Alex Goldschmidt engagement report
@alexandergold - 83K followers on X
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 83K followers, an engagement rate of 1.41%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 8.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Alex Goldschmidt's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.41%, Alex Goldschmidt sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 127 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 6, 202563x their median
One thing about me? I’m going to keep it 100 on the land, the sea, the sky and pledge allegiance to your hands, your team, your vibes.
- Jun 30, 202620x their median
We know way too much about Taylor Swift’s wedding at Madison Square Garden for me to believe Taylor Swift is having a wedding at Madison Square Garden, but I’ve been wrong before.
- Jul 3, 202620x their median
I feel like we’re waiting for white smoke to come out of Madison Square Garden to signal the birth of America’s new royal family.
- Feb 24, 201936x their median
I will never be able to thank @taylorswift13 enough. 😭 I am the luckiest man in the world and now I don't know what @rossgirard and I will do for the wedding. https://t.co/WvhtNJdFuP
- Oct 27, 202513x their median
The Fate of Ophelia still goes just as hard as it did on release night.
- Oct 9, 202520x their median
Just remembered when I talked to Andrea Swift at the Eras Tour movie premiere and said how amazing it must be to witness this peak moment in her career and she looked offended that I insinuated it was her peak. She knew how wrong I was.
- Oct 13, 202519x their median
We thought we were getting an Eras Tour documentary but we’re actually getting a second concert movie and a six-episode doc series. No one has ever kept us fed like this.
- Oct 8, 202518x their median
Taylor Swift not only breaking but demolishing so many records shows just how out of touch the Internet is from the real world. If The Life of a Showgirl was so hated, streams wouldn’t be stable or rising every day. You can argue that variants did this but you can’t stream those.
- Oct 7, 202512x their median
Hate really rots your brain and the algorithms reward it. https://t.co/K9ATLUaDyW
- Oct 3, 202512x their median
I’m not here to have critical thought. I’m here to be a golden retriever who enjoys the experience of listening to Taylor Swift’s music.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 83K followers, an engagement rate of 1.41%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 8.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.
- What is Alex Goldschmidt's engagement rate on X?
- Alex Goldschmidt (@alexandergold) has an engagement rate of 1.41%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 82,992 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.41%, Alex Goldschmidt sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @alexandergold have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @alexandergold post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.