Ali Gholhaki engagement report
@aghplt - 102K followers on X
Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 102K followers, an engagement rate of 1.34%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 110K times each, and 1.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 107.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #ذینفعان.
Compared with accounts its own size
Ali Gholhaki's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.34%, Ali Gholhaki sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 14% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 14% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 419 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 16, 202615x their median
The world stands at the cusp of a new order. As President Xi said “The transformation unseen in a century is accelerating across the globe,” and I emphasize that the Iranian nation’s 70-day resistance has accelerated this transformation. The future belongs to the Global South.
- Jul 12, 202612x their median
The sudden death of Lindsey Graham can be the black mark sent to Trump. I doubt it were Iranians. Most realistic it was Mossad job in order to push Trump to renew full scale war with Iran. It clearly means “you are the next”. Lindsey Graham was the shadow of Trump, his black self
- May 12, 20263.3x their median
یکی از گزینههای ایران در صورت حمله مجدد میتواند غنیسازی ۹۰ درصد باشد. در مجلس بررسی میکنیم.
- Sep 24, 20262.7x their median
«محاصره هوایی ایران» (لغو شدن پروازهای ایران به کشورهای همسایه، منطقه و دیگر نقاط دنیا)، پیوستِ «محاصره دریایی» است! اینکه کشورهایی چون آذربایجان، ترکمنستان، امارات و حتی عراق، جسارتِ لغو پروازهای ایران را عطفِ به هشدارهایِ آمریکا داشتند، یعنی تهدیدِ دیروز ایران مبنی بر ناامنی فرودگاههای دیگر کشورها، اصلا برای آنها معتبر نبوده! اگر اقدامِ موثری برای جلوگیری از ایجاد «محاصرهی هوایی» بر آسمانِ اطراف ایران نشود، آمریکا وارد فازِ اخلال در «مرزهای زمینی» خواهد شد!
- Jun 7, 20262.5x their median
https://t.co/gQszJO77Et
- Aug 19, 20262.2x their median
پیشتر نوشتم که آمریکاییها با کشتیهای خاصی اقدام به تراشیدن صخرههای تیز و مزاحم در مسیر جنوبِ تنگه هرمز (عمان) نمودهاند که مسیر تردد کشتیها در آن «کریدور» را هموار کنند. «انتقالِ بیسروصدای نفت از مسیر جنوبِ تنگه هرمز توسط آمریکا»، سکهی تنگه را از رونق خواهد انداخت؛ در صورت ادامه این اتفاق، آمریکا نه «محاصره» را رفع خواهد کرد، نه تحریمی لَغ خواهد شد و نه پولی آزاد میگردد!
- Jul 17, 20261.8x their median
«قطر» قرار بود ۶میلیارد دلاری که از کره وارد این کشور گردید را به علاوهی ۶میلیارد دلارِ دیگر _جمعا ۱۲میلیارد دلار_ در گام اولِ تفاهمنامه برای ایران آزاد کند؛ اولی را اوفک (دفتر کنترل داراییِ خارجیِ وزارت خزانهداری آمریکا) مستقیما جلویش را گرفت و دومی را نیز خود قطر همراهی نکرد!
- Sep 27, 20261.8x their median
«همهی شرایط در منطقه» شبیه به «بهمنِ ۱۴۰۴» است!
- Sep 10, 20261.8x their median
دبیر شُعام تلویحا اقدام ایران در برابر کُنش خصمانه «شورای حکام آژانس بین المللی انرژی اتمی» درباره «ارجاعِ پرونده هستهای ایران به شورای امنیت سازمان ملل» و یا حتی «حمله به تاسیسات جدید ایران _مثل کوهِ کلنگ_» را «خروج از NPT» اعلام کرد. خروجِ ایران از «ان پی تی» و آغاز جدی بخشِ نظامیِ فعالیتهای هستهای ایران، در شرایطِ فعلی پشتیبانی افکار عمومی را دارد؛ اگر ایران تصمیم به این اقدام حساس گرفت، باید در کمترین زمان ممکن به خروجی _یعتی حداقل یک آزمایش_ برسد! امیدوارم خیلی دیر نشده باشد!
- Sep 7, 20261.7x their median
از دست رفتنِ «جبهه یمن»، موضع ایران را در مقابل امارات و عربستان خصوصا در حوزه نظامی، تضعیف خواهد کرد. «انصارالله» تاکنون مانع ایفای نقشِ موثرترِ عربستان و امارات در قبالِ ایران شده است؛ نباید اشتباهِ «جبهه لبنان» _ درباره حزبالله_ را مجددا تکرار کرد! «حوثی»ها اگر کنترل جنوب غربِ یمن را از دست بدهند، «تنگه استراتژیک باب المندب» برای صادراتِ حداکثری نفت عربستان مهیاتر میشود و اهمیت استراتژیکِ «تنگه هرمز»، کاهش مییابد
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 102K followers, an engagement rate of 1.34%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 110K times each, and 1.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 107.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
- What is Ali Gholhaki's engagement rate on X?
- Ali Gholhaki (@aghplt) has an engagement rate of 1.34%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 102,064 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.34%, Ali Gholhaki sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @aghplt have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @aghplt post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.