Back to @akafaceUS's profile

aka engagement report

@akafaceUS - 762K followers on X

Measured over 91 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.046%
of 762K followers
Per impression
1.61%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
2.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
352
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.43/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 352 interactions against 762K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 91 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 91 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 222x its own typical post.

Measured over 91 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

aka's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.046%, aka sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video5% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 5% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 182 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 2026222x their median

    If a Right Wing extremist assassinated the most prolific youth organizer on the Left under a Democratic administration, they would outlaw conservative politics by the next morning. Yet we allow Hasan Piker and the DSA to gloat over the murder of Charlie Kirk with impunity.

    71K5.5K1.5K2291.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202625x their median

    If you’ve been in office for 15 years, you probably shouldn’t still be campaigning on the exact same problem you promised to fix 15 years ago. I'm looking at you Elizabeth Warren.

    7.7K1.0K45533K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202622x their median

    I think we all know why she's going viral. 👀 https://t.co/j7V8tJxad7

    7.4K185273291.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202617x their median

    AOC will talk about how she's got student loans (That she could've paid off years ago) and how she's "just like you" broke and struggling.. But the reality is she goes from place to place on a private jet sipping champaign with billionaires.. The woman is a fraud and has always been a fraud. The only reason she broke off her engagement is because she'd have to disclose his finances (he's worth hundreds of millions.) Yeah broke bartender my ass

    4.9K1.1K441241K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202614x their median

    Stamattina sono andato all'Apple store per vedere il nuovo iPhone 18. Veramente tanta roba. https://t.co/Il1D8JIWTK

    4.6K19314027508K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202612x their median

    It's actually crazy to me how Nancy Pelosi got away with insider trading for so many years with absolutely nothing being done about it.

    3.4K4182331729K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202611x their median

    Apparently parents want all classrooms recorded now so they can see what the kids are learning

    3.2K2753463945K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20268.2x their median

    I honestly think we’d be better off if student loans didn’t exist, at least not in the way they do today. Think about how crazy the system is. We let 18-year-olds borrow tens of thousands of dollars for in a lot of cases a useless degree. And because students can borrow so much money, colleges know they can charge ridiculous prices. Tuition keeps climbing, students keep borrowing, and everyone acts surprised when people graduate buried in debt. If all that easy money disappeared, colleges would actually have to compete for students at prices normal families could afford.

    2.0K3405084237K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.1x their median

    Obama care is the worst piece of legislation ever created. It was supposed to make healthcare more affordable but instead it made it so the average American has to pay an insane amount for basic coverage. Americans spend $5 trillion a year on healthcare and costs the average family $27,000 a year on family insurance plans.. People have deductibles so high that they avoid going to the doctor all together unless they absolutely have too. This bill was a "feel good" bill wrapped in dogshit because Obama wanted his name on something. Biden may have been the biggest retard to ever become president but Obama was by far the most consequential.

    2.2K3332752660K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.5x their median

    Does anyone else find it kind of hilarious that BLM pushed so hard for body cams on police officers, and a lot of the footage ended up showing exactly what people already suspected? For the most part, cops are just doing their jobs, while "some of the people" they’re dealing with are completely unhinged.

    2.0K20542224K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 352 interactions against 762K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 91 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 91 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 222x its own typical post.

What is aka's engagement rate on X?
aka (@akafaceUS) has an engagement rate of 0.046%, based on the median interactions across 91 original posts from the last 30 days against 761,914 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.046%, aka sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @akafaceUS have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @akafaceUS post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going