Anatolij Sharij engagement report
@anatoliisharii - 279K followers on X
Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 591 interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.212%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 3.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.
Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Anatolij Sharij's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.212%, Anatolij Sharij sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 80% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 945 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 28, 202619x their median
According to my initial information, the Russians struck a warehouse where the Patriot missiles that had only just been received were being stored. They hit it about an hour ago… https://t.co/JsE8jyZm6A
- Sep 1, 20269.1x their median
Zelensky said that they will now “block Russian airspace.” This is a direct threat to shoot down passenger planes flying in Russian airspace. But Europe will kiss Zelensky’s ass yet again, pretending that threatening air carriers is a perfectly normal fucking thing to do. Yeah, go on, fucking go for it. It’s already complete fucking lawlessness at sea, and now, for fuck’s sake, all we need is airliners getting shot down too. Fucking morons.
- Feb 18, 20258.1x their median
🔹My name is Anatolii Sharii – Ukrainian Journalist and Opposition Politician I am the most-watched Ukrainian journalist and an opposition politician whose party was the first to be banned by Volodymyr Zelenskyy. •3 million subscribers on YouTube •1.5 million subscribers on Telegram •Persecuted for my journalism: I am being prosecuted for treason over a YouTube video Political Persecution Against Me •2 treason charges fabricated against me •1 attempted extradition from Spain •1 political refugee status revoked by Lithuania I continue my fight against Zelenskyy’s regime, exposing censorship, corruption, and political repression in Ukraine✌🏻
- Sep 4, 20265.9x their median
Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense launched a drone into the office of the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, in the central building of the Security Service of Ukraine in the center of Kyiv. https://t.co/F4UGvcpsmt
- Sep 2, 20264.5x their median
In non-terrorist Kyiv, the clash between two security agencies continues: the non-terrorist HUR and the non-terrorist SBU. There are already non-terrorist casualties; there are dead and wounded. Shootouts are still continuing, and an entire district in the capital has been cordoned off. I don’t see a single word about this in the Western prostitute press.
- Sep 6, 20263.7x their median
On 1 August 2024, seven climate activists from the “Letzte Generation” (“Last Generation”) movement illegally entered the grounds of Leipzig/Halle Airport. They cut through the outer security fence in three separate places and entered the airport’s restricted area. Five of the activists managed to glue themselves to the taxiways, while two others were detained before they were able to do so. Thus, as early as 2024, there was a documented case in which unauthorized individuals managed to breach the secured perimeter at night and gain direct access to the airside area of Leipzig/Halle Airport. Against this background, particular attention should be paid to an account given to me by an airport employee concerning another incident — one involving a drone. His account differs significantly from the version presented in the media. According to him, everything happened at night during the loading of a cargo aircraft in the Vorfeld 2 area, where, among other things, DHL aircraft are serviced and Antonov aircraft are located. Airport employees had noticed drones in the vicinity of the airport before. Near the S8a road, which runs along the perimeter of the airport, there is an emergency gate and a location offering a good view of the runway. At night, aviation spotters occasionally stand there photographing aircraft taking off and landing. According to the source, drones had also been seen in this area on numerous occasions, although they normally did not approach people or aircraft at close range. This time, however, the situation was different. During the loading operation, a small drone began circling near the cargo aircraft and then hovered directly next to an employee. According to the source, none of those present saw where exactly it had come from. When the device came close enough, the employee lowered it to the ground and pinned it down with his hand, damaging its propellers. He then reported over the radio that the drone was on the ground. It is what happened next that the source considers extremely strange. According to him, within just a few minutes, police officers, bomb-disposal specialists, firefighters, television crews and bomb-disposal equipment, including a specialized robot, appeared at the scene. The employee says that the speed of their arrival has raised questions among airport staff. The airport is located approximately 20 kilometres from Leipzig, and it is not possible to simply drive up to the terminal and enter the restricted airfield area. To gain access, outsiders are required to pass through security checks and obtain the appropriate permit, including a temporary Tagesausweis. According to the source’s estimate, the process of obtaining authorization and passing through the checkpoint alone takes time. He therefore does not understand how a specialized team, a television crew and heavy equipment could have reached the airfield itself almost immediately after the radio report. The source particularly strongly disputes reports that the device allegedly carried explosives or a detonator. According to him, the employee who brought the drone down with his own hands did not see either a detonator or any explosive material attached to it. The source also claims that photographs subsequently published in the media showing the drone with explosive material next to it do not correspond to what airport employees initially saw at the scene. The reference to Czech-made Semtex also raised particular suspicions for him. According to the source, the drone itself was a small, inexpensive consumer device intended primarily for photography and video recording. He doubts that such a device could have carried any significant additional payload at all According to the source, after seeing the news reports, the employee who personally brought the drone down was outraged by the way the incident had been presented to the public, but is unable to speak openly because he fears losing his job ⤵️
- Aug 26, 20263.2x their median
So, who killed the clergy at the Sviatohirsk Lavra in Ukraine? Let me remind you: one of them was shot and had his face slashed with a knife, while several others were wounded. One of them was stabbed in the lung in such a way that he would die, with the expectation that he would bleed to death. According to a statement by a severely wounded monastery novice, the killers were equipped differently from ordinary Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers. It was some kind of special unit. Through some simple deduction, we understand that the monastery is located, among other things, within the area of responsibility of the Kraken special unit of the Main Directorate of Intelligence of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense. Kraken consists of precisely those individuals who, at the beginning of the war, tortured and killed prisoners of war and filmed it on video. At the time, it caused a worldwide scandal. But due to the sluggishness and ineptitude of the Russian authorities and the perpetually drunk Russian Foreign Ministry, the story was immediately overshadowed by Bucha. Kraken was formed from members of the National Corps. The National Corps was subordinate to Andriy Biletsky. He has now been appointed a general by Zelensky. They are neo-Nazi pagans. Well, basically, as far as I’m concerned, the case is solved. Judging by the fact that the official authorities are silent and the Western press is not covering this ritual murder at all, I now understand perfectly well who did it.
