Back to @aa9skillz's profile

aa9skillz engagement report

@aa9skillz - 636K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.246%
of 636K followers
Per impression
1.62%
97K views on a typical post
Reach
15.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 636K followers, an engagement rate of 0.246%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 97K times each, and 1.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 286K interactions, about 183x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fc27, #eafc.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #fc27, #eafc.

Compared with accounts its own size

aa9skillz's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.246%, aa9skillz sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 6, 2026183x their median

    🚨🔵🔴 Rodri has spoken to Deco and Hansi Flick and gave his green light to Barcelona in order to proceed in talks. Official contract proposal already in Rodri’s agent hands and Barça also made contact with Manchester City. Operation Rodri: full speed for FCB. 💥 https://t.co/IIQcrpQakG

    253K20K6.2K7.3K17M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202646x their median

    You can hate Argentina all you want… You will never see another nation fight harder for their shirt than these players unbelievable

    67K5.3K24565686K viewsView on X
  • Nov 15, 202415x their median

    Project Cristiano Ronaldo or alexia putellas in the works!!!! Can’t wait for our little baby!!!! ❤️ @LotsOfBunnies https://t.co/BnSboXfVMh

    22K734600821.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20269.0x their median

    🚨 Official Ballon d'Or account statement: "Yes, winning the World Cup helps, but it does not guarantee a Ballon d'Or. To win it, you need to have been the best player of the season, not only of the World Cup." https://t.co/nVtv58YNeg

    12K6757139063.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20265.8x their median

    Argentina’s most deadly attack tonight… https://t.co/iLdwpCZCYy

    8.5K4977347240K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20265.4x their median

    Benfica are winning 7-0 and I don’t know how to feel… we was so bad under Mourinho I think I’m confused they’re playing good football 😂😂

    8.1K2068013312K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20263.7x their median

    This edit 🥶 https://t.co/64Dv6ecGZj

    5.5K2873610243K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20263.1x their median

    Can someone explain why Fabrizio Romano is beefing with another journalist 😭

    4.7K41781345K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20263.1x their median

    How it started How its going https://t.co/cDkm9QJrO4

    4.6K15340680K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 20263.0x their median

    “ he doesn’t deserve to start “ “ he shouldn’t get called up “ https://t.co/AzDFCS2i4r

    4.4K13251877K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fc27#eafc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 636K followers, an engagement rate of 0.246%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 97K times each, and 1.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 15.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 29% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 286K interactions, about 183x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fc27, #eafc.

What is aa9skillz's engagement rate on X?
aa9skillz (@aa9skillz) has an engagement rate of 0.246%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 636,456 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.246%, aa9skillz sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @aa9skillz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @aa9skillz post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going