Back to @againstgrmrs's profile

Gays Against Groomers engagement report

@againstgrmrs - 512K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.624%
of 512K followers
Per impression
8.77%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
7.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.206%
75 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 512K followers, an engagement rate of 0.624%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 8.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 27% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 4.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gays Against Groomers's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.624%, Gays Against Groomers sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 18, 20264.2x their median

    No one had a problem with drag queens… until they started after going after kids. No one had a problem with trans people… until they started going after kids. When will our “community” realize that people are not “anti-LGBTQ+,” but rather PRO-child protection? The radicals pushing this in our name are the ones doing damage to all of us, not those trying to safeguard children. #GaysAgainstGroomers

    11K1.9K22559112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20263.7x their median

    This is the most disturbing video you will see all day. Director of education for HiTops, an LGBTQ+ nonprofit focused on bringing queer theory and gender ideology into schools, says that the most critical time to get in the classroom are grades 5-8, to “catch kids when they’re starting puberty.” She goes onto say the the most rewarding experience for her was after going into an elementary school, 5 of students went to the principal’s office and “came out.” This is simply demonic. But they’re not coming for your kids, right? https://t.co/UdHToNkymp

    7.7K3.4K488353286K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20263.3x their median

    Ellen "Elliot" Page endorses the idea that "trans kids" need to be chemically castrated in order to be happy while looking more miserable than ever. Does this person look happy to you? https://t.co/2zLJ3s7Cwj

    8.0K9161.7K149236K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20263.2x their median

    No one had a problem with drag until they started involving children. https://t.co/HeGnXBtwWb

    8.7K1.3K1553163K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20262.2x their median

    Puberty is not something anyone consents to. Puberty is something that happens to you, naturally. Saying children can't consent to puberty is like saying they can't consent to getting a cavity or a scrapped knee. Children need to go through puberty naturally to develop into healthy adolescents and adults. “Blocking” it and trying to play God is child abuse. It harms children. The side effects are not reversible, as many claim. Leave the kids alone and let them grow. #GaysAgainstGroomers

    6.0K1.0K1232493K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20262.1x their median

    A civil war has broken out within our "community" – between sane gay people who want to live normal lives like everyone else, and the radical queers who hijacked decades of hard work and use “LGBTQIA+” as a shield to sexualize & indoctrinate kids. Burn this cult to the ground! https://t.co/y0NGYGXxVv

    5.4K9531744083K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.1x their median

    We went from telling kids to be cautious of strangers to telling them they should trust strangers and be cautious of their parents. It’s all upside down. The division being pushed between children and their families is only to make room for predators to take advantage of them. We will always stand with parents who know what’s best for their kids.

    5.4K1.1K461236K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.0x their median

    We are told over and over that drag is “family-friendly.” Please tell us, what is family-friendly about a man dancing in a dress, revealing his thong, in front of children?! https://t.co/R9quv1KJXx

    4.6K1.1K459142110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.0x their median

    Telling children their bodies are wrong, putting them on powerful drugs, and surgically altering healthy organs in the name of becoming their “true selves” is not compassion or affirming. It is abuse.

    5.3K829602347K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.8x their median

    Once you take "gender affirming" drugs and have "gender affirming" surgeries, there is no going back. It is PERMANENT. Could you imagine being stuck with a decision you made as a child for the rest of your life? What if that decision left you with missing body parts and sterilized? No child has the mental capacity to make these choices and any adult advocating for them to do so is a monster, point blank.

    4.5K1.0K752745K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 512K followers, an engagement rate of 0.624%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 8.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 27% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 4.2x its own typical post.

What is Gays Against Groomers's engagement rate on X?
Gays Against Groomers (@againstgrmrs) has an engagement rate of 0.624%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 512,414 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.624%, Gays Against Groomers sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @againstgrmrs have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @againstgrmrs post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going