Back to @alemsah's profile

Alemsah Ozturk engagement report

@alemsah - 245K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0%
of 245K followers
Per impression
0.056%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.72%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.056% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.724% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 1748x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Alemsah Ozturk sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 241 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 14, 20261748x their median

    https://t.co/j0l1maHOn3

    1.5K1674816402K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20269.0x their median

    I’m not interested in AI that gives us more ideas. I’m interested in something that helps us understand which ideas deserve to exist. The truth beneath them. The tension behind them. The judgment to choose them. Been building something. Soon. Drop a comment “BETA” to join https://t.co/6eLW7vqxFz

    30602.9K viewsView on X
  • May 21, 20269.0x their median

    Your AI product doesn't convert because the buyer already bought one like it. The demos were excellent. Production was not. Two people still babysit the tool. They're not skeptical of AI. They're skeptical of you. New Undercurrent ↓ https://t.co/WKGuHjMcRA

    70201.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.0x their median

    86% of companies stuck in pilot purgatory. Everyone blames the technology. The technology works. A pilot has a specific hypothesis, a success metric, a fixed end date, and a decision point. That is not a pilot. That is an alibi. → https://t.co/qJa8QnUdVc https://t.co/H45WL4dheo

    20201.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20264.0x their median

    97% deployed AI agents. 29% see ROI. 75% admit the strategy is for show. The gap has a name. New Undercurrent: → https://t.co/7rgbNfMdCM https://t.co/3Z7nsdMICv

    30102.8K viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 20264.0x their median

    Most Web3 summits talk about wealth at scale. This one is built by people already doing it. @ZIGChain Summit. Powered by @Disrupt_com Dubai. April 28. Register: https://t.co/v2XgdzIjxG

    30101.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.0x their median

    Sept 10: @AnthropicAI 's economists publish a model where AI never improves itself. Sept 12: @AnthropicAI 's CEO says we must slow down because AI is now improving itself. 48 hours. Same company. Only one has numbers. → https://t.co/OwuRJ2URra https://t.co/dVbp1O17yu

    20101.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.0x their median

    116 companies signed a letter warning AI cyberattacks will overwhelm defenders within months. No commitments. No deadlines. No named owner. A recall names the defect and pays for the fix. This names the risk and hands it to you. https://t.co/ElOCma2Xge https://t.co/iqgGLNHuic

    30001.8K viewsView on X
  • Mar 13, 20263.0x their median

    my new article is out : The ADHD Advantage #adhd https://t.co/VkAJAWhFuW

    0030590 viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.0x their median

    ChatGPT Ads self-serve: open since May 5. CPC: $3–5. Google enterprise CPC: $15–80. LinkedIn B2B CPC: $8–15. 20% of ChatGPT queries have direct commercial intent. Most CMOs haven't touched it. → https://t.co/R6FO6GeCtk https://t.co/mY1Eyvd9SI

    10101.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.056% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.724% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 1748x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Alemsah Ozturk's engagement rate on X?
Alemsah Ozturk (@alemsah) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 244,897 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Alemsah Ozturk sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @alemsah have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @alemsah post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going