Back to @andrefernm's profile

André Fernandes engagement report

@andrefernm - 584K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.708%
of 584K followers
Per impression
19.1%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
3.70%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.09%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4.1K interactions against 584K followers, an engagement rate of 0.708%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 19.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 4.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

André Fernandes's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.708%, André Fernandes sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.435% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,960 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,518 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 24, 20264.1x their median

    Boca de fumo em um órgão administrado pelo governo petista aqui no Ceará. Mais um absurdo no nosso estado. https://t.co/XpjlWYkdPY

    13K3.2K28359185K viewsView on X
  • Dec 6, 20253.1x their median

    Flávio Bolsonaro, nome escolhido por Jair Bolsonaro, que, por perseguição política, está preso sem ter cometido absolutamente nenhum crime, tem meu total apoio! É Bolsonaro 2026!

    11K1.7K52647134K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.0x their median

    Documentos falsos estão sendo usados para prender inocentes? A demogracinha do Brasil é outro nível. Soltem Filipe Martins! https://t.co/hbHaAt0QWF

    9.3K2.8K884830K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20262.7x their median

    Essa é a “democracia pujante” para o período eleitoral. https://t.co/ZfHAvCmkTl

    8.7K1.9K4323048K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.5x their median

    E sobre o pagamento de 129 milhões que foi amplamente citado, o que acontecerá? https://t.co/9vtvsYwJn7

    8.0K2.0K742847K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.9x their median

    Certeza que foi para defender a soberania do Brasil. https://t.co/9LUhcMPqC7

    6.1K1.7K653524K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20261.9x their median

    Você não pode reclamar dos altos gastos da Janja, senão ela vai falar que é misoginia. https://t.co/iqNlwgbzWC

    6.1K1.6K1724133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20261.8x their median

    Prometeram picanha e entregaram a destruição do Brasil. https://t.co/hCKAS7EmlL

    5.7K1.7K1304841K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20261.8x their median

    Parece que aluguei um triplex na cabeça do Lula. Não se preocupe que estamos só começando, o Nordeste será salvo do PT. https://t.co/jpNOfUkk1h

    6.0K1.2K931353K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20261.8x their median

    O Ceará não pode continuar refém do crime organizado. https://t.co/bzd43hRff1

    5.7K1.4K171635K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.1K interactions against 584K followers, an engagement rate of 0.708%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 19.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 4.1x its own typical post.

What is André Fernandes's engagement rate on X?
André Fernandes (@andrefernm) has an engagement rate of 0.708%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 583,889 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.708%, André Fernandes sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,960 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @andrefernm have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @andrefernm post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going