Back to @alexandergold's profile

Alex Goldschmidt engagement report

@alexandergold - 83K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.41%
of 83K followers
Per impression
8.75%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
16.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.093%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 83K followers, an engagement rate of 1.41%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 8.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alex Goldschmidt's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.41%, Alex Goldschmidt sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 127 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 6, 202563x their median

    One thing about me? I’m going to keep it 100 on the land, the sea, the sky and pledge allegiance to your hands, your team, your vibes.

    33K5.6K1228412K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 202620x their median

    We know way too much about Taylor Swift’s wedding at Madison Square Garden for me to believe Taylor Swift is having a wedding at Madison Square Garden, but I’ve been wrong before.

    23K721108105649K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202620x their median

    I feel like we’re waiting for white smoke to come out of Madison Square Garden to signal the birth of America’s new royal family.

    22K1.6K3930291K viewsView on X
  • Feb 24, 201936x their median

    I will never be able to thank @taylorswift13 enough. 😭 I am the luckiest man in the world and now I don't know what @rossgirard and I will do for the wedding. https://t.co/WvhtNJdFuP

    19K2.4K234526View on X
  • Oct 27, 202513x their median

    The Fate of Ophelia still goes just as hard as it did on release night.

    14K1.1K2522162K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202520x their median

    Just remembered when I talked to Andrea Swift at the Eras Tour movie premiere and said how amazing it must be to witness this peak moment in her career and she looked offended that I insinuated it was her peak. She knew how wrong I was.

    12K15083338K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202519x their median

    We thought we were getting an Eras Tour documentary but we’re actually getting a second concert movie and a six-episode doc series. No one has ever kept us fed like this.

    11K58357108K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202518x their median

    Taylor Swift not only breaking but demolishing so many records shows just how out of touch the Internet is from the real world. If The Life of a Showgirl was so hated, streams wouldn’t be stable or rising every day. You can argue that variants did this but you can’t stream those.

    9.9K8016921182K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202512x their median

    Hate really rots your brain and the algorithms reward it. https://t.co/K9ATLUaDyW

    7.1K289211698K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202512x their median

    I’m not here to have critical thought. I’m here to be a golden retriever who enjoys the experience of listening to Taylor Swift’s music.

    6.9K5181413111K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 83K followers, an engagement rate of 1.41%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 8.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

What is Alex Goldschmidt's engagement rate on X?
Alex Goldschmidt (@alexandergold) has an engagement rate of 1.41%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 82,992 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.41%, Alex Goldschmidt sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @alexandergold have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @alexandergold post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going