Back to @analizador2000's profile

Analizador engagement report

@analizador2000 - 187K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.424%
of 187K followers
Per impression
2.57%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
16.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
762
interactions (median)
Saved
1.14%
340 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 762 interactions against 187K followers, an engagement rate of 0.424%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 2.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Analizador's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.424%, Analizador sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video95% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 65 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 25, 202615x their median

    Cuzinho devidamente destruído. Depois de uma cravada dessas leva um tempo pro cu voltar ao normal. No final ela chupa o pau que estava no rabinho dela pra sentir o gosto do cu na pica do macho https://t.co/JZBQVNPTp7

    11K609297247K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202612x their median

    Meia hora dessa princesa sendo enrabada em tudo que é posição https://t.co/hd88v1S9Tr

    8.1K66252132K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202611x their median

    A loira lindíssima, louca pra ter o seu cuzinho alargado, nos deixou com uma das cenas de anal Amador mais perfeitas. 10/10 https://t.co/xOVimNA3iH

    8.1K38880166K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202611x their median

    Pica grossa sendo deliciosamente engolida pelo cuzinho https://t.co/eh9CVb0nNc

    7.4K682127168K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20268.8x their median

    Bundinha perfeita sendo arrombada https://t.co/Kei3AWoqiv

    6.2K49432126K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20268.2x their median

    Perninha pro alto e muito lubrificante até colocar tudo dentro https://t.co/oARnWvetS2

    5.9K3658592K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20266.6x their median

    Chupou o pau e deu o cuzinho bem gostoso. Deixou a buceta de folga https://t.co/tNZbTafF3Q

    4.7K31690132K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20266.4x their median

    Arregaçou o cuzinho e depois encheu a boca dela de leite https://t.co/C4EK04urDR

    4.4K42910494K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20265.6x their median

    Gatinha tatuada sentou com o cuzinho. Coisa linda https://t.co/TOv1hCH5yD

    4.0K2564189K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20265.5x their median

    Começou devagar, a cada estocada colocando um pouco mais. E ela gemendo baixinho. No final estava socando forte tudo dentro, o gemido virou grito e o leite jorrou todo dentro da bunda dela https://t.co/INeljGNdHE

    3.8K3241598K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 762 interactions against 187K followers, an engagement rate of 0.424%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 2.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is Analizador's engagement rate on X?
Analizador (@analizador2000) has an engagement rate of 0.424%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 186,727 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.424%, Analizador sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @analizador2000 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @analizador2000 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going