Back to @adamuchigabriel's profile

Gabriel Adamuchi - kairogen.ai engagement report

@adamuchigabriel - 144K followers on X

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.035%
of 144K followers
Per impression
1.24%
4.1K views on a typical post
Reach
2.87%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
51
interactions (median)
Saved
0.582%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 51 interactions against 144K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 1.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 916 interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gabriel Adamuchi - kairogen.ai's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, Gabriel Adamuchi - kairogen.ai sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,515 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,033 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video93% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 218 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 202618x their median

    O ChatGPT agora pode montar sua árvore genealógica e encontrar parentes que você nem sabia que existiam. Ele pesquisa informações e cruza os dados para encontrar possíveis conexões na sua família. Comenta "FAMÍLIA" para receber os prompts. https://t.co/x1Hh6kB1LI

    37530507422K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20268.2x their median

    E ainda críticam a China... https://t.co/hmQu1DdkcB

    41035024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20266.1x their median

    Todo mundo postou demo do JEV. Quase ninguém explicou o que ele é. 👉🏻 Não escreve texto. Não escreve código. Alucinar é matematicamente impossível. ✅ Ele só decide, em tempo recorde: 0,1 segundo. https://t.co/W1aZvdmm3B

    295143012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.4x their median

    O ChatGPT agora pode procurar sites que estão vendendo seus dados pessoais e pedir a remoção. Com o GPT Work, ele abre o próprio navegador e executa as tarefas na sua frente. Funciona até no plano gratuito. 👉 Comenta "DADOS" para receber os prompts. https://t.co/shX3FTNrwz

    1412610608.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.1x their median

    4 comandos para transformar o ChatGPT no seu sistema de estudos. Organizar conteúdo, explicar assuntos, criar exercícios e acompanhar sua evolução. 👉 Comenta "GPT " para receber na DM. https://t.co/M3jnGMNTNZ

    144328228.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.7x their median

    Se você faz vibe coding, precisa conhecer esses 5 plugins. Eles podem melhorar bastante seus projetos no Claude Code ou Codex. O detalhe: todos são gratuitos. 👉Comenta "CÓDIGO" para receber os links. https://t.co/IdT7sefVCv

    168185028.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.5x their median

    O Claude ganhou uma skill que coloca 18 agentes para trabalhar no seu SEO ao mesmo tempo. A Claude SEO é gratuita e pode ser instalada com um único comando. Você escreve uma frase e os 18 agentes são disparados de uma vez no seu site. Link nos comentários 👇🏾 https://t.co/xodNHgDYfC

    128153807.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.5x their median

    Tem novidade no Codex hein... Bateu 100% do plano = Faz fallback pro GPT 5.6 Luna e dando um novo limite 👀 https://t.co/0yOh64MtBH

    1702709.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.9x their median

    90 dias de launch, 60 dias de escala, chegamos aos 100k MRR. Um lembrete pra você, perfeccionista que tá sempre adicionando feature e melhorando o produto, mas nunca lança: Faça seu launch, foque no marketing e vai melhorando o produto. O melhor feedback é sempre do usuário. https://t.co/I8e3QoquGd

    134410230K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.9x their median

    A Alibaba lançou a Z Image Turbo, uma IA de geração de imagens gratuita. Você instala uma vez e pode gerar quantas imagens quiser, e em apenas 3 segundos. Na KAIROGEN também existem planos com Z Image ilimitado. 👉 Comenta "TURBO" que te mando o link. https://t.co/DfOOJrPE5Q

    93124205.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 51 interactions against 144K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 1.24% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 916 interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is Gabriel Adamuchi - kairogen.ai's engagement rate on X?
Gabriel Adamuchi - kairogen.ai (@adamuchigabriel) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,642 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, Gabriel Adamuchi - kairogen.ai sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @adamuchigabriel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @adamuchigabriel post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going