Abhishek Raja "Ram" | Revolutionary Raja Ram engagement report
@abhishekrajaram - 102K followers on X
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 102K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.0K times each, and 0.301% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 25% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 89 interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Abhishek Raja "Ram" | Revolutionary Raja Ram's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.006%, Abhishek Raja "Ram" | Revolutionary Raja Ram sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 53% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 53% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 949 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 13, 202615x their median
An auditor blamed his junior staff before the ICAI Disciplinary Committee. The Committee rejected it. The result: reprimand, ₹1 lakh fine and 3 months’ removal from the register. (Order, Feb 2026) What went wrong, and what every partner should take from it 🧵👇
- Oct 14, 202615x their median
Notice should be served physically once the GST Registration is canceled. The Taxpayer is under no obligation to check the portal. They might be unaware of any proceeding, in case, notice is served through the portal only. In such a case, the service is not under section 169. Manoj Kumar Yadav vs State of Uttar Pradesh - Allahabad High Court WRIT TAX No. - 4061 of 2026 | 2026:AHC: 08686-DB | 06-Oct-2026
- Oct 15, 202610x their median
No more "Unknown Number" calls in India 🇮🇳 Indian Government Mandates Caller Names on 4G Calls from November 2026 From Nov 1, 2026, Airtel, Vi, Jio, and BSNL must show KYC-based caller names for unsaved domestic numbers on 4G+ networks. Saved contacts display normally; international calls show “International Call.” The move targets spam without third-party apps, with operator grievance channels and privacy safeguards.
- Oct 14, 20266.3x their median
Powerful Judgment from GSTAT Kolkata Incorrect GST Return Details Alone Can’t Prove Wilful Misstatement. Santosh Jaiswal vs Anand Surana APL/1//KLK/2026 | 13-Oct-2026
- Oct 13, 20265.8x their median
Notice पुराने auditor की email पर चला गया। Taxpayer को पता नहीं। Order ex parte। AT Creations। Proprietor Saleem Fathima Asma Jan। Hearing और Notice उस email पर गए, जो पुराने auditor के पास थी। Contact टूट चुका था। लगभग एक साल तक कोई effective proceeding नहीं। 29 September 2025 को DRC-01। 31 December 2025 को Section 73 का Order। Karnataka High Court ने reason को bona fide माना। Order और summary रद्द। 10% deposit। Fresh reply। Auditor बदल गया। Email नहीं बदली। इतनी सी बात। High Court। Case: M/s AT Creations vs. Commercial Tax authorities Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: Justice B. M. Shyam Prasad Proprietor: Saleem Fathima Asma Jan Citation: Writ Petition No. 25781 of 2026 (T - RES) Dated: 19-Aug-2026 SCN: Form GST DRC-01 dated 29-09-2025 Order set aside: adjudication and summary dated 31-12-2025, under Section 73, KGST Act Held: notices went to the former auditor’s email; explanation plausible and bona fide; proceedings restored subject to 10% of disputed tax and reply with documents by 05-10-2026
- Oct 8, 20265.3x their median
Analysis of the 57th GST Council Meeting https://t.co/YphbfheGO7
- Oct 13, 20263.7x their median
Registration cancel हो चुका था। Business बंद था। SCN सिर्फ़ portal पर डाल दिया। A.K. Traders। GSTIN 2 January 2025 को cancel। उसके बाद कोई business नहीं। Department ने SCN उसी portal पर upload कर दिया। 20 December 2025 को Section 73 का Order। Allahabad High Court ने कहा: cancel होने के बाद taxpayer portal check करने को bound नहीं है। Service दूसरे mode से होनी थी। Order रद्द। Department को proper Notice देने की liberty। बंद पड़ा Registration। एक upload। एक Order। High Court। Case: A.K. Traders vs. State of U.P. Court: Allahabad High Court Citation: Writ Tax No. 1013 of 2026 Dated: 28-Jul-2026 Registration cancelled: 02-01-2025 Order set aside: dated 20-12-2025, under Section 73 Held: after cancellation, portal upload alone is not valid service; natural justice violated; Department may issue a proper Notice and proceed as per law Relied on: M/s Katyal Industries vs. State of U.P., 2024:AHC:23697-DB
