é que, em briga de cachorros médios, acaba ganhando o cachorro que tem mais vontade de ganhar

    2185204.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Estou com a @milena_teixe no @InteligenciaLta para entrevistar AUGUSTO CURRY É agora! Vem! https://t.co/FD63x7Vq6R

    121426213K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 61K followers, an engagement rate of 1.98%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 7.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 26.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 3.5x its own typical post.

What is André Shalders's engagement rate on X?
André Shalders (@andreshalders) has an engagement rate of 1.98%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 61,298 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.98%, André Shalders sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @andreshalders have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @andreshalders post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going