Back to @aapp_burma's profile

AAPP (Burma) engagement report

@aapp_burma - 156K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.046%
of 156K followers
Per impression
4.38%
1.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
71
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 156K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 4.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87 interactions.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

AAPP (Burma)'s engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.046%, AAPP (Burma) sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 300 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 2026

    DAILY UPDATE 8/9/26 DAY 2046 8,344 killed (+9) 31,894 total arrested (+7) 14,797 still detained (verified) (+5) 7,873 still detained (unverified) Brief: https://t.co/V0tZiQmh1Y Find data: https://t.co/xg0cxJXcPU https://t.co/r80XVQRR3J

    4237172.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    DAILY UPDATE 21/9/26 DAY 2059 8,414 killed (+15) 31,954 total arrested (+6) 14,839 still detained (verified) (+10) 7,870 still detained (unverified) Brief: https://t.co/LHknZKYiFK Find data: https://t.co/xg0cxJXcPU https://t.co/RokMsKalLC

    4039141.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    DAILY UPDATE 31/8/26 DAY 2038 8,332 killed (+2) 31,852 total arrested (+9) 14,765 still detained (verified) (+9) 7,871 still detained (unverified) Brief: https://t.co/mzxt2zU8jM Find data: https://t.co/xg0cxJXcPU https://t.co/e2NZWeKUCH

    4434152.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    DAILY UPDATE 24/8/26 DAY 2031 8,302 killed (+2) 31,815 total arrested (+8) 14,738 still detained (verified) (+3) 7,867 still detained (unverified) Brief: https://t.co/MJMqMm2I8J Find data: https://t.co/xg0cxJXcPU https://t.co/jM1Sv5JHvI

    4432262.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 2026

    DAILY UPDATE 7/8/26 DAY 2014 8,239 killed (+2) 31,686 total arrested (+17) 14,647 still detained (verified) (+3) 7,863 still detained (unverified) Brief: https://t.co/Sr2X36vOWZ Find data: https://t.co/xg0cxJXcPU https://t.co/yVrywOlpMI

    4036232.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    DAILY UPDATE 18/8/26 DAY 2025 8,289 killed (+7) 31,792 total arrested (+16) 14,725 still detained (verified) (+14) 7,865 still detained (unverified) Brief: https://t.co/aUQ5GfizWA Find data: https://t.co/xg0cxJXcPU https://t.co/uJalO7hFPc

    3835252.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    DAILY UPDATE 10/9/26 DAY 2048 8,367 killed (+22) 31,907 total arrested (+8) 14,806 still detained (verified) (+6) 7,873 still detained (unverified) Brief: https://t.co/Wo0F2tPEHa Find data: https://t.co/xg0cxJXcPU https://t.co/GhViKgkqud

    2843151.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    DAILY UPDATE 10/8/26 DAY 2017 8,239 killed (+0) 31,700 total arrested (+14) 14,645 still detained (verified) (-2) 7,863 still detained (unverified) Brief: https://t.co/E06IcCfKaG Find data: https://t.co/xg0cxJXcPU https://t.co/GHSA28gHnP

    3933231.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    DAILY UPDATE 15/9/26 DAY 2053 8,384 killed (+13) 31,926 total arrested (+6) 14,817 still detained (verified) (+6) 7,874 still detained (unverified) Brief: https://t.co/P6KkGIiM0g Find data: https://t.co/xg0cxJXcPU https://t.co/4ya920HTAp

    3635132.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    DAILY UPDATE 14/9/26 DAY 2052 8,371 killed (+2) 31,920 total arrested (+7) 14,811 still detained (verified) (+5) 7,874 still detained (unverified) Brief: https://t.co/EZP8YIUxk6 Find data: https://t.co/xg0cxJXcPU https://t.co/HPhEhjQla2

    3535131.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 156K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 4.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87 interactions.

What is AAPP (Burma)'s engagement rate on X?
AAPP (Burma) (@aapp_burma) has an engagement rate of 0.046%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 155,974 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.046%, AAPP (Burma) sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @aapp_burma have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @aapp_burma post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going