Back to @aj_inapi's profile

AJ Inapi (Allan) engagement report

@aj_inapi - 68K followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.115%
of 68K followers
Per impression
5.91%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.95%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
76
interactions (median)
Saved
0.154%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 76 interactions against 68K followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 5.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 301x its own typical post.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

AJ Inapi (Allan)'s engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.115%, AJ Inapi (Allan) sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video69% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 1725 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 2026301x their median

    🚨 WE ARE WATCHING AN EXTRAORDINARY PSYCHOLOGICAL BATTLE OVER PERCEPTION. Turn on the media and you'd think EVERYTHING is dramatically worse under President Trump. Then look at the numbers. Compared with the same stage of Biden's presidency, the figures being circulated show: INFLATION 🟦 Biden: +12.3% 🟥 Trump: +4.3% GROCERIES 🟦 Biden: +15.8% 🟥 Trump: +3.3% GAS 🟦 Biden: +69% 🟥 Trump: +12% RENT 🟦 Biden: +7.7% 🟥 Trump: +4.5% ELECTRICITY 🟦 Biden: +19.1% 🟥 Trump: +8.4% NEW & USED CARS 🟦 Biden: +23.9% 🟥 Trump: −1.2% That doesn't mean Americans aren't feeling real affordability pressure. They ARE. But during Biden's term, I REMEMBER the media making it feel like everything was fine but the opposite was felt by Americans in the real world. Today, it seems to be the opposite. People's conditions are improving but the perception is that life is worse. That's exactly why you have to separate how people feel, what they're being told, and what the underlying data actually show. We're heading toward the 2026 midterms. QUESTION EVERYTHING. CHECK THE NUMBERS YOURSELF. 🇺🇸

    14K7.7K587446303K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202620x their median

    I'm seeing A LOT of these posts: "I'm 50, 60, 70, 80 years old. I've voted Republican all my life, and this current Congress has done nothing for Americans, so I'M SITTING THIS ONE OUT." Okay. When you mention your age, do you ever stop and think about what that age is supposed to represent? You're not a teenager anymore. You're not 21 and figuring out how the world works. You're 50. 60. 61. 62. At some point, AGE is supposed to come with WISDOM. Have you taken the time to understand how your government actually works? What the President controls? What Congress controls? What the House can do? What the Senate can do? How many votes legislation requires? What the courts can stop? What individual members of Congress can and CANNOT accomplish? Or do you just look around, get angry that everything you wanted hasn't happened fast enough and decide: "SCREW IT. I'M STAYING HOME." And then announce it publicly like you've just revealed some profound political strategy. Have you ever stopped and thought: "Maybe this post is dumb?" Seriously. Because when you're 60, 70 or 80 years old, you carry another responsibility. There are younger Americans watching you. Your children. Your grandchildren. People in your church. People in your community. People who haven't lived through what you've lived through. YOU are supposed to be transferring knowledge to THEM. You're supposed to be able to explain what worked. What failed. What mistakes your generation made. How government actually functions. How political power is gained. How political power is lost. And how younger generations can make BETTER decisions than your generation did. Instead, some of you are basically saying: "I've been participating in this system for 40 or 50 years. I didn't get everything I wanted, so now I'm taking my ball and going home." WHAT? 😂 You're allowed to be angry. You're allowed to be disappointed. You're allowed to criticize Congress. You're allowed to criticize Republicans. You're allowed to demand MORE from the people you elected. In fact, YOU SHOULD. But frustration is not a substitute for understanding how the system works. If you're going to announce your age as evidence that you've seen enough to know better... THEN KNOW BETTER. You're 50, 60, 70 or 80 years old. You've lived through Presidents. Recessions. Wars. Inflation. Political scandals. Booms. Crashes. Republican governments. Democratic governments. Decades of American history. That experience should produce WISDOM. And wisdom should be passed DOWN. Not wasted. The younger generation already has TikTok, algorithms, influencers, propaganda, AI-generated garbage and 30-second clips trying to teach them how the world works. They need grandparents and parents who actually understand the system. So before posting: "I'M SITTING THIS ONE OUT." Maybe sit down first. Think. Read. Understand the consequences of participating AND not participating. Then make your decision. You're the elder generation. ACT LIKE IT. AJ Inapi

    8343322934916K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202612x their median

