Back to @alexandreruiz's profile

๐—”๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜‡ engagement report

@alexandreruiz - 593K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 593K followers
Per impression
0.527%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
2.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
70
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 593K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.527% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 62x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ruizclub, #football, #mercato.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026. Recurring tags: #ruizclub, #football, #mercato.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐—”๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜‡'s engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, ๐—”๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜‡ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video76% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 278 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 12, 202662x their median

    Ok Madrid a gagnรฉ. Ok Mbappรฉ va une nouvelle fois marquer des dizaines de buts. Mais ce Real Madrid ne montre aucune รฉvolution depuis le dรฉbut de saison. Oรน est cette qualitรฉ technique de l'รฉpoque Zidane, Figo, Beckham (...) ou de l'รฉpoque Modric, Kroos ? Une รฉquipe coupรฉe en deux. Mourinho fait du Mourinho 2010-13. Comme avec Benzema, Bale, Cristiano, il prรฉfรจre voir son bloc redescendre pour uniquement espรฉrer un ballon volรฉ et bonifiรฉ par la vitesse et le cรดtรฉ tueur de Mbappe, Vini et Jude. Mais oรน est le JEU ?! Oรน est la gouvernance ? Oรน est le contrรดle ? L'รฉchec Rodri est d'autant plus retentissant aprรจs le match de ce soir car Gรผler aurait aimรฉ avoir ร  ses cรดtรฉs quelqu'un qui parle le mรชme langage que lui, qui parle football. Le Turc a รฉtรฉ le meilleur en entrant ร  la 72e. Il doit รชtre titulaire. Ce qui ne devrait pas faire les affaires de Diomandรฉ. Ce Real ne m'a pas plu. Mourinho doit rรฉagir. #RealMadridRayo 4โ€ข1

    3.6K45415890250K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202621x their median

    Courtois et Mbappรฉ font et tiennent ce Real Madrid. Point. #RealMadridInter

    1.2K1561073545K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202612x their median

    ๐Ÿ”ด ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐—–ฬง๐—” ๐— ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—–๐—”๐—ง๐—ข ๐Ÿ“ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐Ÿฒ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ #Football #Mercato #Barรงa #Barca #fcbarcelona #barcelona https://t.co/8SJXrpbd5Q

    752498420K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20268.1x their median

    ๐Ÿ”ด ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฎ ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฒ CIV-CAM 20H30 https://t.co/GfMSgrEr2e

    489713636K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20266.5x their median

    ๐Ÿ”ด ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—œ๐—”๐—ก๐—ข ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ ! โŒ ๐—–๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ท๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€ ? ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐— ๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ก๐—›๐—ข ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒฬ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ GUARDIOLA soutient City ๐Ÿš‘ RAPHINHA blessรฉ ? ๐Ÿ’ธ Juve Gros mercato ๐Ÿ” Inter ROMANO New CALHA ? ๐Ÿ‘‘ Roma MALEN Record = #RuizClub 01/10 https://t.co/tWmLxdSxUZ

    413347120K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20266.4x their median

    Josรฉ, mets un 9 !!!!!!! Il faut mettre Espรญ ! Et enfin "oser" sortir Vinicius. Le Brรฉsilien est Low battery depuis un moment maintenant ... #RealMadrid

    3794717723K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20266.2x their median

    ๐Ÿ”ด๐ŸŽฅ NOUVELLE VIDร‰O ๐Ÿ’ฅ ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—œ๐—”๐—ก๐—ข ๐Ÿ˜‰ ๐—ญ๐—œ๐——๐—”๐—ก๐—˜ "๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ-๐˜๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜" ๐Ÿ’ช ๐—ž๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐— ๐—œ๐—ก๐—˜ ๐Ÿš‘ Alarme RAPHINHA touchรฉ โš–๏ธ City reconnu coupable โœˆ๏ธ KOUNDร‰ Radar Bayern ๐Ÿ”ฅ L'heure THURAM ๐Ÿ’ธ Juventus โ‚ฌ250M en plus ๐ŸŽŠ Milan Mode "Fantasia" ๐Ÿ” DA CUNHA Transformation = #RuizClub Mercredi 30/09 #Football #Mercato #RealMadrid #Madrid #Barรงa #Barca #FCBarcelona #Barcelona #LaLiga #Portugal #SerieA #PremierLeague #City #Manchester #Juventus #Milan #Inter #Roma #Napoli #Yamal #Ballondor #Mbappe #Raphinha #France #Zidane

    392386124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20265.7x their median

    ๐Ÿ”ด Pourquoi ๐—™๐—˜๐—ฅ๐— ๐—œ๐—ก est-il le choix nยฐ1 de FLICK ? #Football #Barca #Barรงa #FCBarcelona #Barcelona #LaLiga #UCL #ChampionsLeague https://t.co/o8DrHwqrAN

    378165119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.5x their median

    ๐Ÿ”ด BARร‡A "PLAN B" LA LISTE DE DECO APRรˆS L'ร‰CHEC JULIรN รLVAREZ #Football #Barca #Barรงa #mercato #fcbarcelona #Barcelona #LaLiga https://t.co/nfEgCVOIXZ

    372105140K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20265.2x their median

    MVP #RealMadrid https://t.co/mf6zPogKd6

    341179012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ruizclub#football#mercato#realmadrid#madrid

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 593K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.527% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 62x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ruizclub, #football, #mercato.

What is ๐—”๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜‡'s engagement rate on X?
๐—”๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜‡ (@alexandreruiz) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 593,068 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, ๐—”๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜‡ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @alexandreruiz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @alexandreruiz post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going