Back to @alphafox's profile

AlphaFox engagement report

@alphafox - 877K followers on X

Measured over 118 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.03%
of 877K followers
Per impression
1.09%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
2.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
266
interactions (median)
Saved
0.066%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.57/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 266 interactions against 877K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 118 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 118 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 121x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #newmusic, #noupgrade.

Measured over 118 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #newmusic, #noupgrade.

Compared with accounts its own size

AlphaFox's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.03%, AlphaFox sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,881 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 2026121x their median

    🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Drake's goth girl, Pinkchyu, gave an interesting answer about her relationship with the rapper when asked where they stand today. https://t.co/U2sqB8y0D8

    30K7811.0K5779.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202681x their median

    https://t.co/6q3XeHTRlq

    19K2.5K2701731.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202672x their median

    Happy birthday to Skynet, which became self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern Time on August 29, 1997! https://t.co/emtrstTU7a

    15K3.9K191246429K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202649x their median

    At Oktoberfest in Germany, no women wear hijabs or burqas, and the atmosphere is very serene. https://t.co/vE69Lt5kwS

    12K98323657378K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202640x their median

    Does a girl really deserve this? :( https://t.co/Dp9064qLrr

    9.6K250749442.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202639x their median

    Here’s why the Durupinar Formation is the most compelling location of Noah’s Ark: 1) Virtually the EXACT same length 2) 26 Drogue (boat anchor) stones found in vicinity 3) Located in the EXACT place described in the Bible 📍WHY Archaeologists are SO against it: 1) It would validate the Bible 2) Confirmation of the Great Flood and/or Noah’s Ark would require Textbooks to be completely rewritten 3) Countless archaeologists, historians, professors, and so-called “experts” will permanently lose all credibility They desperately want this to be debunked. The most comprehensive Scientific testing of this site is at last underway, the results haven’t even been published. YET, the naysayers are prematurely rallying against it, frantically hoping for it to be simply a natural geological formation. The distinction between the truly opened-minds VS the closed-minds has never been more clear.

    9.0K1.0K42780630K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202638x their median

    https://t.co/JYT5oPX7TZ

    9.8K2921914234K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202637x their median

    There be only one way for make America great again. Take away vote from white woman. Asian woman can vote because our math and IQ very high and we do not kill childrens.

    8.9K47748561206K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202637x their median

    Non-binary singer Sam Smith’s new album becomes massive flop after failing to chart on the Billboard 200. The singer, who uses They/Them pronouns, sold just 6,500 units in the first week of his new albums release in the U.S. https://t.co/dquzAuZTQU

    6.6K4602.4K4119.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202632x their median

    Exhibit A on why buffets are shutting their doors in mass: https://t.co/9fnSHdK5Tq

    6.3K1.1K9001432.7M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#newmusic#noupgrade

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 266 interactions against 877K followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 118 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 118 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 121x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #newmusic, #noupgrade.

What is AlphaFox's engagement rate on X?
AlphaFox (@alphafox) has an engagement rate of 0.03%, based on the median interactions across 118 original posts from the last 30 days against 876,580 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.03%, AlphaFox sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @alphafox have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @alphafox post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going