Back to @ananavarro's profile

Ana Navarro-Cárdenas engagement report

@ananavarro - 1.9M followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.066%
of 1.9M followers
Per impression
2.50%
50K views on a typical post
Reach
2.62%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 2.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bleepwithananavarro, #bleepwitjananavarro.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #bleepwithananavarro, #bleepwitjananavarro.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ana Navarro-Cárdenas's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.066%, Ana Navarro-Cárdenas sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202620x their median

    This is the full letter Natalie Harp sent to Donald Trump. This is some freaky stuff. Anyone with a brain can see that https://t.co/1wJl6GWJzM

    19K3.2K1.7K5143.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202613x their median

    Ana Navarro: “The ballroom, that was supposed to be privately paid, it’s not. The pool, it’s over budget and now it has to be repaired again, that’s coming out of your pocket. The replacing of the grass of the ellipse and this heliport he wants to build, that’s coming out of your pockets. The repaving of the Rose Garden, that’s coming out of your pocket. A lot of the expenses related to this disastrous flop of a state fair, that’s coming out of your pocket at a time when Americans can’t afford basic needs. When Americans don’t have money for healthcare, for groceries, for summer vacations, to pay for medicine or fill their tank with gas. This is what this guy is doing”

    11K3.9K62485206K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 202610x their median

    Ana Navarro: “While Trump is misspending money, there is no water in parts of Puerto Rico. There hasn’t been water there for weeks because there is an aging water system and electric grid that this president refuses to invest in and pay attention to. In the United States, we are letting Americans go with a shortage of water for weeks while he spends billions of dollars on his vanity projects”

    8.9K2.2K1.3K89270K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20269.9x their median

    Navarro: ….They killed Renee Good and Alex Pretti. And now Lorenzo Salgado Araujo Sunshine: Do you know some of the names of Americans who've been killed by illegal immigrants? What are some of the names? Navarro: What are the names of people that have been killed by U.S. Citizens? Sunshine: How is that relevant to this? Navarro: Well, you want to start talking about people who've been killed. Then let's start talking about people who've been killed in this country

    11K1.3K369471.2M viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 20267.1x their median

    Ana Navarro: “Trump is furious that the people he endorsed are losing. Getting the endorsement of Donald Trump in California is like being endorsed by Satan when a Cardinal wants to be elected Pope. People in California detest, loathe Donald Trump” https://t.co/IDVG5EkdiX

    7.5K1.2K17826193K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 20266.1x their median

    Navarro: His consistent berating and insulting attacks against women… Sunshine: Give me a break! Navarro: Why don’t you give me a break? Have you no shame as a woman? Have you no solidarity with women? Phillip: Why did the president tell a woman that she doesn't smile enough? Sunshine: Because he's an equal opportunity offender.

    6.4K88838765468K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20263.6x their median

    My heart is broken for this beautiful country of brave people. Please pray for Venezuela. https://t.co/GdIgfNBLgk

    4.0K45197857K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20263.4x their median

    Ana Navarro on Trump: “His ankles are like the size of tree trunks. His hands are completely bruised and there’s some mismatch makeup. He’s got some weird ass scab on the side of his neck where probably an IV tube goes in. And he falls asleep everywhere” https://t.co/vQTsZUcdra

    3.5K636434127K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20263.2x their median

    Ana Navarro: “Everything Donald Trump touches turns to shit. In addition to being the worst president in US history, he is also the worst luck charm in America. When he attended Game 5 of the World Series in [2019], the Nationals lost. When he attended the Commanders game in November of 2025, the Commanders lost by 22 points. When he attended Game 3 of the NBA Finals, the Knicks lost. When he got involved in the World Cup, the US team lost”

    3.2K72610314101K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20263.0x their median

    What a non-sensical prime time address or whatever that was. The rantings of a mad-man. Dude must have consumed contaminated lettuce. But it affected the wrong orifice. He has explosive diarrhea of the mouth. https://t.co/EjtM0Uja9l

    2.9K5463121749K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bleepwithananavarro#bleepwitjananavarro

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 2.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bleepwithananavarro, #bleepwitjananavarro.

What is Ana Navarro-Cárdenas's engagement rate on X?
Ana Navarro-Cárdenas (@ananavarro) has an engagement rate of 0.066%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,909,992 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.066%, Ana Navarro-Cárdenas sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ananavarro have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ananavarro post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going