Back to @airtminc's profile

Airtm engagement report

@airtminc - 179K followers on X

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 179K followers
Per impression
0.524%
4.8K views on a typical post
Reach
2.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
25
interactions (median)
Saved
0.042%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 179K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.8K times each, and 0.524% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 16% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 419x its own typical post.

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Airtm's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Airtm sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 19, 2025419x their median

    USDC is the digital dollar.

    8.6K7199402351.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20264.7x their median

    La tarjeta virtual de Airtm no tiene mantenimiento mensual. La creas, la cargas con tu saldo USDC, y la usas. Así de simple.

    881018110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.8x their median

    PayPal te cobra comisión por recibir. PayPal te cobra comisión por retirar. PayPal te cobra por el tipo de cambio. ¿Ya probaste una alternativa que no te coma tus ganancias?

    63112016.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20263.2x their median

    Emitir tu Tarjeta Virtual USD en Airtm no tiene costo. Tampoco hay mantenimiento mensual ni monto mínimo para abrirla. La creas desde la app y pagas con los dólares que ya tienes en tu cuenta.

    4982308.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.7x their median

    ACH y Wire son las dos formas de recibir en tu Cuenta Virtual USA. No son lo mismo y la diferencia te puede costar plata. ACH: lo que usan las empresas para nómina y proveedores. Tarda unos días hábiles. Wire: llega más rápido, pero suele tener un costo por operación. Si tu cliente te pregunta cuál usar, ACH resuelve la mayoría de los casos.

    4981106.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20262.7x their median

    Mucha gente escucha "Cuenta Virtual USA" y asume que es una billetera con un nombre lindo. No es eso. Qué es exactamente 🧵

    4991007.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.3x their median

    Dato útil para arrancar septiembre: La Cuenta Virtual USA de Airtm es real. Tiene routing y account number a tu nombre. No es una cuenta "virtual" tipo prepago. Es una cuenta bancaria que puedes usar para recibir pagos ACH de cualquier empresa de EE.UU.

    428706.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.2x their median

    La tarjeta virtual de Airtm funciona en cualquier comercio que acepte Visa. Netflix ✓ Spotify ✓ ChatGPT ✓ Google Ads ✓ Meta Ads ✓ Amazon ✓ Y miles más.

    3461505.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.1x their median

    Estamos realizando un mantenimiento programado. Volveremos a estar funcionando con normalidad pronto. 🌍♥️

    2732205.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.0x their median

    Activar tu Tarjeta Virtual USD en Airtm no te cuesta nada. No hay costo de emisión ni mantenimiento mensual, y no necesitas un mínimo para abrirla. La activas desde la app y la usas donde acepten Visa.

    3351106.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 179K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.8K times each, and 0.524% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 16% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 419x its own typical post.

What is Airtm's engagement rate on X?
Airtm (@airtminc) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 178,831 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Airtm sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @airtminc have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @airtminc post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going