- Oct 13, 20263.2x their median
Address mismatch मिला। Department ने ₹1.07 लाख penalty लगा दी। A H Traders। Abdul Hai। Arecanuts। 3,990 kg। Invoice Baba Mahakal Enterprises, West Bengal का। E-way bill था। Invoice था। Interception पर officer को address का फर्क दिखा। Invoice का address और GST registration का principal place of business match नहीं कर रहा था। Diversion नहीं। Fake movement नहीं। Intent to evade का कोई evidence नहीं। फिर भी Section 129। Penalty ₹1,07,730। GSTAT Lucknow ने कहा: address mismatch alone, evasion नहीं बनता। Order रद्द। एक address का फर्क। एक लाख रुपये। Tribunal तक का चक्कर। Case: A H Traders through Abdul Hai Forum: GSTAT, Lucknow Bench Citation: APL/117/(LCK)/2026 Dated: 29-Sep-2026 Goods: arecanuts, 3,990 kg Supplier: Baba Mahakal Enterprises, West Bengal Penalty set aside: ₹1,07,730 under Section 129 Held: difference between invoice address and registered principal place of business, without evidence of tax evasion, cannot sustain the penalty
- Oct 14, 20262.8x their median
Owner documents ले आया। E-way bill। E-invoice। Bilty। Department ने देखा नहीं। Penalty ₹18.15 लाख। Rambabu and Another। Old battery scrap। 14,130 kg। Vehicle No. UP53DT1358। Tax invoice 11 August 2026। E-way bill साथ में। Detention 14 August 2026। MOV-06। MOV-07 cum DRC-01। Owner हाज़िर हुआ। Documents दिए। Officers ने consider नहीं किया। Section 129(3)। Penalty ₹18,15,902। Allahabad High Court ने Order रद्द कर दिया। Documents देखो। Circular No. 76/50/2018-GST follow करो। आदमी कागज़ लेकर खड़ा था। Department ने कागज़ नहीं खोले। High Court। Case: Rambabu and Another vs. State of U.P. Court: Allahabad High Court Citation: Writ Tax No. - 1114 of 2026 Dated: 03-Sep-2026 Bench: Justice Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary and Justice Shekhar B. Saraf Detention: 14-08-2026; vehicle UP53DT1358; 14,130 kg old battery scrap; invoice dated 11-08-2026 Penalty set aside: ₹18,15,902 under Section 129(3) Held: e-way bill, e-tax invoice and bilty produced by the owner ought to have been examined; authority to reconsider as per Circular No. 76/50/2018-GST dated 31-12-2018
- Oct 14, 20262.7x their median
PIN code गलत टाइप हो गया। System ने distance आधा कर दिया। E-way bill expire। Penalty ₹9.40 लाख। T. Stanes and Company Limited। Actual distance 215 km। Wrong PIN code। System ने 100 km मान लिया। Validity कम हो गई। Bill रास्ते में expire। Clerical mistake। Mens rea नहीं। Intent to evade का allegation नहीं। फिर भी Section 129। Penalty ₹9,40,880। GSTAT Bengaluru ने कहा: procedural lapse, evasion नहीं। Penalty रद्द। एक digit की गलती। नौ लाख रुपये। GSTAT। Case: T. Stanes and Company Limited vs Sulakshana SN, JCCT (Appeals) Mangaluru Forum: GSTAT, Bengaluru Bench Citation: APL/12/BUR/2026 Dated: 29-Sep-2026 Bench: Sudha Koka (Technical) and Srikanth Venkatraman (Judicial) Error: wrong PIN code; system distance 100 km instead of actual 215 km; e-way bill expired earlier Penalty set aside: ₹9,40,880 under Section 129 Held: clerical mistake; no intention to evade tax; Section 129 not justified
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 102K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.0K times each, and 0.301% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 25% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 89 interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
- What is Abhishek Raja "Ram" | Revolutionary Raja Ram's engagement rate on X?
- Abhishek Raja "Ram" | Revolutionary Raja Ram (@abhishekrajaram) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 102,455 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.006%, Abhishek Raja "Ram" | Revolutionary Raja Ram sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @abhishekrajaram have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @abhishekrajaram post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.