Back to @alpharivelino's profile

Rivelino engagement report

@alpharivelino - 278K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.498%
of 278K followers
Per impression
3.52%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
14.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.737%
289 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 278K followers, an engagement rate of 0.498%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 3.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rivelino's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.498%, Rivelino sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.5%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video11% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 11% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 124 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 22, 202314x their median

    THE WISDOM OF RIVELINO 1-She is like a child 2-Don't lean in to her. Pull her into you 3-Men have to create their value. Women have to protect their value 4-Remember to facefuck her 5-Arguing with her is falling into her frame

    16K2.7K3693097.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20269.4x their median

    The sooner you give her a nickname, the sooner you can fuck her

    13K304229263K viewsView on X
  • May 9, 20235.5x their median

    I think one of the reasons I got divorced is that I blamed my wife for things and that led to massive fights With my new girlfriend, I don't blame her for *anything*. I take full responsibility when anything goes wrong between us and that helps calm her down

    6.4K6502742433.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.7x their median

    If you want to understand women, start with this mantra: She is like a child

    2.2K9314478K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    The first time you call her out on bad behavior, you should be playful

    1.7K5212346K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    Good women are out there, but they’re only 20-30% of women, and they AVOID low value men So the more “confidently” you hear a man state that all women are sluts, the more you know he falls into that low value category. The good women avoid him Sewers are full of rats

    1.5K8922757K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    ASK RIVELINO “You should be able to fuck her on the first or second night. If not, she's not into you.” 1000% wrong. If you only filter for girls that will fuck you quickly, you will end up a bitter man with herpes on his dick Higher quality girls are out there. They require more time, patience and trust. And they look for men of higher value, men with ambition, high achievements, unique skills If you find yourself surrounded by sluts, you’re the problem

    1.3K5033339K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    To reject feminism, embrace the she is like a child philosophy

    1.1K529114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    White pussy is one hell of a drug https://t.co/8moIUzmBDp

    8722217118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    She is like a child

    30417507.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 278K followers, an engagement rate of 0.498%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 3.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Rivelino's engagement rate on X?
Rivelino (@alpharivelino) has an engagement rate of 0.498%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 277,749 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.498%, Rivelino sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @alpharivelino have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @alpharivelino post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going