Back to @aguinaldaosilva's profile

aguinaldo silva engagement report

@aguinaldaosilva - 668K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 668K followers
Per impression
1.05%
8.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
92
interactions (median)
Saved
0.057%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 668K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 385x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

aguinaldo silva's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, aguinaldo silva sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 81 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 29, 2026385x their median

    Falei que "Três Graças" seria meu último trabalho, porém... Acabei assinando contrato para escrever mais uma novela e quer saber? Só pra contrariar os haters,depois desse assinarei mais um contrato, até chegar aos 90 anos trabalhando.

    32K1.2K1.2K702616K viewsView on X
  • Mar 27, 2026220x their median

    https://t.co/9qtiqOp6G9

    28K5.9K152116294K viewsView on X
  • Feb 25, 202613x their median

    Agradeço comovido: obrigado. https://t.co/dN5D99v2hi

    24K1.0K32968204K viewsView on X
  • May 5, 2026250x their median

    Obrigado por ter percebido que era uma citação de um dos momentos mais icônicos da história do cinema. https://t.co/5GJUDRvoxy

    21K1.5K216285466K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 2026136x their median

    Numa das primeiras cenas de "Senhora do Destino" em 2004, enquanto banha a filhinha no rio São Francisco, Carolina Dieckman diz a ela: "vai dar tudo certo, minha linda!" E gente, no fim deu tudo certo, pra elas e acho que também pra mim... pois ainda estou aqui. https://t.co/pQgOXDoJmG

    12K2669138192K viewsView on X
  • Feb 25, 20265.3x their median

    https://t.co/8rmdkxlcto

    8.9K97528976129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202681x their median

    Em 1972, num fim de mundo qualquer da Argentina, depois de viajar até lá dirigindo um fusca. Com esse visual, é espantoso que eu tenha voltado para o Brasil são e salvo... https://t.co/BMfkdko4NL

    7.1K80124195963K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202665x their median

    Desço no aeroporto e mal chego ao saguão sou abordado por um rapaz que, de microfone em punho, me pergunta: "você é um famoso?..." Minha resposta: "estou passando mal, me ajude!!!" Em resposta, o rapaz recolheu o microfone , disfarçou e saiu correndo.

    5.7K1398348243K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202649x their median

    Aos 83 anos posso afirmar com toda segurança: ficar sem trabalhar é muito chato. A gente acorda, faz tudo que tem pra fazer e ainda não é meio-dia! Agora que a novela acabou terei que arranjar uma ocupação... Nem que seja lavar uma trouxa de roupa. Vocês o que acham?

    4.0K8334348115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 202644x their median

    Em 1970, na minha 1a. casa no Rio, meu amigo gasparino Damata deu-me uma muda dessa planta e disse: "é sua árvore da vida. Não deixe ela morrer". Desde então ela está em todas minhas casas. Essa é a do meu escritório em Lisboa. https://t.co/1zv50ZoQL1

    4.0K36571146K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 668K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 385x its own typical post.

What is aguinaldo silva's engagement rate on X?
aguinaldo silva (@aguinaldaosilva) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 667,725 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, aguinaldo silva sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @aguinaldaosilva have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @aguinaldaosilva post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going