    President Trump had to take the heat over the conflict with Iran to move the center of geopolitics and the oil supply to the Western Hemisphere with minimal casualties, so YOUR children and grandchildren DO NOT have to fight and die in FOREVER WARS in the Middle-East as they have for decades. Many of you are old enough to be my parents or grandparents. I thought that as people get older, they’re supposed to get wiser. What’s up with that? God created human beings with brains, some people need to use it so we don't have to try to convince them with numbers, long ass posts, complex analysis, etc. Just use that thing between your ears so you can see what the President is doing. I am from Papua New Guinea, thousands of miles away. I should be paid for even doing this full time. Step one: Open your eyes and ears Step two: Start from the vision, see the policies and see the direction being set. Step three: Just get out and vote for Republicans so the cycle STOPS in November. Thank you for your attention to this matter AJ Inapi

    57923847155.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202611x their median

    There will always be a @LeaderJohnThune in the system to protect its interests. Oftentimes those interests do not align with what the voters want. Thune didn't teleport his way into Congress. Thune hasn't been in Congress this long because he chose to. You as the voter decided that people like Thune should remain in office despite the fact that they keep on going against your will. This November, don't rush to take out the likes of Thune. You have to be strategic. Replace the ones you can this November and do a MASS REPLACEMENT in 2028. That's the most effective way to make Washington work for you. Not sitting out elections and expecting miracles to happen. If you are of voting age, be a responsible ADULT.

    49924487114.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20265.6x their median

    Let's just say we STOPPED blaming President Trump for a minute. Can anyone tell me what the Democrats plan is to fix America if they win the midterms? What have they said or done that's so appealing to Americans that they are looking forward to giving them the power in November? Are we now saying that in order for America to get back on track, the answer is letting Democrats win in November? Please comment with at least ONE thing the Democrats have said or done that totally made you think, "My God, these are our real saviors"

    2401265293.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.2x their median

    Question President Trump. Question the war. Question tariffs. Question EVERY administration. That's your job as citizens. But don't pretend America's economic, industrial and geopolitical problems suddenly appeared in 2026. They were built over DECADES. And reversing decades of decisions - if America chooses to reverse them - will not happen without costs, trade-offs and mistakes. The generation that watched factories close experienced the pain of America's economic transformation going OUT. Today's generation may experience some of the pain of trying to bring strategic industries BACK. Study the history. Then decide for yourself whether the price America is paying today is buying something worth having tomorrow.

    2531201673.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20265.1x their median

    🚨 I THINK PEOPLE ARE MISSING THE MUCH BIGGER STORY BETWEEN PRESIDENT TRUMP AND CANADA. Forget individual refinery headlines for a moment. Step back. Canada has enjoyed an extraordinary position in the American energy market. In 2025, Canada supplied 63.4% of ALL U.S. crude oil imports - roughly 3.9 MILLION barrels every single day. And roughly 90% of Canada's crude exports went to America. Think about what that means. America depends heavily on Canadian oil. But Canada depends even MORE heavily on having America as its customer. That relationship has given Canada an incredibly valuable, secure market directly across its border. Now look at what is changing. 🇻🇪 VENEZUELA IS COMING BACK INTO THE AMERICAN ENERGY SYSTEM. U.S. imports of Venezuelan crude went from roughly: January: 200,000 barrels/day June: 630,000 barrels/day And preliminary September data have reached as high as 782,000 barrels/day. That's an enormous increase in months. And here's the part people need to understand: Venezuela doesn't just have a lot of oil. It has enormous quantities of HEAVY crude. Guess what Canada sells America? A LOT OF HEAVY CRUDE. Guess what many sophisticated American refineries were specifically designed to process? HEAVY CRUDE. So Venezuela doesn't simply give America "more oil." It potentially gives American refiners something far more strategically important: ANOTHER SUPPLIER. That's competition. And competition changes leverage. Now zoom out even further. America has enormous shale production. Canada has enormous oil-sands production. Venezuela has the world's largest proven oil reserves. Guyana is rapidly becoming another major producer. Brazil continues expanding offshore production. Mexico remains deeply connected to the American energy system. And sitting in the middle of all of it is the United States with one of the world's most sophisticated refining, pipeline, storage, financial and export systems. THAT is the bigger picture I believe is emerging. President Trump isn't simply trying to get "cheap oil." He appears to be helping build something far more strategically powerful: 🇺🇸 A WESTERN HEMISPHERE ENERGY SYSTEM WITH AMERICA AT ITS CENTER. Not dependent on ONE country. Not dependent on ONE oil field. Not dependent on ONE shipping lane. And increasingly less exposed to ONE geopolitical chokepoint halfway around the world. That's why I believe people are looking at the Canada fight too narrowly. Prime Minister Mark Carney is simultaneously trying to reduce Canada's dependence on America and deepen Canada's relationship with Europe. That's happening RIGHT NOW. Carney has openly called for deeper Canada-EU cooperation in energy, critical minerals, defense, AI and other strategic industries. Meanwhile President Trump is applying enormous trade pressure on Canada. So look at this as a chessboard rather than another daily political headline. Canada wants alternatives to America. America is developing alternatives to Canada. Canada is expanding its ability to ship oil toward Asia through Trans Mountain. America is reopening access to Venezuelan heavy crude. Chevron is expanding in Venezuela. Exxon is reportedly negotiating its own return. American companies are moving back into one of the greatest concentrations of oil reserves on Earth. THAT changes the negotiating environment. And here's the important distinction: I don't think America needs to "replace" Canadian oil. That would actually miss the point. Canada is an enormously valuable, reliable and geographically convenient energy partner. What America needs is OPTIONS. Canada. Venezuela. Guyana. Brazil. Mexico. Domestic American production. Multiple producers competing for access to the world's biggest economy and its massive refining system. Because when your country has multiple suppliers, no single supplier owns the leverage. And when producers compete for American refinery demand, America gains negotiating power. Meanwhile the Middle East becomes less capable of holding the American economy hostage to events thousands of miles away. THAT may ultimately be what President Trump is creating. Not American dependence on Venezuelan oil. Not American dependence on Canadian oil. Not American dependence on Middle Eastern oil. AMERICAN ENERGY OPTIONALITY. A Western Hemisphere energy powerhouse with the United States sitting at the center of production, refining, capital, infrastructure and consumption. Canada can sell to Asia. Venezuela can sell elsewhere. Brazil can sell elsewhere. That's free markets. But they all have to compete. And competition destroys monopolistic leverage. That is the story underneath the headlines that I think deserves FAR more attention. The fight with Canada may ultimately be about much more than tariffs. It may be part of a fundamental restructuring of who has leverage over the American economy for the next generation. 🇺🇸

