Back to @adamrank's profile

Adam Rank engagement report

@adamrank - 493K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.011%
of 493K followers
Per impression
0.332%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
3.23%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
53
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 53 interactions against 493K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.332% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 81x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bears, #dabears, #beardown.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #bears, #dabears, #beardown.

Compared with accounts its own size

Adam Rank's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Adam Rank sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Apr 22, 201681x their median

    Pat Tillman was the realest dude ever. I share some recollections of him here: https://t.co/qMi57DztpE https://t.co/O25RS3BYLU

    3.6K42629735View on X
  • Aug 23, 202631x their median

    I sort of like that the Bears are underperformed here. Because Ben Johnson is not about to put up with that garbage.

    1.6K346315116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202626x their median

    Thank goodness Colston Loveland avoided injury on a blatant hip-drop on Saturday night. Looks like the officials are already in midseason form missing blatant roughing penalties against the Bears. Let’s go ahead and put the Bears offensive stars in bubble wrap and see you in September.

    1.3K41368127K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202617x their median

    We aren't talking enough about Colston Loveland. https://t.co/jzIu2kRhFo

    8102931636K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20266.9x their median

    I don't want to get ahead of myself and say I'm getting 2001 vibes about the Angels. But I really like the work that we've done since Perry was let go. We might be more like 2000 Angels, but I love the direction.

    340419120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.0x their median

    Still can't believe what the Browns are doing. https://t.co/OuadQbDVAk

    141128016K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.0x their median

    What a strike to Jahdae! https://t.co/eplY8fqQQ8

    15701016K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.7x their median

    Oh, I'm also all about Amon-Ra St. Brown, too. https://t.co/ixcudoc0sE

    13914029K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.5x their median

    New hat representing the legend @creamsleeve https://t.co/d37qrjNjpU

    11857316K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    Marvin Harrison Jr. is worth the risk. https://t.co/AvY35ERhJ0

    4506218K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bears#dabears#beardown#bengals#nfl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 53 interactions against 493K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.332% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.3K interactions, about 81x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bears, #dabears, #beardown.

What is Adam Rank's engagement rate on X?
Adam Rank (@adamrank) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 493,441 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Adam Rank sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @adamrank have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @adamrank post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going