Back to @andreacaricato's profile

andreacaricato engagement report

@andreacaricato - 76K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.067%
of 76K followers
Per impression
3.38%
1.5K views on a typical post
Reach
1.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
51
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 51 interactions against 76K followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 3.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

andreacaricato's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 3 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.067%, andreacaricato sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video6% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 6% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 175 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 25, 202332x their median

    Aviso oficial La luna acaba de entrar en Escorpio El poder cambiando de manos Les dejé 2 tips para cada signo (2)

    1.5K852517459K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202610x their median

    Manguanguas versión 80s.. https://t.co/zn7k8jIP7S

    3678048259.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.5x their median

    Hola gente Muy Ocupada esta mañana Pero nunca es tarde para un tip, verdad? Se les saluda

    1213502.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.7x their median

    Hola gente adaptable, flexible, que fluye con lo que hay y hace lo mejor posible con lo que tiene El mundo se rinde a nosotros! Se les saluda!

    755511.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.6x their median

    Hay días en que no tienes fuerzas para grandes cosas y está bien. Un pajarito en tu ventana te alegra la vida sólo por volar y cantar. Para eso nació. Tu también tienes derecho a "ser" de vez en cuando. Y es suficiente. Ánimo!

    774011.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.5x their median

    Nunca Es tarde para un tip extra (o dos...) Aries ♈ unidos y solidarios Tauro ♉ asistidos y activos Geminis ♊ con intuición y certeza Cáncer ♋ dando pasos bonitos Leo♌ agiganta sus capacidades Virgo ♍ en tratos inusuales Tu tarot conmigo

    724101.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Jamás es tarde para un tip extra (o dos..) Libra♎ reubica tu esperanza Escorpio ♏ mezcla tus expectativas Sagitario ♐ suaviza tus exigencias Capricornio ♑ zarandea a tus socios Acuario ♒ contacta a tus clientes Piscis ♓ desarrolla tu experiencia Tarot Carta Astral

    675001.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    Que su Jumanji sea llevadero hoy

    511011.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    La luna está junto a Júpiter Casi nunca se los digo porque la luna pasa por cada posición planetaria en un mes o menos Pero una follower me reclama, y sí , la luna está junto a Júpiter Tip (l) Aries ♈ una idea probable LEO 🦁 un acercamiento fugaz Sagitario ♐ un plan bueno

    456003.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    La luna Mercurio y Venus cada uno al final del signo que ocupan Tip Virgo ♍ de lo muy comunicativo a la prudencia Libra ♎ de lo original a la adaptación Escorpio ♏ de lo productivo al relax Sagitario ♐ de lo aprendido a lo utilizado Tarot en consulta Carta Astral

    446012.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 51 interactions against 76K followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 3.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is andreacaricato's engagement rate on X?
andreacaricato (@andreacaricato) has an engagement rate of 0.067%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 75,955 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.067%, andreacaricato sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @andreacaricato have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @andreacaricato post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going