Back to @aghplt's profile

Ali Gholhaki engagement report

@aghplt - 100K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.45%
of 100K followers
Per impression
1.71%
85K views on a typical post
Reach
85.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.075%
64 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 1.45%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 85K times each, and 1.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 85.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ali Gholhaki's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.45%, Ali Gholhaki sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.435% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • May 16, 202615x their median

    The world stands at the cusp of a new order. As President Xi said “The transformation unseen in a century is accelerating across the globe,” and I emphasize that the Iranian nation’s 70-day resistance has accelerated this transformation. The future belongs to the Global South.

    17K3.8K935191850K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 202612x their median

    The sudden death of Lindsey Graham can be the black mark sent to Trump. I doubt it were Iranians. Most realistic it was Mossad job in order to push Trump to renew full scale war with Iran. It clearly means “you are the next”. Lindsey Graham was the shadow of Trump, his black self

    13K2.6K1.3K5561.5M viewsView on X
  • May 12, 20263.3x their median

    یکی از گزینه‌های ایران در صورت حمله مجدد می‌تواند غنی‌سازی ۹۰ درصد باشد. در مجلس بررسی می‌کنیم.

    2.8K5591.3K158391K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 20262.4x their median

    https://t.co/gQszJO77Et

    2.9K23230217173K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.1x their median

    پیش‌تر نوشتم که آمریکایی‌ها با کشتی‌های خاصی اقدام به تراشیدن صخره‌های تیز و مزاحم در مسیر جنوبِ تنگه هرمز (عمان) نموده‌اند که مسیر تردد کشتی‌ها در آن «کریدور» را هموار کنند. «انتقالِ بی‌سروصدای نفت از مسیر جنوبِ تنگه هرمز توسط آمریکا»، سکه‌ی تنگه را از رونق خواهد انداخت؛ در صورت ادامه این اتفاق، آمریکا نه «محاصره» را رفع خواهد کرد، نه تحریمی لَغ خواهد شد و نه پولی آزاد می‌گردد!

    2.3K17643177301K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20261.7x their median

    «قطر» قرار بود ۶میلیارد دلاری که از کره وارد این کشور گردید را به علاوه‌ی ۶میلیارد دلارِ دیگر _جمعا ۱۲میلیارد دلار_ در گام اولِ تفاهمنامه برای ایران آزاد کند؛ اولی را اوفک (دفتر کنترل داراییِ خارجیِ وزارت خزانه‌داری آمریکا) مستقیما جلویش را گرفت و دومی را نیز خود قطر همراهی نکرد!

    2.0K18929242155K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20261.5x their median

    «قطر» تعهدی که در روندِ میانجیگری به ایران داده بود را اجرا نکرد؛ «عمان» هم اگر چه پیگیرِ تعیینِ حقوقِ تنگه هرمز در مجامعِ بین‌المللی بود _اما تحت فشارِ آمریکا_ عامل اصلی تنشِ اخیر در تنگه شده است! علتِ تغییرِ رفتار «ایران» در قِبالِ این دو کشور را در بدعهدی‌هایِ خودشان ببینید!

    1.8K13922019113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20261.5x their median

    ایران بنا دارد اگر «زیرساخت‌های انرژی‌»اش در حمله آمریکا و اسرائیل مورد آسیبِ گسترده قرار بگیرد، تا حدِ توان «زیرساخت‌های حیاتیِ منطقه و اسرائیل» را هدفِ حمله قرار دهد

    1.6K8644736124K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 2026

    «رهبر سوم انقلاب» با متنِ جدید پیشنهادی که توسطِ روسای جمهورِ ایران و آمریکا امضا شد، موافق نبودند؛ امشب هم به صراحت اعلام کردند. «یادداشتِ تفاهم»، در رای گیری اول منفی شد و در رای‌گیری دوم رای مثبت گرفت! از «مُفادِ یادداشتِ تفاهم» _که برآوردم این است که بخش قابل توجهی از آن محقق نمی‌شود_ «پایداریِ توافق» در نمی‌آید! احتمالا «عدم امضای یادداشت تفاهم توسط قالیباف» و «امضای پزشکیان»، به دلیل همین ملاحظات و مخالفت‌ها بوده است. بنظر آمریکا از فرصتِ جام‌جهانی استفاده می‌کند تا پس از آن از برنامه‌ی اصلی رونمایی کنند؛ آنهم اگر اسرائیل پیش‌دستی نکند!

    1.5K15438845193K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 2026

    «امارات» بابت خساراتی که از جنگ رمضان دیده بود، به درخواستِ خودش بخشی از فرآیند تامین مالی «تفاهم‌نامه اسلام آباد» را بر عهده‌ گرفت؛ حتی یک قدمِ موثر هم برداشت، ولی دیده شدن پهپادهای ساخت این کشور در آسمانِ ایران نشان می‌دهد که در بر همان پاشنه می‌چرخد. باید دید واکنش ایران چیست!

    1.6K12197380K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 1.45%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 3,810 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 85K times each, and 1.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 85.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is Ali Gholhaki's engagement rate on X?
Ali Gholhaki (@aghplt) has an engagement rate of 1.45%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 100,078 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.45%, Ali Gholhaki sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @aghplt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,810 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @aghplt post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going