- Aug 23, 20262.5x their median
Boryspil near Kyiv was attacked with Iskander missiles, with a truck parking lot coming under fire. Initially, it was claimed that the missiles had struck civilian facilities. The trucks were said to have been used to deliver food. People were killed. The Kyiv regional State Emergency Service (SES) foolishly published photographs showing that launch systems for long-range UAVs had been concealed inside the trucks. The photos were later removed from all Ukrainian publications. Civilians were killed in the strike on the vehicle parking lot. They did not know what was inside the trucks…
- Sep 6, 20262.5x their median
We are at war. Hundreds of thousands are dying. I suffer with my people. Well, honestly. https://t.co/I1fUeHoQwC
- Aug 24, 20262.1x their median
After the mass killings of the Jewish population of Bila Tserkva in August 1941, around 90 Jewish children remained locked inside a building in horrific conditions. The children - from just a couple of months old to seven years old - were kept in a locked house without food or water. The little ones cried constantly and begged to be allowed to go to their mothers and fathers, while their mothers and fathers were already lying in pits. Even the Germans were affected by this. Soldiers of the 295th Infantry Division approached the chaplains and asked them to help resolve the issue. German military chaplains Ernst Tewes and Gerhard Wilczek tried to prevent what was inevitably going to happen. They were joined by Wehrmacht staff officer Helmuth Groscurth. Groscurth stated that this was completely unacceptable, that the children had to be released and certainly not killed. The intervention of the officer and the chaplains only managed to postpone the massacre temporarily. On August 21, the German command nevertheless authorized the killing of the children. Then the question arose: “Who?” The Wehrmacht commanders (incidentally, their names are clearly documented and were later mentioned at trial) flatly refused to give such an order to their subordinates. Their reasoning was that their soldiers were young men and that such a killing would diminish their combat effectiveness. The organization of the execution was entrusted to SS officer August Häfner. He, too, did not insist that the perpetrators be Germans. Because the perpetrators were already at hand: not only did they not object, they expressed their willingness to kill the children. They were Ukrainian auxiliary policemen. On August 22, 1941, the children were taken to a previously prepared grave and shot. The killing was also documented thanks to the testimony of Germans. The children could not always be killed with the first shot; they tried to run away and were finished off. Häfner later testified about the killing of the children and described what happened at the grave. Now comes the question: who made up the execution squad? Here the answer is clear. Historian Karel Berkhoff, cited in an academic publication by De Gruyter, writes that the Ukrainian police and the Bukovinian Kurin were created or commanded by activists of the Melnyk faction of the OUN (OUN-M). It further states that some of the arriving nationalists went to establish police units in Vasylkiv and Bila Tserkva. There is also a source on the history of the Jewish community of Bila Tserkva that puts it this way: “90 Jewish children were killed … by Ukrainian police (presumably they were members of OUN-M).” The fact is that, despite all the wishes of modern Ukrainian historians, they could not have been anyone other than Melnykites. Fact: Andriy Melnyk’s OUN-M was directly involved in the creation and recruitment of the Ukrainian auxiliary police in the occupied territories. Fact: the Ukrainian auxiliary police regularly participated in mass executions of Jewish civilians. The Ukrainian auxiliary police, formed from members of OUN-B and OUN-M, was the main (!) perpetrator of the Holocaust in the Ukrainian SSR; these police units participated in the extermination of 150,000 Jews in the Volhynia region alone. They also killed Polish civilians (primarily in Volhynia). Members of the Melnyk faction of the OUN were specifically sent to Bila Tserkva. Bringing back the corpse of this scumbag along with the corpse of his worthless wife, and bestowing honors and respect upon this child murderer, is an enormous disgrace not only for the country and its leadership, but also for the Jewish community, the chief rabbi, the hundreds of thousands of descendants of those who were executed, and the millions of still-sane people remaining in this country. And they are already getting ready to bring Bandera’s corpse back as well. Happy holiday, to anyone who still celebrates this insanity.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 591 interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.212%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 3.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.
- What is Anatolij Sharij's engagement rate on X?
- Anatolij Sharij (@anatoliisharii) has an engagement rate of 0.212%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 279,412 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.212%, Anatolij Sharij sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @anatoliisharii have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @anatoliisharii post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.