    2421102988.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20264.5x their median

    God forbid Democrats win the midterms because they convinced enough Republican voters to sit it out - and somehow convinced them THEY were the solution to their problems. Because apparently Republicans enjoyed the Biden years so much they couldn't get enough: “Yeah, LET’S RUN IT BACK.” Sitting out doesn’t make the consequences sit out with you.

    216893432.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20264.1x their median

    🚨 “WHY ISN'T PRESIDENT TRUMP DEPORTING THEM FASTER?” I see this frustration constantly from a subset in the MAGA camp. This is a LONG post but STOP what you're doing and read it completely and most importantly UNDERSTAND what you're reading. Lets go.... Millions of illegal aliens entered America during the border crisis. President Trump comes back into office, shuts down the flow, and naturally people ask: WHY AREN'T MILLIONS BEING DEPORTED IMMEDIATELY? Here's what I think many Americans are missing. STOPPING THE INFLOW and REMOVING THE PEOPLE ALREADY INSIDE THE COUNTRY are two completely different operations. Think about a ship taking on water. FIRST, you plug the hole. That's the border. Then you have to pump out the millions of gallons already inside. That's deportation. And pumping it out is enormously more complicated. You cannot simply grab millions of people, put them on buses and dump them across the Mexican border. Many aren't Mexican. They may be from Venezuela, Haiti, China, India, Central America, Africa, the Middle East or dozens of other countries. So follow what actually has to happen. 1. FIND THEM. ICE has to identify and locate aliens subject to enforcement and you've seen the protests and court orders left right and center. That process requires officers, intelligence, databases, vehicles, warrants or other legal authority where applicable, surveillance and coordination with other agencies. 2. ARREST AND PROCESS THEM. Identity has to be confirmed. Immigration status has to be established. Existing removal orders, criminal history and other case information have to be checked. 3. DETAIN THEM - IF DETENTION IS AUTHORIZED AND AVAILABLE. Now you need beds. Not just a giant fenced field. Actual detention facilities with guards, food, sanitation, utilities, administration and medical care. DHS reported that the average direct adult detention-bed cost was about $187 PER PERSON PER DAY in FY2023. Do the arithmetic. 100,000 people detained at that historical daily rate: ~$18.7 MILLION PER DAY. One million simultaneously? ~$187 MILLION PER DAY. And that's before pretending detention capacity can magically expand to ONE MILLION BEDS overnight. It can't. 4. PROVIDE MEDICAL CARE AND HUMANE CONDITIONS. Remember we are talking about America here. People in federal custody still have to be fed, housed safely and receive required medical care. ICE's health system handled medical services or health-standard oversight involving hundreds of thousands of detained aliens in FY2025. Before removal, ICE also have to determine whether someone is medically fit to travel. Why does this matter? Because if President Trump simply threw millions of people into makeshift camps without adequate food, sanitation, medical treatment or legal safeguards, you already know exactly what would happen. The lawsuits would start immediately. The media would run the images 24/7. Democratic politicians and immigration groups would challenge the operation. Federal courts would become another battlefield. So the administration has to build an enforcement MACHINE capable of operating at scale while surviving legal scrutiny. 5. DEAL WITH THE COURTS. This is another enormous bottleneck. Some aliens already have final removal orders. Others don't. Removal proceedings can involve an immigration judge determining whether somebody is removable. The alien may seek relief from removal. There can be hearings. Evidence. Legal arguments. And certain decisions can be appealed. That takes judges. Courtrooms. Government attorneys. ICE personnel. Administrative staff. And TIME. This is a massive billion dollar industry on its own. 6. GET THE DESTINATION COUNTRY TO TAKE THEM. America cannot magically teleport someone home. ICE may need travel documentation and coordination with the receiving country. Then transportation has to be arranged. 