Adam Rank engagement report
@adamrank - 493K followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 242 interactions against 493K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bears, #dabears, #beardown.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026. Recurring tags: #bears, #dabears, #beardown.
Compared with accounts its own size
Adam Rank's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.049%, Adam Rank sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 92 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 22, 201618x their median
Pat Tillman was the realest dude ever. I share some recollections of him here: https://t.co/qMi57DztpE https://t.co/O25RS3BYLU
- Sep 13, 202615x their median
Who was the guy who wrote that Caleb was one of the worst draft picks of the 2020s?
- Oct 16, 202614x their median
Never a doubt, Denver.
- Sep 13, 202614x their median
I want fantasy points for Colston Loveland's blocking.
- Sep 3, 20268.7x their median
I -- as an actual Angels fan -- welcome $20 beers and expensive seats if it means winning baseball.
- Oct 11, 20267.5x their median
I'm not mad. I'm just disappointed.
- Aug 23, 20266.9x their median
I sort of like that the Bears are underperformed here. Because Ben Johnson is not about to put up with that garbage.
- Aug 23, 20265.8x their median
Thank goodness Colston Loveland avoided injury on a blatant hip-drop on Saturday night. Looks like the officials are already in midseason form missing blatant roughing penalties against the Bears. Let’s go ahead and put the Bears offensive stars in bubble wrap and see you in September.
- Sep 13, 20265.5x their median
We love Kyle Monangai. Luther Burden III showing the no block, no rock mentality. https://t.co/KM2TCtrqmp
- Sep 13, 20265.2x their median
The Bears answer for what will be a turnover regression by their defense this season… Score a shitload of points every week. This is a good plan
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 242 interactions against 493K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bears, #dabears, #beardown.
- What is Adam Rank's engagement rate on X?
- Adam Rank (@adamrank) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 493,156 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.049%, Adam Rank sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @adamrank have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @adamrank post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.