Back to @alferdez's profile

Alberto Fernández engagement report

@alferdez - 2.2M followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.072%
of 2.2M followers
Per impression
1.60%
99K views on a typical post
Reach
4.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.031%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.83/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 2.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.072%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 99K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #escandalo, #lavozenvivo, #pautaoficial.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #escandalo, #lavozenvivo, #pautaoficial.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alberto Fernández's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.072%, Alberto Fernández sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 17, 202619x their median

    La foto de la campaña ❤️ https://t.co/KhQYB7Rtco

    22K3.5K3.0K1.3K2.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20269.1x their median

    Un pueblo sin sol y con un presidente desquiciado, ni Stephen King imaginó esta trama.

    12K2.0K14520122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20268.2x their median

    "Todo esto de cuidar la tierra, del ambientalismo idiota, dicen que los seres humanos estamos rompiendo el planeta... ¿para que está el planeta entonces si no es para que lo rompamos? ¿para que se creó si no es para romperlo?". El perturbado de Milei aseguró que el planeta se creó para ser destruido y saqueado por los capitalistas, si Argentina sobrevive a este subser será un milagro.

    8.1K3.9K510356222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.5x their median

    “SIN INTERNET” Porque La Derecha Diario se habría quedado sin internet y no pudo informar sobre la detención de su socio Fernando Cerimedo por intento de femicidio. https://t.co/d1L4g1U2MT

    9.8K2.1K503585K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20265.9x their median

    Alberto Fernández: “Que los ingleses no se preocupen por las Malvinas, Argentina quedó absolutamente desarmada”. Qué canalla tenés que ser para decir estas cosas. https://t.co/Y2Op9ChzHT

    7.9K1.2K02301.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.6x their median

    Así como la oyen hablar, es la secretaria general de la Presidencia: no puede hilvanar una frase, confunde verbos, inventa tiempos y convierte "habramos" y "pudiéramos poder" en doctrina oficial. Que el país esté al mando de esta bestia bruta —a quien nadie votó— no es para preocuparse: es para meterse un corchazo.

    5.0K1.8K370130163K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20264.2x their median

    Milei me recomendó comparar sus resultados. Mirá lo que veo cuando lo hago…en 2023, 1 de cada 35 familias en mora. Hoy son 1 de cada 8 familias las que no pueden pagar sus deudas. El peor número en 20 años. Datos del Banco Central 🙄 https://t.co/oBYQjIpndL

    3.5K8142.1K128352K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20264.1x their median

    Hay algo que ni el COVID-19 pudo hacer. Milei lo hizo. https://t.co/QRqI4NKqat

    4.2K6881.5K88366K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.1x their median

    Así promocionaba Horacio Cabak la "academia" de Cerimedo https://t.co/V0hpTnmtSC

    4.6K1.6K161149508K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.3x their median

    ¿Alguien conoce a los hijos de Caputo para que convenzan a su padre que traiga a la Argentina los dólares que tiene fuera del país en bancos y empresas off shore? 🙄🤦🏻‍♂️ https://t.co/4ACVYTrRyu

    3.7K70185175108K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#escandalo#lavozenvivo#pautaoficial#política

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 2.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.072%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 99K times each, and 1.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #escandalo, #lavozenvivo, #pautaoficial.

What is Alberto Fernández's engagement rate on X?
Alberto Fernández (@alferdez) has an engagement rate of 0.072%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,181,114 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.072%, Alberto Fernández sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @alferdez have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @alferdez post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going