Back to @altura's profile

Altura engagement report

@altura - 144K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.038%
of 144K followers
Per impression
1.21%
4.6K views on a typical post
Reach
3.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
56
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 144K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 45% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 91 interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Altura's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.038%, Altura sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video91% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 216 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 20261.6x their median

    Somewhere between a game, a market, and a nature documentary. That's Planet Altura. Coming soon. https://t.co/vMcgId68Gd

    7113614.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 2026

    🎙️ AI Agents On-Chain: Real Economic Shift or Peak Narrative? Every cycle has one narrative that turns out to be real, and few others that quietly disappear. Agents are the loudest one on the board right now. Join our Co-founder Dylan Dewdney @dylandewdney and ChainGPT Head of BD Vlad Nazar @vladnazar_xyz as they break down whether on-chain AI agents are the real economic unlock… or just peak narrative. 🗓️ 28 July 2026 ⏰ 2 PM UTC Set your reminder 👉 https://t.co/JBGrVnTmlv

    5410805.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    CT is still talking about the last meta. $ALU holders are already positioned for Agentic Gaming. And are one signup away from being early to Agentic Finance at the same time. At no cost. Powered by @kuvilabs. https://t.co/kok4PdK6QQ

    635115.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    A detail most people miss: every $ALU purchase runs on its own multiplier clock. Buy again next month and that tranche starts fresh at 0.1× while your older position keeps climbing toward 10×. Nothing resets. It only stacks. ⬆️ https://t.co/8209gmhoL4

    633305.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    The interesting thing about agents in games isn't that they talk. It's that they want things, and will trade, refuse, and hold out for a better offer to get them. Dialogue is a feature. Motivation is an economy. https://t.co/PIYzkp0KjL

    557504.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 2026

    Sports have seasons. Shows have episodes. Planet Altura has rounds. Same appointment. New stakes. https://t.co/OMIETQPsBh

    5674096K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Some of you had a tamagotchi. This is that. Except it has: - capital - a society - its own will and unique personality - a life plan you didn't write - no need of your presence It won't die of your absence. It'll just keep going. possibly better. A tamagotchi had "needs". Your agent has "wants".

    578104.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    1/ You keep hearing about AI agents in games & Agentic Gaming. Here's what it looks like in practice. https://t.co/QK36Gvisx1

    584216.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    Two reasons to hold base:0x91ad1b44913cd1b8241a4ff1e2eaa198da6bf4c9. First: being early to Agentic Gaming. NPCs that think, economies that emerge. The other is that the holding itself earns kuvi:native, more of it the longer you hold. One position, both frontiers. https://t.co/IBrcP7WaCZ

    593205.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    "Open World" has meant a big map for fifteen years. It could mean the world keeps going without you. https://t.co/QpEONRvg0G

    557105.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 144K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 45% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 91 interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post.

What is Altura's engagement rate on X?
Altura (@altura) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 144,004 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.038%, Altura sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @altura have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @altura post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going