Back to @alifarhat79's profile

Not Jerome Powell engagement report

@alifarhat79 - 2.0M followers on X

Measured over 153 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.035%
of 2.0M followers
Per impression
1.11%
61K views on a typical post
Reach
3.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
680
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
9.27/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 680 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 153 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 61K times each, and 1.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 153 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 57K interactions, about 84x its own typical post.

Measured over 153 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Not Jerome Powell's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, Not Jerome Powell sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 202684x their median

    Grok in 2039 looking for the guy who made it count to 1 billion https://t.co/x8Ylf0Dl4d

    55K2.3K15353625K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202652x their median

    🎯 https://t.co/vWVTI5LwLr

    32K3.4K13789468K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202647x their median

    He used all his telepathic powers that day: https://t.co/KOy3jRiA9b

    31K1.0K311771.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202620x their median

    https://t.co/OLQWxpJSXq

    13K6146430210K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202618x their median

    https://t.co/pYMT09jvUV

    11K6375823154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202614x their median

    BREAKING: The Fed introduces new $1 bill. https://t.co/D6HfBWZXwd

    8.8K76815561148K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202613x their median

    Scott Bessent trying to calm the Treasury market https://t.co/cRuTWh48QF

    7.9K92611178270K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202612x their median

    Me realizing I won’t be the Fed chair when the big crash happens https://t.co/qOAqpj3SkV

    7.9K4076927221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202612x their median

    Every time https://t.co/MVs6EDQTtV

    7.3K5421212696K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202610x their median

    Lmao https://t.co/kSGMxWVryY

    6.5K265198130K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 680 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 153 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 61K times each, and 1.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 153 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 57K interactions, about 84x its own typical post.

What is Not Jerome Powell's engagement rate on X?
Not Jerome Powell (@alifarhat79) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 153 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,974,627 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, Not Jerome Powell sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @alifarhat79 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @alifarhat79 post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 9.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going