7. ACTUALLY REMOVE THEM. Now you're talking buses, aircraft, ICE Air Operations, security personnel, flight crews, medical support where necessary and international logistics. Multiply that by HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS. Then MILLIONS. Now you understand the scale. And here's something else people need to understand: DETENTION CAPACITY IS PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE. You can't deport 1 million people simultaneously if you've only built capacity for a fraction of that population. Construction of facilities takes months. In FY2024, ICE's average daily detained population was only a little over 37,000 people. So when MAGA asks: “WHY CAN'T THEY JUST DEPORT 5 MILLION PEOPLE THIS YEAR?” My answer is: Look at the logistics. Even if the political will exists, you need: - ICE agents - detention beds - guards - medical staff - immigration judges - government lawyers - transportation - aircraft - travel documents - foreign-government cooperation - and BILLIONS OF DOLLARS. And every stage has to operate under American law. That's why shutting down the border FIRST was so important. Imagine trying to empty a swimming pool while somebody keeps pouring water into it. STOP THE WATER FIRST. Then increase the size of the pumps. That's essentially what America has to do now. - Border crossings dramatically down. - Then expand ICE manpower. - Expand detention capacity. - Increase court capacity. - Prioritize criminal aliens and people with final removal orders. - Increase removal flights. - Pressure countries to accept their nationals. - And systematically work through the population already in the country. Here's the uncomfortable reality: America accumulated this problem over YEARS. Physically and legally unwinding it at massive scale was never going to happen in 30 days. And trying to do it recklessly would create operational failures, enormous waste and legal challenges that could actually SLOW deportations down. In fact, GAO has already documented what can happen when detention capacity is expanded too quickly: ICE's huge Camp East Montana facility was rushed into operation, developed serious deficiencies and produced millions of dollars in waste. That should tell MAGA something important. - Demand SPEED. - Demand RESULTS. - Demand DEPORTATIONS. - Demand that Congress fund the manpower, courts, detention capacity and transportation necessary to enforce immigration law. But also understand the size of the machine required to do this lawfully and humanely. President Trump shutting down the influx was STEP ONE. Building enough capacity to remove illegal aliens already inside America at enormous scale is STEP TWO. And unlike a campaign slogan, Step Two requires thousands of people, enormous infrastructure, international cooperation, due process where applicable and a hell of a lot of money. YOU CAN CLOSE A DOOR QUICKLY. REMOVING MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO ALREADY WALKED THROUGH IT IS AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT OPERATION. I hope people can share this far and wide to educate the masses.

    16310230133.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.0x their median

    You allow them into your country and they steal from you and you want that to continue? If I were an American, I'd make it a point to bring as many people as I could to vote for Republicans in the midterms so President Trump can continue the cleanup process. I don't know any sane human being that would watch what's unfolding and then sit out the midterms. The names and data don't lie........ I don't see any American names there.

    181981931.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 76 interactions against 68K followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 5.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 301x its own typical post.

What is AJ Inapi (Allan)'s engagement rate on X?
AJ Inapi (Allan) (@aj_inapi) has an engagement rate of 0.115%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 67,544 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.115%, AJ Inapi (Allan) sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @aj_inapi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @aj_inapi post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going