Back to @adam3us's profile

Adam Back engagement report

@adam3us - 972K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.049%
of 972K followers
Per impression
1.08%
44K views on a typical post
Reach
4.56%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
481
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.33/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 481 interactions against 972K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 1.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 14% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 7.7x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.049%, Adam Back sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 136 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 8, 20267.7x their median

    BULL is challenging in court the EU's dangerous mass surveillance program for crypto users, DAC8. I cannot stand by and do nothing while faceless globalist bureaucrats put the security and privacy of millions of Europeans at risk. We will get DAC8 repealed. https://t.co/HO7xSsIbFw

    1.2K293723396K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20266.8x their median

    #bitcoin passes $63k 200wma https://t.co/Ac93xIjFFQ https://t.co/EyQwAi1JgH

    1.3K140498185K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.7x their median

    Live by the fork, die by the fork.

    1.1K761111872K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20244.3x their median

    Today we disclose Dark Skippy - a powerful new method for a malicious signing device to leak secret keys. With a modified signing function, a device can efficiently and covertly exfiltrate a master secret seed by embedding it within transaction signatures. https://t.co/dY543hChfM

    56018076106320K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20254.2x their median

    something for knots promoters to muse on: @lukedashjr being a 10th man, immune to peer pressure is a feature. BUT if you enable him, YOU will be peers he is immune to feedback from. and I believe it's a near CERTAINTY this will bite you all within a surprisingly short time-frame.

    6725214121109K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20261.8x their median

    malta🇲🇹 is nice at this time of year...

    7572194877K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.7x their median

    bitcoin-only hww, custody: complexity is the enemy of security. many alts don't have multisig or schnorr, one sizel lowest-common-denominator resulted in questionable custody architecture choices. bitcoin has cleanest architected, no alt marketing bullshit, hardcore security tech

    6796978761K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20261.7x their median

    vitalik.eth "public-key encryption cannot be done with hashes alone" 1976 Merkle paper disagrees https://t.co/H932LG4RDO involves an interactive proof of work like property, costs the attacker n times more. (not that asymmetric, but simple to understand first public key scheme).

    68857511279K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 2026

    @BlockstreamApp (formerly green wallet) has multisig 2fa feature. if you were using a HWW which turned out to have a hardware bug, using @blockstream wallet (and turn on 2fa eg google auth), you would have a last line of defense: the seed alone does not allow theft of funds.

    5434558974K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    Je suis devenu actionnaire de Capital B. Ceux qui me suivent savent que je m’intéresse au Bitcoin depuis des années, mais également aux différentes manières de s’y exposer. Capital B a fait un choix assez radical : lever des capitaux pour accumuler du Bitcoin et construire progressivement une réserve stratégique en BTC. La société cherche à utiliser les marchés de capitaux pour augmenter progressivement son exposition au Bitcoin et, si la stratégie fonctionne, créer davantage de valeur pour ses actionnaires que la simple détention de BTC. Autre point, le lancement du digital crédit a déjà été largement évoqué par Alexandre Laizet @AlexandreLaizet directeur général délégué de Capital B. C'est un information publique, et que Capital B ait la volonté de s’y lancer est un point d attraction majeur pour les investisseurs dont je fais partie. J’apprécie également le fait de retrouver autour du projet des acteurs reconnus de l’écosystème, notamment Adam Back @adam3us , figure historique de Bitcoin, ainsi que Yves Choueifaty président et fondateur de TOBAM, société de gestion présente depuis longtemps dans l’univers des actifs numériques. Évidemment, ce modèle ajoute aussi des risques : risque de marché, dilution lors des levées de capitaux, volatilité de l’action, valorisation parfois décorrélée de celle des bitcoins détenus… Capital B n’est pas du Bitcoin et acheter l’action n’équivaut pas à acheter directement du BTC. Cet investissement fait partie de ma poche crypto long terme, aux côtés d'une participation dans le média crypto de référence @TheBigWhale_  Ci-dessous le graphique mensuel de l'action, -90% post bear market, dont on ne sait pas s'il est terminé d'ailleurs. Second graphique, en journalier, une sorte de début de rounding bottom est possiblement en train de se former, d'où mon entrée récente (qui se fera en plusieurs fois dans les mois à venir).  ➡️ Cette publication n'est pas un conseil en investissement. ➡️ Investir comporte des risques, ne pas investir assure de perdre face à l'inflation.

    422429811190K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 481 interactions against 972K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 1.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 14% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 7.7x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Adam Back's engagement rate on X?
Adam Back (@adam3us) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 972,128 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.049%, Adam Back sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @adam3us have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @adam3us post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going