Back to @accnetwork's profile

ACC Network engagement report

@accnetwork - 151K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.211%
of 151K followers
Per impression
1.52%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
13.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
319
interactions (median)
Saved
0.052%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 319 interactions against 151K followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ACC Network's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.211%, ACC Network sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,555 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.671%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,555 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 115 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 20266.0x their median

    Darian Mensah has more TD passes than incompletions through the first 2 games of the season 🤯 šŸŽÆ 41/45 Comp/Att šŸŽÆ 653 Pass Yds šŸŽÆ 8 Pass TD šŸŽÆ 0 INT https://t.co/QheJm8cfXS

    1.6K233543576K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.8x their median

    Dabo Swinney gets the best of Bill Belichick šŸ”„ @ClemsonFB comes back from down double digits after a rain delay to beat UNC 😤 https://t.co/U2h3Ls3Eag

    1.1K82171134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.5x their median

    CARD NATION ... HERE WE COME ā€¼ļø ACC Huddle is headed to @WakeFB vs. @LouisvilleFB šŸæ https://t.co/FAUlSmvyXy

    94295472364K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.1x their median

    šŸ“ DEATH VALLEY ACC Huddle is headed to @UNCFootball vs. @ClemsonFB ā€¼ļø https://t.co/57A0aquzdF

    7526713055226K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.7x their median

    THE CARDS WIN A TOP-25 BATTLE OVER SMU! šŸ”„ @LouisvilleFB https://t.co/uy6JIRXv8M

    783855138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.6x their median

    Business is booming in Blacksburg šŸ“ˆ ā–Ŗļø 3-0 for the first time since 2017 ā–Ŗļø 152 PTS through first 3 games, most in program history @HokiesFB https://t.co/RaSPoge6C0

    763626788K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.4x their median

    From a touchdown to a fumble on the goal line 😳 After review, this play has been ruled a touchback for Louisville. https://t.co/RtCpazUANW

    69854151171K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.3x their median

    Hail to @Pitt_FB ā€¼ļø The Panthers are 3-0 for the third time in 12 seasons under head coach Pat Narduzzi šŸ‘ https://t.co/ruZYOTj4o5

    683457322K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.1x their median

    Darian Mensah šŸ¹ @CanesFootball https://t.co/02uYR3lKza

    605724217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.0x their median

    Another week, another Heisman pose for Malachi Toney šŸ˜®ā€šŸ’Ø This Mensah X Toney duo is ELITE. @CanesFootball https://t.co/Pd5u1wfBb4

    539682613187K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 319 interactions against 151K followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post.

What is ACC Network's engagement rate on X?
ACC Network (@accnetwork) has an engagement rate of 0.211%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 151,301 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.211%, ACC Network sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,555 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @accnetwork have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @accnetwork post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going