Back to @anadeaustria_'s profile

๐—”๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ engagement report

@anadeaustria_ - 227K followers on X

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.03%
of 227K followers
Per impression
0.878%
7.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
68
interactions (median)
Saved
0.051%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 68 interactions against 227K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 0.878% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 572x its own typical post.

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐—”๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.03%, ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,055 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 147 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 2026572x their median

    Sintiรณ que un dron lo estaba espiando, pero con lo que no contaba el dron es con que รฉl tenรญa material antiaรฉreo de รบltima generaciรณn.๐Ÿ˜ฒ ๐Ÿ˜‡https://t.co/xHCDcO3s0Y

    36K2.2K3081627.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026132x their median

    Esto es posiblemente una de las peores cosas que te pueden pasar cuando estรกs trabajando, espero sinceramente que estรฉ bien.๐Ÿ˜Ÿ๐Ÿ˜ข๐Ÿ˜ฑ https://t.co/01CWXtGK6I

    8.6K30013041.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202635x their median

    Imaginad que estรกis a solas limpiando en una sala de hospital y que, de pronto, suceda algo asรญ.๐Ÿ˜ฑ https://t.co/LUw39qpuuc

    2.2K146181845K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202614x their median

    Si un hotel de lujo te aconseja una cosa asรญ, no te digo que dudes del truco, pero desde luego deberรญas dudar del lujo.๐Ÿ˜Ÿ๐Ÿ˜ฅ https://t.co/jFAKPeroCA

    87922340301K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20268.8x their median

    Este mirador de Bangkok no es para todo el mundo. ยฟOs subirรญais o se os sale el corazรณn antes de llegar al final?๐Ÿ˜ฑ https://t.co/HJ8spZMr6U

    50961216301K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20268.3x their median

    Ese momento exacto en el que te das cuenta de que se hubiera llegado antes por el camino largo.๐Ÿ˜Ÿ๐Ÿ˜ฅ๐Ÿ˜‡ https://t.co/zAjwLxoWyN

    547191064K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20266.3x their median

    Un niรฑo se cayรณ a un pozo y, sin pensรกrselo dos veces, alguien se lanzรณ para intentar salvarlo, y esto fue lo que pasรณ.๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ˜ข https://t.co/8qxycx7S0z

    413141057K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20265.8x their median

    Pillรณ a su compaรฑero durmiendo durante el trabajo y esto fue lo que hizo, ยฟhabrรญais hecho lo mismo o algo parecido o pensรกis que no debiรณ actuar de esa manera?๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ˜Ÿhttps://t.co/FIqMgtxIx6

    383111067K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.8x their median

    Imaginad ir a un hotel y enteraros de que habรญa esto metido dentro de un cuadro...๐Ÿ˜Ÿ https://t.co/BLUO1POS4S

    247130045K viewsView on X
  • Apr 23, 20263.2x their median

    Una odisea perruna.๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ’ƒ๐Ÿ˜‡ https://t.co/c4r3vaUmPj

    1971931132K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 68 interactions against 227K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 0.878% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 572x its own typical post.

What is ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ's engagement rate on X?
๐—”๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ (@anadeaustria_) has an engagement rate of 0.03%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 227,090 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.03%, ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @anadeaustria_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @anadeaustria_ post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going